Recommended System Requirements | ||
---|---|---|
Game | Radeon R9 280X Crossfire | Radeon HD 7970 DirectCU II Edition |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 5% | 64% |
Hitman 3 | 36% | 113% |
Assassins Creed: Valhalla | 4% | 50% |
Resident Evil 8 | 5% | 64% |
FIFA 21 | 47% | 17% |
Grand Theft Auto VI | 47% | 130% |
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War | 7% | 45% |
The Medium | 31% | 104% |
Genshin Impact | 5% | 64% |
Far Cry 6 | 52% | 137% |
In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon R9 280X Crossfire are significantly better than the AMD Radeon HD 7970 DirectCU II Edition.
The HD 7970 has a 75 MHz higher core clock speed than the R9 280X, but the R9 280X has 128 more Texture Mapping Units than the HD 7970. As a result, the R9 280X exhibits a 99.2 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the HD 7970. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.
The HD 7970 has a 75 MHz higher core clock speed than the R9 280X, but the R9 280X has 32 more Render Output Units than the HD 7970. As a result, the R9 280X exhibits a 24.8 GPixel/s better Pixel Fill Rate than the HD 7970. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.
The R9 280X was released over a year more recently than the HD 7970, and so the R9 280X is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the HD 7970.
Both GPUs exhibit very powerful performance, so it probably isn't worth upgrading from one to the other, as both are capable of running even the most demanding games at the highest settings.
The R9 280X has 3072 MB more video memory than the HD 7970, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the R9 280X also has superior memory performance overall.
The R9 280X has 312 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the HD 7970, which means that the memory performance of the R9 280X is massively better than the HD 7970.
The Radeon R9 280X Crossfire has 4096 Shader Processing Units and the Radeon HD 7970 DirectCU II Edition has 2048. However, the actual shader performance of the HD 7970 is 1610. The R9 280X having 2486 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the R9 280X delivers a massively smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the HD 7970.
The Radeon R9 280X Crossfire requires 550 Watts to run but there is no entry for the Radeon HD 7970 DirectCU II Edition. We would recommend a PSU with at least 1000 Watts for the R9 280X.
Core Speed | 850 MHz | vs | ![]() | 925 MHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Boost Clock | 1000 MHz | ![]() | vs | - | |
Architecture | GCN 1.1 Tahiti XTL (x2) | GCN 1.0 Tahiti XT | |||
OC Potential | Fair | vs |
![]() | Good | |
Driver Support | - | vs | Good | ||
Release Date | 01 Oct 2013 | ![]() | vs | 01 Feb 2012 | |
GPU Link | GD Link | GD Link | |||
Approved | ![]() | ![]() | |||
Comparison |
1366x768 | - | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
- |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1600x900 | - | vs | ![]() |
10
|
|
1920x1080 | 10
|
![]() |
vs | 8.3
|
|
2560x1440 | - | vs | ![]() |
6.2
|
|
3840x2160 | - | vs | ![]() |
4.7
|
Memory | 6144 MB | ![]() | vs | 3072 MB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Memory Speed | 1500 MHz | ![]() | vs | 1375 MHz | |
Memory Bus | 768 Bit | ![]() | vs | 384 Bit | |
Memory Type | GDDR5 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | GDDR5 |
Memory Bandwidth | 576GB/sec | ![]() | vs | 264GB/sec | |
L2 Cache | 1536 KB | ![]() |
vs | 768 KB | |
Delta Color Compression | no | vs | no | ||
Memory Performance | 0% | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
0% |
Comparison |
Shader Processing Units | 4096 | ![]() | vs | 2048 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual Shader Performance | 100% | ![]() | vs | 77% | |
Technology | 28nm | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 28nm |
Texture Mapping Units | 256 | ![]() | vs | 128 | |
Texture Rate | 217.6 GTexel/s | ![]() | vs | 118.4 GTexel/s | |
Render Output Units | 64 | ![]() | vs | 32 | |
Pixel Rate | 54.4 GPixel/s | ![]() | vs | 29.6 GPixel/s | |
Comparison |
Max Digital Resolution (WxH) | 4096x2160 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 4096x2160 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGA Connections | 0 | vs | 0 | ||
DVI Connections | 0 | vs | ![]() | 2 | |
HDMI Connections | 0 | vs | 0 | ||
DisplayPort Connections | - | vs | - | ||
Comparison |
Max Power | 550 Watts | - | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended PSU | 1000 Watts & 42 Amps | - |
DirectX | 11.2 | vs | ![]() | 12.0 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shader Model | 5.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 5.0 |
Open GL | 4.3 | vs | ![]() | 4.4 | |
Open CL | - | vs | - | ||
Notebook GPU | no | no | |||
SLI/Crossfire | no | vs | ![]() | yes | |
Dedicated | yes | ![]() | vs | ![]() | yes |
Comparison |
Recommended Processor | Intel Core i7-3770K 4-Core 3.5GHz | vs | ![]() | Intel Core i5-2500K 3.3GHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended RAM | 8 GB | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 8 GB |
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution | 1920x1080 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1920x1080 |
Performance Value | ![]() |
---|
Mini Review | Radeon R9 280X Crossfire is a solution of two Radeon R9 280X put together using AMD'S Crossfire technology. Check the page of Radeon R9 280X to know more about its chip. Crossfire relies a lot on proper driver support and may suffer from micro-stuttering in lower frame rates (below 30). Benchmarks indicate the performance is overall, is up to 60% better than a single Radeon R9 280X performing by itself but at times (depending whether or not the 3D game supports crossfire or in the graphics driver) it performed worse than a single Radeon R9 280X. Expect this combination to draw up to 550 Watt though the average power consumption should be slightly lower. Even the most demanding games will run at the highest settings. | Radeon HD 7970 DirectCU II Edition is a special edition of the Radeon HD 7970 release by AMD. See its page for more information. The only new feature is a new cooling system, called DirectCU II that is 20% cooler and 14dB quieter with exclusive DirectCU II thermal solution, according to Asus. Therefore, the performance is on level with the reference card. Consumers will want to get the TOP version for superior performance. All games, including very demanding ones, should be fully playable at max settings and with very attractive resolutions. |
---|
Recommended CPU | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Possible GPU Upgrades | - | ||||
GPU Variants | - | - |