Recommended System Requirements | ||
---|---|---|
Game | GeForce GTX 460 SLI | FirePro W9000 |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 113% | 106% |
Hitman 3 | 177% | 168% |
Assassins Creed: Valhalla | 95% | 89% |
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War | 89% | 83% |
FIFA 21 | 8% | 4% |
Grand Theft Auto VI | 200% | 190% |
Far Cry 6 | 208% | 199% |
Genshin Impact | 113% | 106% |
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands | 206% | 196% |
Battlefield 6 | 177% | 168% |
In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD FirePro W9000 are marginally better than the Nvidia GeForce GTX 460 SLI.
The FirePro W9000 has a 300 MHz higher core clock speed and 16 more Texture Mapping Units than the GTX 460. This results in the FirePro W9000 providing 49.2 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.
The FirePro W9000 has a 300 MHz higher core clock speed than the GTX 460, but the GTX 460 has 32 more Render Output Units than the FirePro W9000. As a result, the GTX 460 exhibits a 12 GPixel/s better Pixel Fill Rate than the FirePro W9000. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.
The FirePro W9000 was released over a year more recently than the GTX 460, and so the FirePro W9000 is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the GTX 460.
Both GPUs exhibit very powerful performance, so it probably isn't worth upgrading from one to the other, as both are capable of running even the most demanding games at the highest settings.
The FirePro W9000 has 4096 MB more video memory than the GTX 460, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the FirePro W9000 also has superior memory performance overall.
The FirePro W9000 has 33.6 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GTX 460, which means that the memory performance of the FirePro W9000 is noticeably better than the GTX 460.
The GeForce GTX 460 SLI has 672 Shader Processing Units and the FirePro W9000 has 2048. However, the actual shader performance of the GTX 460 is 907 and the actual shader performance of the FirePro W9000 is 1298. The FirePro W9000 having 391 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the FirePro W9000 delivers a significantly smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the GTX 460.
The FirePro W9000 transistor size technology is 12 nm (nanometers) smaller than the GTX 460. This means that the FirePro W9000 is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the GTX 460. While they exhibit similar graphical performance, the FirePro W9000 should consume less power than the GTX 460.
The GeForce GTX 460 SLI requires 380 Watts to run and the FirePro W9000 requires 274 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 600 Watts for the GTX 460 and a PSU with at least 600 Watts for the FirePro W9000. The GTX 460 requires 106 Watts more than the FirePro W9000 to run. The difference is significant enough that the GTX 460 may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the FirePro W9000.
Core Speed | 675 MHz | vs | ![]() | 975 MHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Boost Clock | - | vs | - | ||
Architecture | Fermi GF104-300-KB-A1 (x2) | Tahiti XT | |||
OC Potential | None |
![]() |
vs | - | |
Driver Support | Poor |
![]() | vs | - | |
Release Date | 01 Jul 2010 | vs | ![]() | 01 Aug 2012 | |
GPU Link | GD Link | GD Link | |||
Approved | ![]() | ![]() | |||
Comparison |
1366x768 | 10
|
![]() |
vs | - | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1600x900 | 9.1
|
![]() |
vs | - | |
1920x1080 | 7.3
|
![]() |
vs | - | |
2560x1440 | 4.3
|
![]() |
vs | - | |
3840x2160 | - | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
- |
Memory | 2048 MB | vs | ![]() | 6144 MB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Memory Speed | 900 MHz | vs | ![]() | 1375 MHz | |
Memory Bus | 512 Bit | ![]() | vs | 384 Bit | |
Memory Type | GDDR5 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | GDDR5 |
Memory Bandwidth | 230.4GB/sec | vs | ![]() | 264GB/sec | |
L2 Cache | 1024 KB | ![]() |
vs | - | |
Delta Color Compression | no | vs | no | ||
Memory Performance | 0% | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
0% |
Comparison |
Shader Processing Units | 672 | vs | ![]() | 2048 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual Shader Performance | 44% | vs | ![]() | 62% | |
Technology | 40nm | vs | ![]() | 28nm | |
Texture Mapping Units | 112 | vs | ![]() | 128 | |
Texture Rate | 75.6 GTexel/s | vs | ![]() | 124.8 GTexel/s | |
Render Output Units | 64 | ![]() | vs | 32 | |
Pixel Rate | 43.2 GPixel/s | ![]() | vs | 31.2 GPixel/s | |
Comparison |
Max Digital Resolution (WxH) | 2560x1600 | vs | ![]() | 4096x2160 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGA Connections | 0 | vs | 0 | ||
DVI Connections | 4 | ![]() | vs | 0 | |
HDMI Connections | 2 | ![]() | vs | 0 | |
DisplayPort Connections | - | vs | - | ||
Comparison |
Max Power | 380 Watts | vs | ![]() | 274 Watts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended PSU | 600 Watts & 26 Amps | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 600 Watts & 42 Amps |
DirectX | 12.0 | ![]() | vs | 11.1 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shader Model | 5.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 5.0 |
Open GL | 4.5 | ![]() | vs | 4.2 | |
Open CL | - | vs | - | ||
Notebook GPU | no | no | |||
SLI/Crossfire | no | vs | ![]() | yes | |
Dedicated | yes | ![]() | vs | ![]() | yes |
Comparison |
Recommended Processor | - | - | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended RAM | 8 GB | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 8 GB |
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution | 1920x1080 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1920x1080 |
Performance Value | ![]() |
---|
Mini Review | GeForce GTX 460 SLI is a solution of two GeForce GTX 460 put together using NVIDIA'S SLI technology. SLI relies a lot on proper driver support and may cause micro stuttering in FPS below 30. This means this combination might even perform worse than a single GTX 460. The optimal performance it delivers is slightly better than a single GeForce GTX 480. Therefore, this combination is sufficient for gaming at 1080p and most demanding games can be played at the highest settings. | FirePro W9000 is a server GPU based on the 28nm GCN architecture. It's based on the Tahiti XT Core (same used on 7970) and therefore offers 2048 Shader Processing Units, 128 TMUs and 32 ROPs on a 384-bit interface of fast GDDR5. The central unit is clocked 975MHz while the memory clock operates at 1375MHZ. Compared to Radeon HD 7970, its central unit is slightly higher clocked but overall its gaming performance is lower than Radeon HD 7970 because Radeon HD 7970 benefits from certified gaming drivers which unlock the GCN's architecture potential while FirePro W9000 is made for professional applications. Therefore, expect its performance to be between 1% and 3% worse than Radeon HD 7970. |
---|
Recommended CPU | - | - | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Possible GPU Upgrades | - | ||||
GPU Variants | - | - |