Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon Xpress 1200 Series Radeon X1200 128mb
Red Dead Redemption 2 35567% 29622%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35567% 29622%
Cyberpunk 2077 48900% 40733%
Fortnite: Chapter 2 16233% 13511%
FIFA 20 18900% 15733%
The Outer Worlds 29567% 24622%
Borderlands 3 37567% 31289%
Need For Speed Heat 35567% 29622%
Star Wars: Jedi - Fallen Order 48900% 40733%
Zombieland: Double Tap - Road Trip 33233% 27678%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon X1200 128mb are noticeably better than the AMD Radeon Xpress 1200 Series.

Both the Radeon Xpress 1200 Series and the Radeon X1200 128mb were released at the same time, so are likely to be quite similar.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The Radeon X1200 128mb has 128 MB video memory, but the Xpress 1200 does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

Both the Radeon Xpress 1200 Series and the Radeon X1200 128mb have 4 Shader Processing Units. Having the same number of SPUs and using the same architecture means that the performance they offer can be compared by looking at the memory bandwidth, Texture and Pixel Rates. In this case, we sadly do not have enough data in this area to complete the comparison.

GPU Architecture

Core Speed350 MHzvs350 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureRS690CRS690C
OC Potential Poor vs -
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date28 Feb 2007vs28 Feb 2007
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

Memory-vsN/A
Memory Speed-vs-
Memory Bus128 Bitvs64 Bit
Memory TypeDDR2vsDDR2
Memory Bandwidth-vs-
L2 Cache - vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units4vs4
Actual Shader Performance0%vs0%
Technology-vs-
Texture Mapping Units-vs-
Texture Rate-vs-
Render Output Units-vs-
Pixel Rate-vs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)2048x1536vs2048x1536
VGA Connections-vs-
DVI Connections-vs-
HDMI Connections-vs-
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power--
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX9.0bvs9.0b
Shader Model3.0vs2.0
Open GL2.0vs2.0
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatedyesvsno
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewATI's 'R520' core (codenamed Fudo) is the foundation for a line of DirectX 9.0c and OpenGL 2.0 3D accelerator X1000 video cards. It is ATI's first major architectural overhaul since the 'R300' core and is highly optimized for Shader Model 3.0. The Radeon X1000 series using the core was introduced on October 5, 2005, and competed primarily against nVidia's GeForce 7000 series. ATI released the successor to the R500 series with the R600 series on May 14, 2007. ATI does not provide official support for any X1000 series cards for Windows 7Radeon X1200 is known as Radeon Xpress 1200. Check its page to know more about it.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
-
GPU Variants
-
-

Title

Body