Recommended System Requirements | ||
---|---|---|
Game | Radeon R9 280X Crossfire | GeForce GTX 670 Gainward Phantom Edition |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 5% | 64% |
Hitman 3 | 36% | 113% |
Assassins Creed: Valhalla | 4% | 50% |
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War | 7% | 45% |
FIFA 21 | 47% | 17% |
Grand Theft Auto VI | 47% | 131% |
Far Cry 6 | 52% | 137% |
Genshin Impact | 5% | 64% |
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands | 50% | 135% |
Battlefield 6 | 36% | 113% |
In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon R9 280X Crossfire are significantly better than the Nvidia GeForce GTX 670 Gainward Phantom Edition.
The GTX 670 has a 156 MHz higher core clock speed than the R9 280X, but the R9 280X has 144 more Texture Mapping Units than the GTX 670. As a result, the R9 280X exhibits a 104.9 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the GTX 670. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.
The GTX 670 has a 156 MHz higher core clock speed than the R9 280X, but the R9 280X has 32 more Render Output Units than the GTX 670. As a result, the R9 280X exhibits a 22.2 GPixel/s better Pixel Fill Rate than the GTX 670. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.
The R9 280X was released over a year more recently than the GTX 670, and so the R9 280X is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the GTX 670.
Both GPUs exhibit very powerful performance, so it probably isn't worth upgrading from one to the other, as both are capable of running even the most demanding games at the highest settings.
The R9 280X has 4096 MB more video memory than the GTX 670, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the R9 280X also has superior memory performance overall.
The R9 280X has 380.5 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GTX 670, which means that the memory performance of the R9 280X is massively better than the GTX 670.
The Radeon R9 280X Crossfire has 4096 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GTX 670 Gainward Phantom Edition has 1344. However, the actual shader performance of the GTX 670 is 1457. The R9 280X having 2639 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the R9 280X delivers a massively smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the GTX 670.
The Radeon R9 280X Crossfire requires 550 Watts to run but there is no entry for the GeForce GTX 670 Gainward Phantom Edition. We would recommend a PSU with at least 1000 Watts for the R9 280X.
Core Speed | 850 MHz | vs | ![]() | 1006 MHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Boost Clock | 1000 MHz | vs | ![]() | 1084 MHz | |
Architecture | GCN 1.1 Tahiti XTL (x2) | Kepler GK104-325-A2 | |||
OC Potential | Fair |
![]() |
vs | Fair | |
Driver Support | - | vs | Good | ||
Release Date | 01 Oct 2013 | ![]() | vs | 01 May 2012 | |
GPU Link | GD Link | GD Link | |||
Approved | ![]() | ![]() | |||
Comparison |
1366x768 | - | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
- |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1600x900 | - | vs | ![]() |
10
|
|
1920x1080 | 10
|
![]() |
vs | 8.3
|
|
2560x1440 | - | vs | ![]() |
6
|
|
3840x2160 | - | vs | ![]() |
4.4
|
Memory | 6144 MB | ![]() | vs | 2048 MB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Memory Speed | 1500 MHz | vs | ![]() | 1527 MHz | |
Memory Bus | 768 Bit | ![]() | vs | 256 Bit | |
Memory Type | GDDR5 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | GDDR5 |
Memory Bandwidth | 576GB/sec | ![]() | vs | 195.5GB/sec | |
L2 Cache | 1536 KB | ![]() |
vs | 512 KB | |
Delta Color Compression | no | vs | no | ||
Memory Performance | 0% | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
0% |
Comparison |
Shader Processing Units | 4096 | ![]() | vs | 1344 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual Shader Performance | 100% | ![]() | vs | 70% | |
Technology | 28nm | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 28nm |
Texture Mapping Units | 256 | ![]() | vs | 112 | |
Texture Rate | 217.6 GTexel/s | ![]() | vs | 112.7 GTexel/s | |
Render Output Units | 64 | ![]() | vs | 32 | |
Pixel Rate | 54.4 GPixel/s | ![]() | vs | 32.2 GPixel/s | |
Comparison |
Max Digital Resolution (WxH) | 4096x2160 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 4096x2160 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGA Connections | 0 | vs | 0 | ||
DVI Connections | 0 | vs | ![]() | 2 | |
HDMI Connections | 0 | vs | ![]() | 1 | |
DisplayPort Connections | - | vs | - | ||
Comparison |
Max Power | 550 Watts | - | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended PSU | 1000 Watts & 42 Amps | - |
DirectX | 11.2 | vs | ![]() | 12.0 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shader Model | 5.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 5.0 |
Open GL | 4.3 | vs | ![]() | 4.5 | |
Open CL | - | vs | - | ||
Notebook GPU | no | no | |||
SLI/Crossfire | no | vs | ![]() | yes | |
Dedicated | yes | ![]() | vs | ![]() | yes |
Comparison |
Recommended Processor | Intel Core i7-3770K 4-Core 3.5GHz | vs | ![]() | Intel Core i5-3570K 3.4GHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended RAM | 8 GB | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 8 GB |
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution | 1920x1080 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1920x1080 |
Performance Value | ![]() |
---|
Mini Review | Radeon R9 280X Crossfire is a solution of two Radeon R9 280X put together using AMD'S Crossfire technology. Check the page of Radeon R9 280X to know more about its chip. Crossfire relies a lot on proper driver support and may suffer from micro-stuttering in lower frame rates (below 30). Benchmarks indicate the performance is overall, is up to 60% better than a single Radeon R9 280X performing by itself but at times (depending whether or not the 3D game supports crossfire or in the graphics driver) it performed worse than a single Radeon R9 280X. Expect this combination to draw up to 550 Watt though the average power consumption should be slightly lower. Even the most demanding games will run at the highest settings. | GeForce GTX 670 Gainward Phantom Edition is a Special Edition of the powerful GeForce GTX 670. See the standard version for more information about it. The new features include increased overclocking out of the box in the core-clock that went from 915MHz to 1006Hz. The Turbo Boost was also increased to 1084MHz. The performance boost is very significant and benchmarks indicate it's around 6% when compared to the reference GeForce GTX 670. Even the most demanding games will run at the highest settings and with attractive resolutions. |
---|
Recommended CPU | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Possible GPU Upgrades | - | ||||
GPU Variants | - | - |