Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game GeForce GT 755M SLI GeForce GTX 765M
Hitman 3 250% 374%
Cyberpunk 2077 169% 265%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 146% 233%
Resident Evil 8 169% 265%
FIFA 21 36% 84%
Grand Theft Auto VI 279% 413%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 138% 223%
Genshin Impact 169% 265%
Far Cry 6 289% 427%
The Medium 236% 355%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce GT 755M SLI are significantly better than the Nvidia GeForce GTX 765M.

The GT 755M has a 130 MHz higher core clock speed and the same number of Texture Mapping Units as the GeForce GTX 765M. This results in the GT 755M providing 8.3 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The GT 755M has a 130 MHz higher core clock speed and 16 more Render Output Units than the GeForce GTX 765M. This results in the GT 755M providing 17.8 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The GT 755M was released less than a year after the GeForce GTX 765M, and so they are likely to have similar driver support for optimizing performance when running the latest games.

The GT 755M has 2048 MB more video memory than the GeForce GTX 765M, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the GT 755M also has superior memory performance overall.

The GT 755M has 108.7 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GeForce GTX 765M, which means that the memory performance of the GT 755M is massively better than the GeForce GTX 765M.

Both the GeForce GT 755M SLI and the GeForce GTX 765M have 768 Shader Processing Units. While the two GPUs have the same number of SPUs, the actual performance delivered by the GT 755M is 753 and by the GeForce GTX 765M is 653. Knowing that the shader performance of the GT 755M is superior, it is not necessary to examine the GPUs' respective Texture and Pixel Fill Rates.

The GeForce GT 755M SLI requires 100 Watts to run and the GeForce GTX 765M requires 65 Watts. The GT 755M requires 35 Watts more than the GeForce GTX 765M to run. The difference is significant enough that the GT 755M may have a slight adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the GeForce GTX 765M.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed980 MHzvs850 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureKepler GK107-GT-755M (x2)Kepler GK106-N14E-GE-B-A1
OC Potential Fair vs Fair
Driver Support Good vs Good
Release Date25 Jun 2013vs30 May 2013
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768
10
green tick vs
8.9
1600x900
8.3
green tick vs
7
1920x1080
6.4
green tick vs
5.5
2560x1440
4.7
green tick vs
3.7
3840x2160
3.1
green tick vs
2.4

GPU Memory

Memory4096 MBvs2048 MB
Memory Speed1350 MHzvs1002 MHz
Memory Bus256 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth172.8GB/secvs64.1GB/sec
L2 Cache 512 KB green tick vs 256 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units768vs768
Actual Shader Performance36%vs31%
Technology28nmvs28nm
Texture Mapping Units64vs64
Texture Rate62.7 GTexel/svs54.4 GTexel/s
Render Output Units32vs16
Pixel Rate31.4 GPixel/svs13.6 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)4096x2160vs4096x2160
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections0vs0
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections0vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power100 Wattsvs65 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX12.0vs12.0
Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.5vs4.5
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes
SLI/Crossfirenovsyes
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i7-4700MQ 4-Core 2.4GHzvsIntel Core i7-3630QM 4-Core 2.4GHz
Recommended RAM8 GBvs8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1920x1080vs1600x900

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
GeForce GT 755M SLI is a solution of two GeForce GT 755M put together using NVIDIA's SLI technology.

Architecture
The Kepler Architecture was NVIDIA's big step to power efficiency. Each Stream Multiprocessor (SMX) now hosts 192 Shader Processing Units - against the 48 of older Fermi Architecture, and has been redesigned being now clocked at the same speed of the Central Unit. This means they are more energy efficient and will consequently lead to cooler operating temperatures. However, it also means they are weaker. It can be said that one Fermi SMX is as fast as 2 Kepler SMXs.
Additionally, and not available in all GPUs, Kepler also introduced the Boost Clock Feature. The Boost Clock is an even higher Clock Speed activated when in gaming mode and becomes the effective speed of the GPU.

Memory
Each GPU accesses a 2GB frame buffer of fast GDDR5, through a 128-bit memory interface. The size of the frame buffer is adequate. The Memory Clock Operates at 1350MHz.

Power Consumption
Power Consumption lies between 75W and 125W.

Performance
Because SLI Relies on Proper Driver Support for Scaling, Performance may vary from game to game.
Overall, GeForce GT 755M SLI should offer Performance Comparable to a single GeForce GTX 770M at 1920x1080.

System Suggestions
GeForce GT 755M SLI is best suited for resolutions up to and including 1920x1080.
Overview
GeForce GTX 760M is a Performance Mobile Graphics Card based on the first revision of the Kepler Architecture.

Architecture
The Kepler Architecture was NVIDIA's big step to power efficiency. Each Stream Multiprocessor (SMX) now hosts 192 Shader Processing Units - against the 48 of older Fermi Architecture, and has been redesigned being now clocked at the same speed of the Central Unit. This means they are more energy efficient and will consequently lead to cooler operating temperatures. However, it also means they are weaker. It can be said that one Fermi SMX is as fast as 2 Kepler SMXs.
Additionally, and not available in all GPUs, Kepler also introduced the Boost Clock Feature. The Boost Clock is an even higher Clock Speed activated when in gaming mode and becomes the effective speed of the GPU.

GPU
It equips a GPU Codenamed GK106-N14E-GE-B-A1 which has 4 Stream Multiprocessors activated and thus offers 768 Shader Processing Units, 64 TMUs and 16 ROPs. The Central Unit is clocked at 850MHz.

Memory
The GPU accesses a 2GB frame buffer of fast GDDR5, through a 128-bit memory interface. The size of the frame buffer is exaggerated and no way benefits the GPU. The Memory Clock Operates at 1002MHz.

Features
DirectX 11.0 Support (11.0 Hardware Default) and support for SLI, Kepler Boost, Optimus, CUDA, OpenCL, DirectCompute, 3D Vision Surround, PhysX, Realtime Raytracing and other technologies

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 65W, it is suited for large laptops.

Performance
Despite being underclocked, when compared to GeForce GTX 650 Ti, GeForce GTX 765M ends up performing better in most cases as fast since the Kepler Boost 2.0 Technology allows an even higher Central Unit Speed, which most times exceeds the 950MHz.
Gaming benchmarks indicate its performance is on average with the desktop GeForce GTX 650 Ti.

System Suggestions
We recommend a Powerful Processor (Intel Core i7 Mobile) and 8GB of RAM for a system with GeForce GTX 765M.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-