Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game GeForce 2 MX 100/200 32MB GeForce 4 MX 440
Cyberpunk 2077 31289% 9726%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 28608% 8887%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 27678% 8596%
Hitman 3 40733% 12683%
Grand Theft Auto VI 44067% 13726%
FIFA 21 15733% 4857%
Far Cry 6 45317% 14117%
Genshin Impact 31289% 9726%
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands 44900% 13987%
Watch Dogs Legion 30178% 9378%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce 4 MX 440 are massively better than the Nvidia GeForce 2 MX 100/200 32MB.

The 4 MX was released less than a year after the 2 MX, and so they are likely to have similar driver support for optimizing performance when running the latest games.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The 4 MX has 96 MB more video memory than the 2 MX, so is likely to be slightly better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the 4 MX also has superior memory performance overall.

The 4 MX has 1.9 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the 2 MX, which means that the memory performance of the 4 MX is marginally better than the 2 MX.

Both the GeForce 2 MX 100/200 32MB and the GeForce 4 MX 440 have 2 Shader Processing Units. While the two GPUs have the same number of SPUs, the actual performance delivered by the 4 MX is 1 and by the 2 MX is 1. Knowing that the shader performance of the 4 MX is superior, it is not necessary to examine the GPUs' respective Texture and Pixel Fill Rates.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed175 MHzvs275 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureNV11NV17
OC Potential - vs -
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date03 Mar 2001vs06 Feb 2002
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

Memory32 MBvs128 MB
Memory Speed166 MHzvs200 MHz
Memory Bus64 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeDDRvsDDR
Memory Bandwidth1.3GB/secvs3.2GB/sec
L2 Cache - vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units2vs2
Actual Shader Performance-vs0%
Technology-vs-
Texture Mapping Units-vs-
Texture Rate-vs-
Render Output Units-vs-
Pixel Rate-vs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)1600x1200vs1600x1200
VGA Connections1vs1
DVI Connections-vs1
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power--
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX7vs7.0
Shader Model-vs-
Open GL1.2vs1.2
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewGeForce2 MX 100/200 32MB is part of the GeForce2 Series released by NVIDIA in 2000/2001. With very few dedicated memory and only DirectX 7.0 (and less) support, even games from 2002 will require reduced settings. Therefore, it can't play today's current games.GeForce4 MX 440 is part of the GeForce4 GPUS released by NVIDIA in 2002. Only compatible with DirectX 7 or less and with a max memory of 128 MB, it can't play today's games. Still, games before 2003 should be fully playable at max settings....
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
-
GPU Variants
-
-