Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Mobility Radeon X1350 GeForce GTX 765M
Cyberpunk 2077 9641% 265%
Hitman 3 12572% 374%
Resident Evil 8 9641% 265%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 8809% 233%
FIFA 21 4814% 84%
Grand Theft Auto VI 13607% 413%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 8521% 223%
Genshin Impact 9641% 265%
Far Cry 6 13995% 427%
The Medium 12055% 355%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 765M are massively better than the AMD Mobility Radeon X1350.

The GeForce GTX 765M has a 431 MHz higher core clock speed and 60 more Texture Mapping Units than the Mobility Radeon X1350. This results in the GeForce GTX 765M providing 52.7 GTexel/s better texturing performance. Neither of these GPUs support DirectX 10 or higher, so Texture Rate holds more weight than when comparing more modern GPUs.

The GeForce GTX 765M has a 431 MHz higher core clock speed and 12 more Render Output Units than the Mobility Radeon X1350. This results in the GeForce GTX 765M providing 11.9 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The GeForce GTX 765M was released over three years more recently than the Mobility Radeon X1350, and so the GeForce GTX 765M is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the Mobility Radeon X1350 when running the latest games.

The GeForce GTX 765M has 1920 MB more video memory than the Mobility Radeon X1350, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the GeForce GTX 765M also has superior memory performance overall.

The GeForce GTX 765M has 57.8 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the Mobility Radeon X1350, which means that the memory performance of the GeForce GTX 765M is much better than the Mobility Radeon X1350.

The Mobility Radeon X1350 has 4 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GTX 765M has 768. However, the actual shader performance of the Mobility Radeon X1350 is 1 and the actual shader performance of the GeForce GTX 765M is 653. The GeForce GTX 765M having 652 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the GeForce GTX 765M delivers a massively smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the Mobility Radeon X1350.

The GeForce GTX 765M transistor size technology is 72 nm (nanometers) smaller than the Mobility Radeon X1350. This means that the GeForce GTX 765M is expected to run massively cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the Mobility Radeon X1350.

The GeForce GTX 765M requires 65 Watts to run but there is no entry for the Mobility Radeon X1350.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed419 MHzvs850 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureM62Kepler GK106-N14E-GE-B-A1
OC Potential Poor vs Fair
Driver Support - vs Good
Release Date18 Sep 2006vs30 May 2013
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768 - vs green tick
8.9
1600x900 - vs green tick
7
1920x1080 - vs green tick
5.5
2560x1440 - vs green tick
3.7
3840x2160 - vs green tick
2.4

GPU Memory

Memory128 MBvs2048 MB
Memory Speed392 MHzvs1002 MHz
Memory Bus64 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeDDR2vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth6.3GB/secvs64.1GB/sec
L2 Cache - vs green tick 256 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units4vs768
Actual Shader Performance0%vs31%
Technology100nmvs28nm
Texture Mapping Units4vs64
Texture Rate1.7 GTexel/svs54.4 GTexel/s
Render Output Units4vs16
Pixel Rate1.7 GPixel/svs13.6 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)-vs4096x2160
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections0vs0
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power-65 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX9.0cvs12.0
Shader Model3.0vs5.0
Open GL3.0vs4.5
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes
SLI/Crossfirenovsyes
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor-Intel Core i7-3630QM 4-Core 2.4GHz
Recommended RAM-8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution-1600x900

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewMobility Radeon X1350 is at essence a higher-clocked Mobility Radeon X1300. Beware that this Graphics Card is based on a NON-Shader Unified architecture and thus DirectX 10 and forth games aren't supported, not even via software.
Its performance, extremely puny, is only capable of running 2005 (and before) games fluently.
Overview
GeForce GTX 760M is a Performance Mobile Graphics Card based on the first revision of the Kepler Architecture.

Architecture
The Kepler Architecture was NVIDIA's big step to power efficiency. Each Stream Multiprocessor (SMX) now hosts 192 Shader Processing Units - against the 48 of older Fermi Architecture, and has been redesigned being now clocked at the same speed of the Central Unit. This means they are more energy efficient and will consequently lead to cooler operating temperatures. However, it also means they are weaker. It can be said that one Fermi SMX is as fast as 2 Kepler SMXs.
Additionally, and not available in all GPUs, Kepler also introduced the Boost Clock Feature. The Boost Clock is an even higher Clock Speed activated when in gaming mode and becomes the effective speed of the GPU.

GPU
It equips a GPU Codenamed GK106-N14E-GE-B-A1 which has 4 Stream Multiprocessors activated and thus offers 768 Shader Processing Units, 64 TMUs and 16 ROPs. The Central Unit is clocked at 850MHz.

Memory
The GPU accesses a 2GB frame buffer of fast GDDR5, through a 128-bit memory interface. The size of the frame buffer is exaggerated and no way benefits the GPU. The Memory Clock Operates at 1002MHz.

Features
DirectX 11.0 Support (11.0 Hardware Default) and support for SLI, Kepler Boost, Optimus, CUDA, OpenCL, DirectCompute, 3D Vision Surround, PhysX, Realtime Raytracing and other technologies

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 65W, it is suited for large laptops.

Performance
Despite being underclocked, when compared to GeForce GTX 650 Ti, GeForce GTX 765M ends up performing better in most cases as fast since the Kepler Boost 2.0 Technology allows an even higher Central Unit Speed, which most times exceeds the 950MHz.
Gaming benchmarks indicate its performance is on average with the desktop GeForce GTX 650 Ti.

System Suggestions
We recommend a Powerful Processor (Intel Core i7 Mobile) and 8GB of RAM for a system with GeForce GTX 765M.
Recommended CPU
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-