Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game GeForce 2 MX 100/200 32MB Radeon Xpress 1200 Series
Red Dead Redemption 2 29622% 35567%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 29622% 35567%
Zombieland: Double Tap - Road Trip 27678% 33233%
Cyberpunk 2077 40733% 48900%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 40733% 48900%
Borderlands 3 31289% 37567%
The Outer Worlds 27122% 32567%
FIFA 20 15733% 18900%
Fortnite: Chapter 2 13511% 16233%
eFootball PES 2020 20178% 24233%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce 2 MX 100/200 32MB are noticeably better than the AMD Radeon Xpress 1200 Series.

The Xpress 1200 was released over three years more recently than the 2 MX, and so the Xpress 1200 is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the 2 MX when running the latest games.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The 2 MX has 32 MB video memory, but the Xpress 1200 does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The GeForce 2 MX 100/200 32MB has 2 Shader Processing Units and the Radeon Xpress 1200 Series has 4. However, the actual shader performance of the 2 MX is 0 and the actual shader performance of the Xpress 1200 is 1. The Xpress 1200 having 1 better shader performance is not particularly notable, as altogether the 2 MX performs better when taking into account other relevant data.

GPU Architecture

Core Speed175 MHzvs350 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureNV11RS690C
OC Potential - vs Poor
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date03 Mar 2001vs28 Feb 2007
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

Memory32 MBvs-
Memory Speed166 MHzvs-
Memory Bus64 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeDDRvsDDR2
Memory Bandwidth1.3GB/secvs-
L2 Cache - vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units2vs4
Actual Shader Performance-vs0%
Technology-vs-
Texture Mapping Units-vs-
Texture Rate-vs-
Render Output Units-vs-
Pixel Rate-vs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)1600x1200vs2048x1536
VGA Connections1vs-
DVI Connections-vs-
HDMI Connections0vs-
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power--
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX7vs9.0b
Shader Model-vs3.0
Open GL1.2vs2.0
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewGeForce2 MX 100/200 32MB is part of the GeForce2 Series released by NVIDIA in 2000/2001. With very few dedicated memory and only DirectX 7.0 (and less) support, even games from 2002 will require reduced settings. Therefore, it can't play today's current games.ATI's 'R520' core (codenamed Fudo) is the foundation for a line of DirectX 9.0c and OpenGL 2.0 3D accelerator X1000 video cards. It is ATI's first major architectural overhaul since the 'R300' core and is highly optimized for Shader Model 3.0. The Radeon X1000 series using the core was introduced on October 5, 2005, and competed primarily against nVidia's GeForce 7000 series. ATI released the successor to the R500 series with the R600 series on May 14, 2007. ATI does not provide official support for any X1000 series cards for Windows 7
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
-
GPU Variants
-
-

Title

Body

Ads

or, become Premium, be ad free + get access to all GD’s extra features

Here’s one for everyone. We remove ads for 24hrs if you visit the link below. You don’t need to buy anything there, just follow the link and be ad free.