Select any two GPUs for comparison

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game GeForce GTX 765M GeForce 9300M G
Cyberpunk 2077 265% 7914%
Hitman 3 374% 10326%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 233% 7230%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 223% 6992%
FIFA 21 84% 3943%
Grand Theft Auto VI 413% 11177%
Far Cry 6 427% 11496%
Genshin Impact 265% 7914%
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands 423% 11389%
Battlefield 6 374% 10326%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 765M are massively better than the Nvidia GeForce 9300M G.

The GeForce GTX 765M was released over three years more recently than the GeForce 9300M G, and so the GeForce GTX 765M is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the GeForce 9300M G when running the latest games.

The GeForce GTX 765M has 1792 MB more video memory than the GeForce 9300M G, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the GeForce GTX 765M also has superior memory performance overall.

The GeForce GTX 765M has 54.5 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GeForce 9300M G, which means that the memory performance of the GeForce GTX 765M is much better than the GeForce 9300M G.

The GeForce GTX 765M has 768 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce 9300M G has 16. However, the actual shader performance of the GeForce GTX 765M is 653. The GeForce GTX 765M having 637 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the GeForce GTX 765M delivers a massively smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the GeForce 9300M G.

The GeForce GTX 765M transistor size technology is 52 nm (nanometers) smaller than the GeForce 9300M G. This means that the GeForce GTX 765M is expected to run massively cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the GeForce 9300M G.

The GeForce GTX 765M requires 65 Watts to run and the GeForce 9300M G requires 13 Watts. The GeForce GTX 765M requires 52 Watts more than the GeForce 9300M G to run. The difference is significant enough that the GeForce GTX 765M may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the GeForce 9300M G.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed850 MHzvs400 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureKepler GK106-N14E-GE-B-A1G86
OC Potential Fair vs -
Driver Support Good vs -
Release Date30 May 2013vs02 Jan 2008
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link

Resolution Performance

green tick vs -
green tick vs -
green tick vs -
green tick vs -
green tick vs -

GPU Memory

Memory2048 MBvs256 MB
Memory Speed1002 MHzvs600 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs64 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5vsGDDR3
Memory Bandwidth64.1GB/secvs9.6GB/sec
L2 Cache 256 KB green tick vs 0 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units768vs16
Actual Shader Performance31%vs1%
Texture Mapping Units64vs-
Texture Rate54.4 GTexel/svs-
Render Output Units16vs-
Pixel Rate13.6 GPixel/svs-

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)4096x2160vs2560x1600
VGA Connections0vs-
DVI Connections0vs-
HDMI Connections0vs-
DisplayPort Connections-vs-

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power65 Wattsvs13 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

Shader Model5.0vs4.0
Open GL4.5vs2.1
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i7-3630QM 4-Core 2.4GHz-
Recommended RAM8 GB-
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1600x900-

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
GeForce GTX 760M is a Performance Mobile Graphics Card based on the first revision of the Kepler Architecture.

The Kepler Architecture was NVIDIA's big step to power efficiency. Each Stream Multiprocessor (SMX) now hosts 192 Shader Processing Units - against the 48 of older Fermi Architecture, and has been redesigned being now clocked at the same speed of the Central Unit. This means they are more energy efficient and will consequently lead to cooler operating temperatures. However, it also means they are weaker. It can be said that one Fermi SMX is as fast as 2 Kepler SMXs.
Additionally, and not available in all GPUs, Kepler also introduced the Boost Clock Feature. The Boost Clock is an even higher Clock Speed activated when in gaming mode and becomes the effective speed of the GPU.

It equips a GPU Codenamed GK106-N14E-GE-B-A1 which has 4 Stream Multiprocessors activated and thus offers 768 Shader Processing Units, 64 TMUs and 16 ROPs. The Central Unit is clocked at 850MHz.

The GPU accesses a 2GB frame buffer of fast GDDR5, through a 128-bit memory interface. The size of the frame buffer is exaggerated and no way benefits the GPU. The Memory Clock Operates at 1002MHz.

DirectX 11.0 Support (11.0 Hardware Default) and support for SLI, Kepler Boost, Optimus, CUDA, OpenCL, DirectCompute, 3D Vision Surround, PhysX, Realtime Raytracing and other technologies

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 65W, it is suited for large laptops.

Despite being underclocked, when compared to GeForce GTX 650 Ti, GeForce GTX 765M ends up performing better in most cases as fast since the Kepler Boost 2.0 Technology allows an even higher Central Unit Speed, which most times exceeds the 950MHz.
Gaming benchmarks indicate its performance is on average with the desktop GeForce GTX 650 Ti.

System Suggestions
We recommend a Powerful Processor (Intel Core i7 Mobile) and 8GB of RAM for a system with GeForce GTX 765M.
For the graphics-intensive features you need to enjoy home-theater quality video, use the latest productivity applications, play hot new PC games, and enjoy the ultimate Windows Vista experience, make sure your performance notebook is equipped with an NVIDIA GeForce 9300M G graphics processing unit (GPU). This product is also enabled for CUDA applications and is NVIDIA PhysX-ready.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
GPU Variants