Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Intel HD Graphics 4400 Desktop FireGL V7600
Cyberpunk 2077 1682% 1881%
Call of Duty Warzone 1197% 1342%
Minecraft: Dungeons 1270% 1423%
Valorant 27% 42%
Grand Theft Auto VI 1882% 2104%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 1682% 1881%
Doom Eternal 1221% 1369%
Maneater 1015% 1140%
Mount and Blade 2: Bannerlord 1148% 1288%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 1112% 1248%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Intel HD Graphics 4400 Desktop are very slightly better than the AMD FireGL V7600.

The Graphics 4400 has no core clock speed set, so any comparison between Texture and Pixel Fill Rates is not currently possible.

The Graphics 4400 was released over three years more recently than the FireGL V7600, and so the Graphics 4400 is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the FireGL V7600 when running the latest games.

The FireGL V7600 has 512 MB video memory, but the Graphics 4400 does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The HD Graphics 4400 Desktop has 80 Shader Processing Units and the FireGL V7600 has 240. However, the actual shader performance of the Graphics 4400 is 0 and the actual shader performance of the FireGL V7600 is 94. The FireGL V7600 having 94 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the FireGL V7600 delivers a slightly smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the Graphics 4400.

We would recommend a PSU with at least 350 Watts for the FireGL V7600, but we do not have a recommended PSU wattage for the Graphics 4400.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed-vs600 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureHaswell: GT1-
OC Potential - vs -
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date05 Jun 2013vs01 Jan 2007
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768
5.1
green tick vs -
1600x900
3.5
green tick vs -
1920x1080
2.4
green tick vs -
2560x1440
1.8
green tick vs -
3840x2160
1.3
green tick vs -

GPU Memory

MemoryN/Avs512 MB
Memory Speed800 MHzvs800 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs256 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3vsGDDR3
Memory Bandwidth25.6GB/secvs51.2GB/sec
L2 Cache - vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units80vs240
Actual Shader Performance-vs5%
Technology22nmvs-
Texture Mapping Units4vs-
Texture Rate-vs-
Render Output Units22vs-
Pixel Rate-vs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)2560x1600vs2560x1600
VGA Connections0vs1
DVI Connections0vs1
HDMI Connections0vs1
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power--
Recommended PSU-350 Watts

GPU Features

DirectX11.1vs10
Shader Model5.0vs4.0
Open GL4.0vs2.1
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatednovsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewIntel HD Graphics 4400 Desktop is a variant of Intel HD Graphics 4600 Desktop, for ULV processors.
It features 20 Execution Units (80 Shader Processing Units) and its central-unit speed will range between XXXMHz and 1150MHz (Turbo Boost) and that the fastest memory supported is DDR3-1600 meaning its memory-clock will operate at 800MHz, at the most.
Compared to Intel HD Graphics 4600 Desktop, its performance is only slightly lower but its TDP is significantly lower.
The ATI FireGL range of video cards, renamed to FirePro 3D in late 2008, is the series specifically for CAD (Computer Aided Design) and DCC (Digital Content Creation) software, usually found in workstations. The FireGL line is designed for multimedia content creation programs, such as 3DS Max, and mechanical engineering design software such as Solidworks, whereas Radeon counterparts are suited towards video games. FireGL drivers were built with maximum image quality and pixel precision, with CAD specific functionalities such as the recently introduced AutoDetection Technology to tune the parameters inside the driver to achieve maximum performance for predefined list of software. However, because the drivers are also based on the Catalyst drivers made for the Radeon line, it makes them suitable for gaming, at the expense of probable compatibility issues with the very latest games due to the age of the drivers, with FireGL cards in theory pushing more data than their Radeon gaming counterparts.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-