Recommended System Requirements | ||
---|---|---|
Game | Radeon R9 290X Crossfire | GeForce GTX 770 Palit JetStream 2GB Edition |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 16% | 44% |
Assassins Creed: Valhalla | 23% | 32% |
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War | 25% | 27% |
Hitman 3 | 10% | 87% |
Grand Theft Auto VI | 19% | 103% |
FIFA 21 | 57% | 27% |
Far Cry 6 | 22% | 108% |
Genshin Impact | 16% | 44% |
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands | 21% | 107% |
Watch Dogs Legion | 19% | 39% |
In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon R9 290X Crossfire are significantly better than the Nvidia GeForce GTX 770 Palit JetStream 2GB Edition.
The GTX 770 has a 150 MHz higher core clock speed than the R9 290X, but the R9 290X has 224 more Texture Mapping Units than the GTX 770. As a result, the R9 290X exhibits a 204.8 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the GTX 770. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.
The GTX 770 has a 150 MHz higher core clock speed than the R9 290X, but the R9 290X has 96 more Render Output Units than the GTX 770. As a result, the R9 290X exhibits a 91.2 GPixel/s better Pixel Fill Rate than the GTX 770. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.
The R9 290X was released less than a year after the GTX 770, and so they are likely to have similar driver support for optimizing performance when running the latest games.
Both GPUs exhibit very powerful performance, so it probably isn't worth upgrading from one to the other, as both are capable of running even the most demanding games at the highest settings.
The R9 290X has 6144 MB more video memory than the GTX 770, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the R9 290X also has superior memory performance overall.
The R9 290X has 415.7 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GTX 770, which means that the memory performance of the R9 290X is massively better than the GTX 770.
The Radeon R9 290X Crossfire has 5632 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GTX 770 Palit JetStream 2GB Edition has 1536. However, the actual shader performance of the R9 290X is 4787 and the actual shader performance of the GTX 770 is 1846. The R9 290X having 2941 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the R9 290X delivers a massively smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the GTX 770.
The Radeon R9 290X Crossfire requires 500 Watts to run but there is no entry for the GeForce GTX 770 Palit JetStream 2GB Edition. We would recommend a PSU with at least 1250 Watts for the R9 290X and a PSU with at least 550 Watts for the GTX 770. The R9 290X has been recommended a PSU with 700 Watts more than the GTX 770. The difference is significant enough that the R9 290X may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the GTX 770.
Core Speed | 1000 MHz | vs | ![]() | 1150 MHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Boost Clock | - | vs | ![]() | 1202 MHz | |
Architecture | GCN 1.1 Hawaii XT (x2) | Kepler GK104-425-A2 | |||
OC Potential | Fair |
![]() |
vs | Poor | |
Driver Support | Great |
![]() | vs | Good | |
Release Date | 24 Oct 2013 | ![]() | vs | 30 May 2013 | |
GPU Link | GD Link | GD Link | |||
Approved | ![]() | ![]() | |||
Comparison |
1366x768 | - | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
- |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1600x900 | - | vs | ![]() |
10
|
|
1920x1080 | 10
|
![]() |
vs | 8.8
|
|
2560x1440 | - | vs | ![]() |
6.4
|
|
3840x2160 | - | vs | ![]() |
4.8
|
Memory | 8192 MB | ![]() | vs | 2048 MB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Memory Speed | 1250 MHz | vs | ![]() | 1752 MHz | |
Memory Bus | 1024 Bit | ![]() | vs | 256 Bit | |
Memory Type | GDDR5 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | GDDR5 |
Memory Bandwidth | 640GB/sec | ![]() | vs | 224.3GB/sec | |
L2 Cache | 2048 KB | ![]() |
vs | 512 KB | |
Delta Color Compression | no | vs | no | ||
Memory Performance | 0% | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
0% |
Comparison |
Shader Processing Units | 5632 | ![]() | vs | 1536 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual Shader Performance | 100% | ![]() | vs | 89% | |
Technology | 28nm | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 28nm |
Texture Mapping Units | 352 | ![]() | vs | 128 | |
Texture Rate | 352 GTexel/s | ![]() | vs | 147.2 GTexel/s | |
Render Output Units | 128 | ![]() | vs | 32 | |
Pixel Rate | 128 GPixel/s | ![]() | vs | 36.8 GPixel/s | |
Comparison |
Max Digital Resolution (WxH) | 4096x2160 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 4096x2160 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGA Connections | 0 | vs | 0 | ||
DVI Connections | 4 | ![]() | vs | 2 | |
HDMI Connections | 2 | ![]() | vs | 1 | |
DisplayPort Connections | - | vs | - | ||
Comparison |
Max Power | 500 Watts | - | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended PSU | 1250 Watts | vs | ![]() | 550 Watts |
DirectX | 12.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 12.0 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shader Model | 5.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 5.0 |
Open GL | 4.4 | vs | ![]() | 4.5 | |
Open CL | - | vs | - | ||
Notebook GPU | no | no | |||
SLI/Crossfire | yes | ![]() | vs | ![]() | yes |
Dedicated | yes | ![]() | vs | ![]() | yes |
Comparison |
Recommended Processor | - | Intel Core i5-4670K 3.4GHz | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended RAM | 12 GB | vs | ![]() | 8 GB | |
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution | 5760x1600 | ![]() | vs | 1920x1080 |
Performance Value | ![]() |
---|
Mini Review | Radeon R9 290X Crossfire is a solution of two Radeon R9 290X put together using AMD'S Crossfire technology. Check the page of Radeon R9 290X to know more about its chip. Crossfire relies a lot on proper driver support and may suffer from micro-stuttering in lower frame rates (below 30). Benchmarks indicate the performance is overall, is up to 30% better than a single Radeon R9 290X performing by itself but at times (depending whether or not the 3D game supports crossfire or in the graphics driver) it may perform worse than a single Radeon R9 290X. Expect this combination to draw up to 500 Watt though the average power consumption should be slightly lower. Even the most demanding games will run at the highest settings. | GeForce GTX 770 Palit JetStream 2GB Edition is a special edition of the high-end GeForce GTX 770. This edition comes with a custom triple fan cooling solution which by itself should allow a slight performance boost, as GeForce GTX 770 benefits from the GPU Boost 2.0 technology. Also, it has been overclocked out of the box from 1046MHz to 1150MHz while its boost clock is now of 1202MHz. The memory clock was left untouched. Benchmarks indicate a 6% performance boost when compared to the reference card and so this edition performs very slightly better than GeForce GTX 590. |
---|
Recommended CPU | - | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Possible GPU Upgrades | - | - | |||
GPU Variants | - | - |