Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon HD 7750 Crossfire GeForce GTX 465
Cyberpunk 2077 183% 265%
Hitman 3 268% 374%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 158% 233%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 150% 223%
FIFA 21 43% 84%
Grand Theft Auto VI 298% 413%
Far Cry 6 309% 427%
Genshin Impact 183% 265%
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands 305% 423%
Battlefield 6 268% 374%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon HD 7750 Crossfire are noticeably better than the Nvidia GeForce GTX 465.

The HD 7750 has a 193 MHz higher core clock speed and 20 more Texture Mapping Units than the GeForce GTX 465. This results in the HD 7750 providing 24.5 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The HD 7750 has a 193 MHz higher core clock speed than the GeForce GTX 465 and the same number of Render Output Units. This results in the HD 7750 providing 6.2 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The HD 7750 was released over a year more recently than the GeForce GTX 465, and so the HD 7750 is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the GeForce GTX 465.

The HD 7750 has 1024 MB more video memory than the GeForce GTX 465, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the HD 7750 also has superior memory performance overall.

The HD 7750 has 41.3 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GeForce GTX 465, which means that the memory performance of the HD 7750 is noticeably better than the GeForce GTX 465.

The Radeon HD 7750 Crossfire has 1024 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GTX 465 has 352. However, the actual shader performance of the HD 7750 is 696 and the actual shader performance of the GeForce GTX 465 is 427. The HD 7750 having 269 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the HD 7750 delivers a significantly smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the GeForce GTX 465.

The HD 7750 transistor size technology is 12 nm (nanometers) smaller than the GeForce GTX 465. This means that the HD 7750 is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the GeForce GTX 465.

The Radeon HD 7750 Crossfire requires 110 Watts to run and the GeForce GTX 465 requires 200 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 500 Watts for the HD 7750 and a PSU with at least 550 Watts for the GeForce GTX 465. The GeForce GTX 465 requires 90 Watts more than the HD 7750 to run. The difference is significant enough that the GeForce GTX 465 may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the HD 7750.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed800 MHzvs607 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 Cape Verde PRO (x2)Fermi GF100-030-A3
OC Potential Good vs Fair
Driver Support Good vs Poor
Release Date01 Feb 2012vs01 May 2010
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768 - vs green tick
9.4
1600x900 - vs green tick
7.2
1920x1080
6.3
green tick vs
5.5
2560x1440 - vs green tick
3.6
3840x2160 - green tick vs green tick -

GPU Memory

Memory2048 MBvs1024 MB
Memory Speed1125 MHzvs802 MHz
Memory Bus256 Bitvs256 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth144GB/secvs102.7GB/sec
L2 Cache 1024 KB green tick vs 512 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units1024vs352
Actual Shader Performance33%vs21%
Technology28nmvs40nm
Texture Mapping Units64vs44
Texture Rate51.2 GTexel/svs26.7 GTexel/s
Render Output Units32vs32
Pixel Rate25.6 GPixel/svs19.4 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)4096x2160vs2560x1600
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections0vs2
HDMI Connections0vs1
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power110 Wattsvs200 Watts
Recommended PSU500 Watts & 42 Ampsvs550 Watts & 30 Amps

GPU Features

DirectX12.0vs12.0
Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.4vs4.5
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsyes
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i3-3240 3.4GHzvsIntel Core i5-760 2.8GHz
Recommended RAM8 GBvs8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1600x900vs1920x1080

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewRadeon HD 7750 Crossfire is a solution of two Radeon HD 7750 put together using AMD'S Crossfire technology.
Check the page of Radeon HD 7750 to know more about its chip.
Crossfire relies a lot on proper driver support and may suffer from micro-stuttering in lower frame rates (below 30). Benchmarks indicate the performance is overall, is up around 60% better a single Radeon HD 7750 performing by itself but at times (depending whether or not the 3D game supports crossfire or in the graphics driver) it performed worse than a single Radeon HD 7750. Expect this combination to draw up to 110 Watt though the average power consumption should be slightly lower.
Most demanding games will run at the highest settings.
GeForce GTX 465 is a high-end GPU based on the 40nm Fermi architecture.
It's based on the Fermi GF100 Core (optimized GF104 Core) and offers 352 Shader Processing Units, 42 TMUs and 32 ROPs, on 256-bit memory interface of fast GDDR5. The central unit runs at 607MHz and the memory clock operates at 802MHz.
Despite feature more Shader Processing Units than GeForce GTX 460, it's lower clocked. Benchmarks indicate that its performance is around 3% better than the standard version and therefore on level with GeForce GTX 460 v2.
Most modern demanding games will run at the highest settings using a 1080p resolution. However, some will require reduced settings to be played optimally.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
GPU Variants
-