Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon R9 280X Crossfire GeForce GTX 670 Galaxy GC 4GB Edition
Cyberpunk 2077 5% 64%
Hitman 3 36% 113%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 4% 50%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 7% 45%
FIFA 21 47% 17%
Grand Theft Auto VI 47% 131%
Far Cry 6 52% 137%
Genshin Impact 5% 64%
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands 50% 135%
Battlefield 6 36% 113%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon R9 280X Crossfire are significantly better than the Nvidia GeForce GTX 670 Galaxy GC 4GB Edition.

The GTX 670 has a 156 MHz higher core clock speed than the R9 280X, but the R9 280X has 144 more Texture Mapping Units than the GTX 670. As a result, the R9 280X exhibits a 104.9 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the GTX 670. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The GTX 670 has a 156 MHz higher core clock speed than the R9 280X, but the R9 280X has 32 more Render Output Units than the GTX 670. As a result, the R9 280X exhibits a 22.2 GPixel/s better Pixel Fill Rate than the GTX 670. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The R9 280X was released over a year more recently than the GTX 670, and so the R9 280X is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the GTX 670.

Both GPUs exhibit very powerful performance, so it probably isn't worth upgrading from one to the other, as both are capable of running even the most demanding games at the highest settings.

The R9 280X has 2048 MB more video memory than the GTX 670, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the R9 280X also has superior memory performance overall.

The R9 280X has 383.7 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GTX 670, which means that the memory performance of the R9 280X is massively better than the GTX 670.

The Radeon R9 280X Crossfire has 4096 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GTX 670 Galaxy GC 4GB Edition has 1344. However, the actual shader performance of the GTX 670 is 1458. The R9 280X having 2638 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the R9 280X delivers a massively smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the GTX 670.

The Radeon R9 280X Crossfire requires 550 Watts to run and the GeForce GTX 670 Galaxy GC 4GB Edition requires 170 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 1000 Watts for the R9 280X and a PSU with at least 500 Watts for the GTX 670. The R9 280X requires 380 Watts more than the GTX 670 to run. The difference is significant enough that the R9 280X may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the GTX 670.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed850 MHzvs1006 MHz
Boost Clock1000 MHzvs1085 MHz
ArchitectureGCN 1.1 Tahiti XTL (x2)Kepler GK104-325-A2
OC Potential Fair vs Fair
Driver Support - vs Good
Release Date01 Oct 2013vs01 May 2012
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768 - green tick vs green tick -
1600x900 - vs green tick
10
1920x1080
10
green tick vs
8.3
2560x1440 - vs green tick
6
3840x2160 - vs green tick
4.4

GPU Memory

Memory6144 MBvs4096 MB
Memory Speed1500 MHzvs1502 MHz
Memory Bus768 Bitvs256 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth576GB/secvs192.3GB/sec
L2 Cache 1536 KB green tick vs 512 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units4096vs1344
Actual Shader Performance100%vs70%
Technology28nmvs28nm
Texture Mapping Units256vs112
Texture Rate217.6 GTexel/svs112.7 GTexel/s
Render Output Units64vs32
Pixel Rate54.4 GPixel/svs32.2 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)4096x2160vs4096x2160
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections0vs2
HDMI Connections0vs1
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power550 Wattsvs170 Watts
Recommended PSU1000 Watts & 42 Ampsvs500 Watts & 30 Amps

GPU Features

DirectX11.2vs12.0
Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.3vs4.5
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsyes
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i7-3770K 4-Core 3.5GHzvsIntel Core i5-3570K 3.4GHz
Recommended RAM8 GBvs8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1920x1080vs1920x1080

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewRadeon R9 280X Crossfire is a solution of two Radeon R9 280X put together using AMD'S Crossfire technology.
Check the page of Radeon R9 280X to know more about its chip.
Crossfire relies a lot on proper driver support and may suffer from micro-stuttering in lower frame rates (below 30). Benchmarks indicate the performance is overall, is up to 60% better than a single Radeon R9 280X performing by itself but at times (depending whether or not the 3D game supports crossfire or in the graphics driver) it performed worse than a single Radeon R9 280X. Expect this combination to draw up to 550 Watt though the average power consumption should be slightly lower.
Even the most demanding games will run at the highest settings.
GeForce GTX 670 Galaxy GC 4GB Edition is a Special Edition of the powerful GeForce GTX 670. See the standard version for more information about it.
The new features include an overclocking out of the box in the CC that went from 915MHz to 1006MHz while the Turbo Boost is now of 1085MHz. A new more effective cooler is also included.
On the other hand, the frame buffer was doubled to 4GB. However, this card does not benefit from that much video memory and so that proves useless in a way this card performs like the 2GB GC version.
Benchmarks indicate the performance boost is significant and around 5.5% when compared to the reference GeForce GTX 670.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
GPU Variants
-
-