Recommended System Requirements | ||
---|---|---|
Game | Radeon R7 260 | GeForce GTX 650 Ti Power Edition OC 1GB |
Hitman 3 | 345% | 356% |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 242% | 250% |
Assassins Creed: Valhalla | 213% | 221% |
Resident Evil 8 | 242% | 250% |
FIFA 21 | 73% | 77% |
Grand Theft Auto VI | 382% | 393% |
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War | 203% | 210% |
Genshin Impact | 242% | 250% |
Far Cry 6 | 395% | 407% |
The Medium | 327% | 337% |
In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon R7 260 are marginally better than the Nvidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti Power Edition OC 1GB.
The Radeon R7 260 has a 7 MHz higher core clock speed than the GTX 650 Ti, but the GTX 650 Ti has 16 more Texture Mapping Units than the Radeon R7 260. As a result, the GTX 650 Ti exhibits a 15.6 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the Radeon R7 260. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.
The Radeon R7 260 has a 7 MHz higher core clock speed than the GTX 650 Ti and the same number of Render Output Units. This results in the Radeon R7 260 providing 0.1 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.
The Radeon R7 260 was released over a year more recently than the GTX 650 Ti, and so the Radeon R7 260 is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the GTX 650 Ti.
The Radeon R7 260 has 1024 MB more video memory than the GTX 650 Ti, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the Radeon R7 260 also has superior memory performance overall.
The Radeon R7 260 has 9.6 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GTX 650 Ti, which means that the memory performance of the Radeon R7 260 is marginally better than the GTX 650 Ti.
Both the Radeon R7 260 and the GeForce GTX 650 Ti Power Edition OC 1GB have 768 Shader Processing Units. While the two GPUs have the same number of SPUs, the actual performance delivered by the GTX 650 Ti is 763 and by the Radeon R7 260 is 763. Knowing that the shader performance of the GTX 650 Ti is superior, it is not necessary to examine the GPUs' respective Texture and Pixel Fill Rates.
The Radeon R7 260 requires 95 Watts to run but there is no entry for the GeForce GTX 650 Ti Power Edition OC 1GB. We would recommend a PSU with at least 450 Watts for the Radeon R7 260.
Core Speed | 1000 MHz | ![]() | vs | 993 MHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Boost Clock | - | vs | - | ||
Architecture | GCN 1.1 Bonaire PRO | Kepler GK106-220-A1 | |||
OC Potential | Fair |
![]() |
vs |
![]() | Fair |
Driver Support | Great |
![]() | vs | Good | |
Release Date | 17 Dec 2013 | ![]() | vs | 01 Oct 2012 | |
GPU Link | GD Link | GD Link | |||
Approved | ![]() | ![]() | |||
Comparison |
1366x768 | 9.7
|
![]() |
vs | - | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1600x900 | 7.5
|
![]() |
vs | 7.2
|
|
1920x1080 | 5.7
|
![]() |
vs | 5.6
|
|
2560x1440 | 4
|
![]() |
vs | 3.9
|
|
3840x2160 | 2.4
|
vs | ![]() |
2.5
|
Memory | 2048 MB | ![]() | vs | 1024 MB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Memory Speed | 1500 MHz | ![]() | vs | 1350 MHz | |
Memory Bus | 128 Bit | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 128 Bit |
Memory Type | GDDR5 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | GDDR5 |
Memory Bandwidth | 96GB/sec | ![]() | vs | 86.4GB/sec | |
L2 Cache | 512 KB | ![]() |
vs | 256 KB | |
Delta Color Compression | no | vs | no | ||
Memory Performance | 0% | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
0% |
Comparison |
Shader Processing Units | 768 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 768 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual Shader Performance | 31% | vs | ![]() | 37% | |
Technology | 28nm | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 28nm |
Texture Mapping Units | 48 | vs | ![]() | 64 | |
Texture Rate | 48 GTexel/s | vs | ![]() | 63.6 GTexel/s | |
Render Output Units | 16 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 16 |
Pixel Rate | 16 GPixel/s | ![]() | vs | 15.9 GPixel/s | |
Comparison |
Max Digital Resolution (WxH) | 4096x2160 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 4096x2160 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGA Connections | 0 | vs | 0 | ||
DVI Connections | 1 | vs | ![]() | 2 | |
HDMI Connections | 1 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1 |
DisplayPort Connections | - | vs | - | ||
Comparison |
Max Power | 95 Watts | - | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended PSU | 450 Watts & 30 Amps | - |
DirectX | 12.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 12.0 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shader Model | 5.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 5.0 |
Open GL | 4.4 | vs | ![]() | 4.5 | |
Open CL | - | vs | - | ||
Notebook GPU | no | no | |||
SLI/Crossfire | yes | ![]() | vs | no | |
Dedicated | yes | ![]() | vs | ![]() | yes |
Comparison |
Recommended Processor | Intel Core i5-3450 3.1GHz | vs | Intel Core i5-3450 3.1GHz | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended RAM | 8 GB | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 8 GB |
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution | 1600x900 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1600x900 |
Performance Value | ![]() |
---|
Mini Review | Radeon R7 260 is a fast-middle-class graphics card based on the Second Revision of the GCN architecture. It packs a Core codenamed Bonaire PRO. The Bonaire PRO is a cut-down version of the Bonaire XT Core used on Radeon HD 7790. It comes with 14 Compute Units and thus offers 768 Shader Processing Units, 48 TMUs and 16 ROPs. This, on a 128-bit memory interface of fast GDDR5. Compared to the Bonaire XT Core, it has support for DirectX 11.2 and has support for AMD's TrueAudio Technology. Benchmarks indicate its performance is around 10% slower than Radeon HD 7790 and a little over that when taking Radeon R7 260X as a reference. The card proves to be very inefficient seeing as it has a higher rated TDP board than Radeon HD 7790 and its release price of $109 makes Radeon HD 7850 a better option. | GeForce GTX 650 Ti Power Edition OC 1GB is a special edition of the fast-middle-class GeForce GTX 650 Ti. This edition features a new and better cooling system called Cyclone II Thermal Design with Dust Removal technology and an increase in the central clock that went from 928MHz to 993MHz. The Memory clock was left untouched. The overclocking is relevant and benchmarks indicate there's a 4% boost when compared to the reference GeForce GTX 650 Ti. |
---|
Recommended CPU | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Possible GPU Upgrades | - | - | |||
GPU Variants | - |