Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon Xpress 1200 Series GeForce 4 MX 440
Cyberpunk 2077 37567% 9726%
Hitman 3 48900% 12683%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 34350% 8887%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 33233% 8596%
FIFA 21 18900% 4857%
Grand Theft Auto VI 52900% 13726%
Far Cry 6 54400% 14117%
Genshin Impact 37567% 9726%
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands 53900% 13987%
Battlefield 6 48900% 12683%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce 4 MX 440 are massively better than the AMD Radeon Xpress 1200 Series.

The Xpress 1200 was released over three years more recently than the 4 MX, and so the Xpress 1200 is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the 4 MX when running the latest games.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The 4 MX has 128 MB video memory, but the Xpress 1200 does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The Radeon Xpress 1200 Series has 4 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce 4 MX 440 has 2. The two GPUs are based on different architectures, but deliver an equivalent shader performance. To compare, we must continue to look at the memory bandwidth, Texture and Pixel Rates. In this case, we sadly do not have enough data in this area to complete the comparison.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed350 MHzvs275 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureRS690CNV17
OC Potential Poor vs -
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date28 Feb 2007vs06 Feb 2002
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

Memory-vs128 MB
Memory Speed-vs200 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeDDR2vsDDR
Memory Bandwidth-vs3.2GB/sec
L2 Cache - vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units4vs2
Actual Shader Performance0%vs0%
Technology-vs-
Texture Mapping Units-vs-
Texture Rate-vs-
Render Output Units-vs-
Pixel Rate-vs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)2048x1536vs1600x1200
VGA Connections-vs1
DVI Connections-vs1
HDMI Connections-vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power--
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX9.0bvs7.0
Shader Model3.0vs-
Open GL2.0vs1.2
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewATI's 'R520' core (codenamed Fudo) is the foundation for a line of DirectX 9.0c and OpenGL 2.0 3D accelerator X1000 video cards. It is ATI's first major architectural overhaul since the 'R300' core and is highly optimized for Shader Model 3.0. The Radeon X1000 series using the core was introduced on October 5, 2005, and competed primarily against nVidia's GeForce 7000 series. ATI released the successor to the R500 series with the R600 series on May 14, 2007. ATI does not provide official support for any X1000 series cards for Windows 7GeForce4 MX 440 is part of the GeForce4 GPUS released by NVIDIA in 2002. Only compatible with DirectX 7 or less and with a max memory of 128 MB, it can't play today's games. Still, games before 2003 should be fully playable at max settings....
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
-
GPU Variants
-
-