Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Intel HD Graphics 4400 Desktop Quadro FX 580
Cyberpunk 2077 1682% 2663%
Call of Duty Warzone 1197% 1911%
Minecraft: Dungeons 1270% 2024%
Valorant 27% 97%
Grand Theft Auto VI 1882% 2973%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 1682% 2663%
Doom Eternal 1221% 1949%
Maneater 1015% 1629%
Mount and Blade 2: Bannerlord 1148% 1836%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 1112% 1780%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Intel HD Graphics 4400 Desktop are significantly better than the Nvidia Quadro FX 580.

The Graphics 4400 has no core clock speed set, so any comparison between Texture and Pixel Fill Rates is not currently possible.

The Graphics 4400 was released over three years more recently than the Quadro FX 580, and so the Graphics 4400 is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the Quadro FX 580 when running the latest games.

The Quadro FX 580 has 512 MB video memory, but the Graphics 4400 does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The HD Graphics 4400 Desktop has 80 Shader Processing Units and the Quadro FX 580 has 32. However, the actual shader performance of the Graphics 4400 is 0 and the actual shader performance of the Quadro FX 580 is 14. The Quadro FX 580 having 14 better shader performance is not particularly notable, as altogether the Graphics 4400 performs better when taking into account other relevant data.

The Quadro FX 580 requires 40 Watts to run but there is no entry for the Graphics 4400. We would recommend a PSU with at least 450 Watts for the Quadro FX 580, but we do not have a recommended PSU wattage for the Graphics 4400.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed-vs450 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureHaswell: GT1G96
OC Potential - vs Poor
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date05 Jun 2013vs09 Apr 2009
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768
5.1
green tick vs -
1600x900
3.5
green tick vs -
1920x1080
2.4
green tick vs -
2560x1440
1.8
green tick vs -
3840x2160
1.3
green tick vs -

GPU Memory

MemoryN/Avs512 MB
Memory Speed800 MHzvs800 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3vsGDDR3
Memory Bandwidth25.6GB/secvs25.6GB/sec
L2 Cache - vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units80vs32
Actual Shader Performance-vs1%
Technology22nmvs-
Texture Mapping Units4vs-
Texture Rate-vs-
Render Output Units22vs-
Pixel Rate-vs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)2560x1600vs2560x1600
VGA Connections0vs1
DVI Connections0vs2
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power-40 Watts
Recommended PSU-450 Watts

GPU Features

DirectX11.1vs10
Shader Model5.0vs4.0
Open GL4.0vs3.0
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatednovsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewIntel HD Graphics 4400 Desktop is a variant of Intel HD Graphics 4600 Desktop, for ULV processors.
It features 20 Execution Units (80 Shader Processing Units) and its central-unit speed will range between XXXMHz and 1150MHz (Turbo Boost) and that the fastest memory supported is DDR3-1600 meaning its memory-clock will operate at 800MHz, at the most.
Compared to Intel HD Graphics 4600 Desktop, its performance is only slightly lower but its TDP is significantly lower.
Enabling EnergyStar compliance, Quadro FX 580 provides extreme power efficiency from a solution with 30-bit color fidelity. Certified on all industry-leading applications and featuring automatic configuration of display settings, Quadro FX 580 delivers optimal performance for maximum productivity.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-