Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game GeForce GTX 765M GeForce GTX 760M SLI
Cyberpunk 2077 265% 146%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 233% 125%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 223% 117%
Hitman 3 374% 220%
Grand Theft Auto VI 413% 246%
FIFA 21 84% 24%
Far Cry 6 427% 255%
Genshin Impact 265% 146%
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands 423% 252%
Watch Dogs Legion 252% 137%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 760M SLI are significantly better than the Nvidia GeForce GTX 765M.

The GeForce GTX 765M has a 222 MHz higher core clock speed than the GTX 760M, but the GTX 760M has 64 more Texture Mapping Units than the GeForce GTX 765M. As a result, the GTX 760M exhibits a 26 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the GeForce GTX 765M. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The GeForce GTX 765M has a 222 MHz higher core clock speed than the GTX 760M, but the GTX 760M has 16 more Render Output Units than the GeForce GTX 765M. As a result, the GTX 760M exhibits a 6.5 GPixel/s better Pixel Fill Rate than the GeForce GTX 765M. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

Both the GeForce GTX 765M and the GeForce GTX 760M SLI were released at the same time, so are likely to be quite similar.

The GTX 760M has 2048 MB more video memory than the GeForce GTX 765M, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the GTX 760M also has superior memory performance overall.

The GTX 760M has 63.9 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GeForce GTX 765M, which means that the memory performance of the GTX 760M is much better than the GeForce GTX 765M.

The GeForce GTX 765M has 768 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GTX 760M SLI has 1536. However, the actual shader performance of the GeForce GTX 765M is 653 and the actual shader performance of the GTX 760M is 1009. The GTX 760M having 356 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the GTX 760M delivers a massively smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the GeForce GTX 765M.

The GeForce GTX 765M requires 65 Watts to run and the GeForce GTX 760M SLI requires 100 Watts. The GTX 760M requires 35 Watts more than the GeForce GTX 765M to run. The difference is significant enough that the GTX 760M may have a slight adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the GeForce GTX 765M.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed850 MHzvs628 MHz
Boost Clock-vs657 MHz
ArchitectureKepler GK106-N14E-GE-B-A1Kepler GK106-N14E-GL-A1 (x2)
OC Potential Fair vs Fair
Driver Support Good vs Good
Release Date30 May 2013vs30 May 2013
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768
8.9
vs green tick
10
1600x900
7
vs green tick
9.1
1920x1080
5.5
vs green tick
6.7
2560x1440
3.7
vs green tick
4.9
3840x2160
2.4
vs green tick
3.2

GPU Memory

Memory2048 MBvs4096 MB
Memory Speed1002 MHzvs1000 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs256 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth64.1GB/secvs128GB/sec
L2 Cache 256 KB vs green tick 512 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units768vs1536
Actual Shader Performance31%vs49%
Technology28nmvs28nm
Texture Mapping Units64vs128
Texture Rate54.4 GTexel/svs80.4 GTexel/s
Render Output Units16vs32
Pixel Rate13.6 GPixel/svs20.1 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)4096x2160vs4096x2160
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections0vs0
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs0
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power65 Wattsvs100 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX12.0vs12.0
Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.5vs4.5
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes
SLI/Crossfireyesvsyes
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i7-3630QM 4-Core 2.4GHzvsIntel Core i7-3610QM 4-Core 2.3GHz
Recommended RAM8 GBvs8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1600x900vs1920x1080

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
GeForce GTX 760M is a Performance Mobile Graphics Card based on the first revision of the Kepler Architecture.

Architecture
The Kepler Architecture was NVIDIA's big step to power efficiency. Each Stream Multiprocessor (SMX) now hosts 192 Shader Processing Units - against the 48 of older Fermi Architecture, and has been redesigned being now clocked at the same speed of the Central Unit. This means they are more energy efficient and will consequently lead to cooler operating temperatures. However, it also means they are weaker. It can be said that one Fermi SMX is as fast as 2 Kepler SMXs.
Additionally, and not available in all GPUs, Kepler also introduced the Boost Clock Feature. The Boost Clock is an even higher Clock Speed activated when in gaming mode and becomes the effective speed of the GPU.

GPU
It equips a GPU Codenamed GK106-N14E-GE-B-A1 which has 4 Stream Multiprocessors activated and thus offers 768 Shader Processing Units, 64 TMUs and 16 ROPs. The Central Unit is clocked at 850MHz.

Memory
The GPU accesses a 2GB frame buffer of fast GDDR5, through a 128-bit memory interface. The size of the frame buffer is exaggerated and no way benefits the GPU. The Memory Clock Operates at 1002MHz.

Features
DirectX 11.0 Support (11.0 Hardware Default) and support for SLI, Kepler Boost, Optimus, CUDA, OpenCL, DirectCompute, 3D Vision Surround, PhysX, Realtime Raytracing and other technologies

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 65W, it is suited for large laptops.

Performance
Despite being underclocked, when compared to GeForce GTX 650 Ti, GeForce GTX 765M ends up performing better in most cases as fast since the Kepler Boost 2.0 Technology allows an even higher Central Unit Speed, which most times exceeds the 950MHz.
Gaming benchmarks indicate its performance is on average with the desktop GeForce GTX 650 Ti.

System Suggestions
We recommend a Powerful Processor (Intel Core i7 Mobile) and 8GB of RAM for a system with GeForce GTX 765M.
Overview
GeForce GTX 760M SLI is a solution of two GeForce GTX 760M put together using NVIDIA's SLI technology.

Architecture
The Kepler Architecture was NVIDIA's big step to power efficiency. Each Stream Multiprocessor (SMX) now hosts 192 Shader Processing Units - against the 48 of older Fermi Architecture, and has been redesigned being now clocked at the same speed of the Central Unit. This means they are more energy efficient and will consequently lead to cooler operating temperatures. However, it also means they are weaker. It can be said that one Fermi SMX is as fast as 2 Kepler SMXs.
Additionally, and not available in all GPUs, Kepler also introduced the Boost Clock Feature. The Boost Clock is an even higher Clock Speed activated when in gaming mode and becomes the effective speed of the GPU.

GPU
It consists of 2 GPUs Codenamed GK106-N14E-GL-A1 which, together, offer 1536 Shader Processing Units, 128 TMUs and 32 ROPs. The central unit runs at 628MHz and goes up to 657MHz, in Turbo Mode.

Memory
Each GPU accesses a 2GB frame buffer of fast GDDR5, through a 128-bit memory interface. The size of the frame buffer is adequate. The Memory Clock Operates at 1000MHz.

Power Consumption
Power Consumption lies between 100W and 150W.

Performance
Because SLI Relies on Proper Driver Support for Scaling, Performance may vary from game to game.
Overall, GeForce GTX 760M SLI should offer Performance Comparable to a single GeForce GTX 680M at 1920x1080.

System Suggestions
GeForce GTX 760M SLI is best suited for resolutions up to and including 1920x1080.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-