Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game GeForce GTX 765M Mobility Radeon 9200
Cyberpunk 2077 265% 8148%
Hitman 3 374% 10630%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 233% 7444%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 223% 7199%
FIFA 21 84% 4061%
Grand Theft Auto VI 413% 11506%
Far Cry 6 427% 11834%
Genshin Impact 265% 8148%
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands 423% 11725%
Battlefield 6 374% 10630%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 765M are massively better than the AMD Mobility Radeon 9200.

The GeForce GTX 765M was released over three years more recently than the Mobility Radeon 9200, and so the GeForce GTX 765M is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the Mobility Radeon 9200 when running the latest games.

The GeForce GTX 765M has 1984 MB more video memory than the Mobility Radeon 9200, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the GeForce GTX 765M also has superior memory performance overall.

The GeForce GTX 765M has 60.9 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the Mobility Radeon 9200, which means that the memory performance of the GeForce GTX 765M is much better than the Mobility Radeon 9200.

The GeForce GTX 765M has 768 Shader Processing Units and the Mobility Radeon 9200 has 1. However, the actual shader performance of the GeForce GTX 765M is 653 and the actual shader performance of the Mobility Radeon 9200 is 0. The GeForce GTX 765M having 653 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the GeForce GTX 765M delivers a massively smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the Mobility Radeon 9200.

The GeForce GTX 765M requires 65 Watts to run but there is no entry for the Mobility Radeon 9200.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed850 MHzvs250 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureKepler GK106-N14E-GE-B-A1RV280
OC Potential Fair vs -
Driver Support Good vs -
Release Date30 May 2013vs01 Mar 2003
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768
8.9
green tick vs -
1600x900
7
green tick vs -
1920x1080
5.5
green tick vs -
2560x1440
3.7
green tick vs -
3840x2160
2.4
green tick vs -

GPU Memory

Memory2048 MBvs64 MB
Memory Speed1002 MHzvs200 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5vsDDR
Memory Bandwidth64.1GB/secvs3.2GB/sec
L2 Cache 256 KB green tick vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units768vs1
Actual Shader Performance31%vs-
Technology28nmvs-
Texture Mapping Units64vs-
Texture Rate54.4 GTexel/svs-
Render Output Units16vs-
Pixel Rate13.6 GPixel/svs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)4096x2160vs2048x1536
VGA Connections0vs-
DVI Connections0vs-
HDMI Connections0vs-
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power65 Watts-
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX12.0vs8.1
Shader Model5.0vs1.4
Open GL4.5vs1.4
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes
SLI/Crossfireyesvsno
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i7-3630QM 4-Core 2.4GHz-
Recommended RAM8 GB-
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1600x900-

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
GeForce GTX 760M is a Performance Mobile Graphics Card based on the first revision of the Kepler Architecture.

Architecture
The Kepler Architecture was NVIDIA's big step to power efficiency. Each Stream Multiprocessor (SMX) now hosts 192 Shader Processing Units - against the 48 of older Fermi Architecture, and has been redesigned being now clocked at the same speed of the Central Unit. This means they are more energy efficient and will consequently lead to cooler operating temperatures. However, it also means they are weaker. It can be said that one Fermi SMX is as fast as 2 Kepler SMXs.
Additionally, and not available in all GPUs, Kepler also introduced the Boost Clock Feature. The Boost Clock is an even higher Clock Speed activated when in gaming mode and becomes the effective speed of the GPU.

GPU
It equips a GPU Codenamed GK106-N14E-GE-B-A1 which has 4 Stream Multiprocessors activated and thus offers 768 Shader Processing Units, 64 TMUs and 16 ROPs. The Central Unit is clocked at 850MHz.

Memory
The GPU accesses a 2GB frame buffer of fast GDDR5, through a 128-bit memory interface. The size of the frame buffer is exaggerated and no way benefits the GPU. The Memory Clock Operates at 1002MHz.

Features
DirectX 11.0 Support (11.0 Hardware Default) and support for SLI, Kepler Boost, Optimus, CUDA, OpenCL, DirectCompute, 3D Vision Surround, PhysX, Realtime Raytracing and other technologies

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 65W, it is suited for large laptops.

Performance
Despite being underclocked, when compared to GeForce GTX 650 Ti, GeForce GTX 765M ends up performing better in most cases as fast since the Kepler Boost 2.0 Technology allows an even higher Central Unit Speed, which most times exceeds the 950MHz.
Gaming benchmarks indicate its performance is on average with the desktop GeForce GTX 650 Ti.

System Suggestions
We recommend a Powerful Processor (Intel Core i7 Mobile) and 8GB of RAM for a system with GeForce GTX 765M.
Notebook PCs based on AMD's mainstream notebook platform are designed to deliver real entertainment with the ultimate in HD visual performance. Superior technologies are optimized to create an immersive visual experience with improved graphics performance, fast wireless and long battery life. Add in more notebook PC choices from leading PC manufacturers and you get an incredible value one that you can only get from AMD.
Recommended CPU
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-