Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon HD 8350 (OEM) Intel HD Graphics 3000 Desktop
Cyberpunk 2077 2913% 2725%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 2656% 2484%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 2567% 2400%
FIFA 21 1420% 1325%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2567% 2400%
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands 4220% 3950%
Watch Dogs Legion 2807% 2625%
Horizon: Zero Dawn 2753% 2575%
Grand Theft Auto VI 4140% 3875%
Genshin Impact 2913% 2725%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Intel HD Graphics 3000 Desktop are very slightly better than the AMD Radeon HD 8350 (OEM).

The Graphics 3000 has a 200 MHz higher core clock speed than the HD 8350, but the HD 8350 has 6 more Texture Mapping Units than the Graphics 3000. As a result, the HD 8350 exhibits a 3.5 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the Graphics 3000. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The Graphics 3000 has a 200 MHz higher core clock speed than the HD 8350, but the HD 8350 has 2 more Render Output Units than the Graphics 3000. As a result, the HD 8350 exhibits a 0.9 GPixel/s better Pixel Fill Rate than the Graphics 3000. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The HD 8350 was released over a year more recently than the Graphics 3000, and so the HD 8350 is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the Graphics 3000.

The HD 8350 has 512 MB video memory, but the Graphics 3000 does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The Radeon HD 8350 (OEM) has 80 Shader Processing Units and the HD Graphics 3000 Desktop has 12. However, the actual shader performance of the HD 8350 is 26 and the actual shader performance of the Graphics 3000 is 65. The Graphics 3000 having 39 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the Graphics 3000 delivers a marginally smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the HD 8350.

The Graphics 3000 transistor size technology is 8 nm (nanometers) smaller than the HD 8350. This means that the Graphics 3000 is expected to run very slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the HD 8350. While they exhibit similar graphical performance, the Graphics 3000 should consume less power than the HD 8350.

The Radeon HD 8350 (OEM) requires 25 Watts to run and the HD Graphics 3000 Desktop requires 95 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 250 Watts for the HD 8350 and a PSU with at least 300 Watts for the Graphics 3000. The Graphics 3000 requires 70 Watts more than the HD 8350 to run. The difference is significant enough that the Graphics 3000 may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the HD 8350.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed650 MHzvs850 MHz
Boost Clock-vs1350 MHz
ArchitectureTerascale Cedar PROSandy Bridge GT2
OC Potential Fair vs None
Driver Support Poor vs Poor
Release Date08 Jan 2013vs01 Feb 2011
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768 - vs green tick
3.7
1600x900
2.1
vs green tick
2.4
1920x1080
1.5
vs green tick
1.6
2560x1440
1.1
vs green tick
1.2
3840x2160 - green tick vs green tick -

GPU Memory

Memory512 MBvsN/A
Memory Speed800 MHzvs667 MHz
Memory Bus64 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3vsDDR3
Memory Bandwidth12.8GB/secvs21.3GB/sec
L2 Cache 128 KB vs green tick 1024 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units80vs12
Actual Shader Performance1%vs3%
Technology40nmvs32nm
Texture Mapping Units8vs2
Texture Rate5.2 GTexel/svs1.7 GTexel/s
Render Output Units4vs2
Pixel Rate2.6 GPixel/svs1.7 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)2560x1600vs2560x1600
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections1vs0
HDMI Connections1vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power25 Wattsvs95 Watts
Recommended PSU250 Watts & 17 Ampsvs300 Watts & 22 Amps

GPU Features

DirectX11.0vs10.1
Shader Model5.0vs4.1
Open GL4.3vs3.1
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatedyesvsno
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Celeron G1610 2.6GHz-
Recommended RAM2 GBvs4 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1024x768vs1024x768

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
Radeon HD 8350 (OEM) is an OEM Only, entry-level Graphics Card based on the first revision of the Terascale Architecture.

Architecture
Terascale was AMD's first Unified Shader Architecture. In addition to being manufactured with a 40nm Technology, against the 55nm of previous Graphics Cards, it supports DirectX 10 and the Shaders now called Shader Processing Units have been redesigned and do all the Graphical work of Pixel and Vertex Shaders.

GPU
It equips a GPU codenamed Cedar PRO which has 1 Compute Units activated and thus offers 80 Shader Processing Units, 8 TMUs and 4 ROPs. The Central Unit Operates at 650MHz.

Memory
The GPU accesses a 512MB frame buffer of GDDR3, through a 64-bit memory interface. The memory clock operates at 800MHz. The size of the frame buffer is adequate.

Features
DirectX 11.0 Support (11.0 Hardware Default) and support for Crossfire, Eyefinity, Stream Acceleration, PowerPlay and other technologies.

Cooling Solution
The Cooling Solution consists of a Single-Fan.

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 18W, it requires at least a 250W PSU and it relies entirely on the PCI Slot for power, meaning no extra connectors are required.

Performance
Radeon HD 8350 (OEM) is a Direct Rebrand of Radeon HD 6350 and performs exactly like it.
Gaming benchmarks indicate its performance is extremely limited and even the older GeForce GT 220 is still faster.

System Suggestions
We recommend a modest processor (Intel Celeron) and 2GB of RAM for a system with Radeon HD 8350 (OEM).
Overview
Intel HD Graphics 3000 Desktop are Integrated Graphics in some of Intel's Desktop Sandy Bridge Processors.

Architecture
The Sandy Bridge GT2 Core includes support for DirectX 10.1 and OpenGL 3.1. Additionally, it also offers better Video Encoding and Decoding Performance, when compared to its Predecessor.

GPU
It equips a GPU Codenamed GT2 which offers 12 Shader Processing Units, 2 TMUs and 2 ROPs. The Central Unit Initially Runs at 850MHz and goes up to 1350MHz, in Turbo Mode.

Memory
The GPU Shares the System's RAM which varies from System to System. Typically, the GPU reserves 1.7GB. Depending on whether or not the system's RAM is Dual-Channeled, it can access either a 64-bit or 128-bit memory interface. The operating memory clock also depends on which speed the System's RAM is running and is limited by the highest operating speed that the Processor supports. In this case, it is 667MHz.
It is then obvious the Memory Bandwidth depends on a lot of factors and thus this Graphics Card performance may vary heavily from system to system.

Performance
The Most Powerful Variant Offers Performance similar to a dedicated GeForce GT 610.
Select the Specific Version you have of this Graphics Card According to your Processor for a more Accurate Rank and experience using our tools.

System Suggestions
We recommend 4GB of RAM for a system with Intel HD Graphics 3000 Desktop.
Recommended CPU
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
GPU Variants
-