Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game GeForce GTX 765M GeForce GTX 675MX
Cyberpunk 2077 265% 176%
Hitman 3 374% 259%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 233% 152%
Resident Evil 8 265% 176%
FIFA 21 84% 39%
Grand Theft Auto VI 413% 288%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 223% 144%
Genshin Impact 265% 176%
The Medium 355% 244%
Far Cry 6 427% 299%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 675MX are noticeably better than the Nvidia GeForce GTX 765M.

The GeForce GTX 765M has a 250 MHz higher core clock speed but 16 fewer Texture Mapping Units than the GeForce GTX 675MX. The lower TMU count doesn't matter, though, as altogether the GeForce GTX 765M manages to provide 6.4 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The GeForce GTX 765M has a 250 MHz higher core clock speed than the GeForce GTX 675MX, but the GeForce GTX 675MX has 16 more Render Output Units than the GeForce GTX 765M. As a result, the GeForce GTX 675MX exhibits a 5.6 GPixel/s better Pixel Fill Rate than the GeForce GTX 765M. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The GeForce GTX 765M was released less than a year after the GeForce GTX 675MX, and so they are likely to have similar driver support for optimizing performance when running the latest games.

The GeForce GTX 765M and the GeForce GTX 675MX have the same amount of video memory, but are likely to provide slightly different experiences when displaying game textures at high resolutions.

The GeForce GTX 675MX has 51.1 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GeForce GTX 765M, which means that the memory performance of the GeForce GTX 675MX is much better than the GeForce GTX 765M.

The GeForce GTX 765M has 768 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GTX 675MX has 960. However, the actual shader performance of the GeForce GTX 765M is 653 and the actual shader performance of the GeForce GTX 675MX is 576. The GeForce GTX 765M having 77 better shader performance is not particularly notable, as altogether the GeForce GTX 675MX performs better when taking into account other relevant data.

The GeForce GTX 765M requires 65 Watts to run and the GeForce GTX 675MX requires 100 Watts. The GeForce GTX 675MX requires 35 Watts more than the GeForce GTX 765M to run. The difference is significant enough that the GeForce GTX 675MX may have a slight adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the GeForce GTX 765M.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed850 MHzvs600 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureKepler GK106-N14E-GE-B-A1Kepler GK104-N13E-GSR-A2
OC Potential Fair vs Fair
Driver Support Good vs Good
Release Date30 May 2013vs01 Oct 2012
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768
8.9
vs green tick
10
1600x900
7
vs green tick
8.2
1920x1080
5.5
vs green tick
6.4
2560x1440
3.7
vs green tick
4.3
3840x2160
2.4
vs green tick
2.7

GPU Memory

Memory2048 MBvs2048 MB
Memory Speed1002 MHzvs900 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs256 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth64.1GB/secvs115.2GB/sec
L2 Cache 256 KB vs green tick 512 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units768vs960
Actual Shader Performance31%vs28%
Technology28nmvs28nm
Texture Mapping Units64vs80
Texture Rate54.4 GTexel/svs48 GTexel/s
Render Output Units16vs32
Pixel Rate13.6 GPixel/svs19.2 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)4096x2160vs4096x2160
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections0vs0
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power65 Wattsvs100 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX12.0vs12.0
Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.5vs4.5
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes
SLI/Crossfireyesvsyes
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i7-3630QM 4-Core 2.4GHzvsIntel Core i7-3610QM 4-Core 2.3GHz
Recommended RAM8 GBvs8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1600x900vs1920x1080

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
GeForce GTX 760M is a Performance Mobile Graphics Card based on the first revision of the Kepler Architecture.

Architecture
The Kepler Architecture was NVIDIA's big step to power efficiency. Each Stream Multiprocessor (SMX) now hosts 192 Shader Processing Units - against the 48 of older Fermi Architecture, and has been redesigned being now clocked at the same speed of the Central Unit. This means they are more energy efficient and will consequently lead to cooler operating temperatures. However, it also means they are weaker. It can be said that one Fermi SMX is as fast as 2 Kepler SMXs.
Additionally, and not available in all GPUs, Kepler also introduced the Boost Clock Feature. The Boost Clock is an even higher Clock Speed activated when in gaming mode and becomes the effective speed of the GPU.

GPU
It equips a GPU Codenamed GK106-N14E-GE-B-A1 which has 4 Stream Multiprocessors activated and thus offers 768 Shader Processing Units, 64 TMUs and 16 ROPs. The Central Unit is clocked at 850MHz.

Memory
The GPU accesses a 2GB frame buffer of fast GDDR5, through a 128-bit memory interface. The size of the frame buffer is exaggerated and no way benefits the GPU. The Memory Clock Operates at 1002MHz.

Features
DirectX 11.0 Support (11.0 Hardware Default) and support for SLI, Kepler Boost, Optimus, CUDA, OpenCL, DirectCompute, 3D Vision Surround, PhysX, Realtime Raytracing and other technologies

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 65W, it is suited for large laptops.

Performance
Despite being underclocked, when compared to GeForce GTX 650 Ti, GeForce GTX 765M ends up performing better in most cases as fast since the Kepler Boost 2.0 Technology allows an even higher Central Unit Speed, which most times exceeds the 950MHz.
Gaming benchmarks indicate its performance is on average with the desktop GeForce GTX 650 Ti.

System Suggestions
We recommend a Powerful Processor (Intel Core i7 Mobile) and 8GB of RAM for a system with GeForce GTX 765M.
Overview
GeForce GTX 675MX is a High-End Mobile Graphics Card based on the first revision of the Kepler Architecture.

Architecture
The Kepler Architecture was NVIDIA's big step to power efficiency. Each Stream Multiprocessor (SMX) now hosts 192 Shader Processing Units - against the 48 of older Fermi Architecture, and has been redesigned being now clocked at the same speed of the Central Unit. This means they are more energy efficient and will consequently lead to cooler operating temperatures. However, it also means they are weaker. It can be said that one Fermi SMX is as fast as 2 Kepler SMXs.
Additionally, and not available in all GPUs, Kepler also introduced the Boost Clock Feature. The Boost Clock is an even higher Clock Speed activated when in gaming mode and becomes the effective speed of the GPU.

GPU
It equips a GPU Codenamed Kepler GK104-N13E-GSR-A2 which has 5 Stream Multiprocessors activated and thus offers 960 Shader Processing Units, 80 TMUs and 32 ROPs. The Central Unit is clocked at 600MHz.

Memory
The GPU accesses a 2GB frame buffer of fast GDDR5, through a 256-bit memory interface. The size of the frame buffer is adequate. The Memory Clock Operates at 900MHz.

Features
DirectX 11.0 Support (11.0 Hardware Default) and support for SLI, Optimus, CUDA, OpenCL, DirectCompute, 3D Vision Surround, PhysX, Realtime Raytracing and other technologies

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 100W, it is suited for very large sized laptops.

Performance
Gaming benchmarks indicate is not too far from the desktop GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost Edition.

System Suggestions
We recommend a Power Processor (Intel Core i7 Mobile) and 8GB of RAM for a system with GeForce GTX 675MX.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-