Recommended System Requirements | ||
---|---|---|
Game | Radeon R7 250X | GeForce GTX 460 PNY 1GB OC Edition |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 335% | 227% |
Hitman 3 | 465% | 325% |
Assassins Creed: Valhalla | 298% | 199% |
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War | 285% | 189% |
FIFA 21 | 119% | 65% |
Grand Theft Auto VI | 512% | 360% |
Far Cry 6 | 529% | 373% |
Genshin Impact | 335% | 227% |
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands | 523% | 369% |
Battlefield 6 | 465% | 325% |
In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 460 PNY 1GB OC Edition are noticeably better than the AMD Radeon R7 250X.
The Radeon R7 250X has a 185 MHz higher core clock speed than the GTX 460, but the GTX 460 has 16 more Texture Mapping Units than the Radeon R7 250X. As a result, the GTX 460 exhibits a 4.8 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the Radeon R7 250X. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.
The Radeon R7 250X has a 185 MHz higher core clock speed than the GTX 460, but the GTX 460 has 16 more Render Output Units than the Radeon R7 250X. As a result, the GTX 460 exhibits a 9.3 GPixel/s better Pixel Fill Rate than the Radeon R7 250X. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.
The Radeon R7 250X was released over three years more recently than the GTX 460, and so the Radeon R7 250X is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the GTX 460 when running the latest games.
The Radeon R7 250X has 1024 MB more video memory than the GTX 460, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. However, the overall memory performance is about the same.
The GTX 460 has 46.4 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the Radeon R7 250X, which means that the memory performance of the GTX 460 is noticeably better than the Radeon R7 250X.
The Radeon R7 250X has 640 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GTX 460 PNY 1GB OC Edition has 336. However, the actual shader performance of the Radeon R7 250X is 517 and the actual shader performance of the GTX 460 is 514. The Radeon R7 250X having 3 better shader performance is not particularly notable, as altogether the GTX 460 performs better when taking into account other relevant data.
The Radeon R7 250X transistor size technology is 12 nm (nanometers) smaller than the GTX 460. This means that the Radeon R7 250X is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the GTX 460.
The Radeon R7 250X requires 80 Watts to run but there is no entry for the GeForce GTX 460 PNY 1GB OC Edition. We would recommend a PSU with at least 450 Watts for the Radeon R7 250X and a PSU with at least 450 Watts for the GTX 460. The two GPUs have been recommended a PSU with the same amount of wattage. As such, there is no need to worry about which will more significantly affect your yearly electricity bills.
Core Speed | 950 MHz | ![]() | vs | 765 MHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Boost Clock | - | vs | - | ||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 Cape Verde XT | Fermi GF104-300-KB-A1 | |||
OC Potential | Fair |
![]() |
vs | Poor | |
Driver Support | Good |
![]() | vs | Poor | |
Release Date | 10 Feb 2014 | ![]() | vs | 01 Aug 2010 | |
GPU Link | GD Link | GD Link | |||
Approved | ![]() | ![]() | |||
Comparison |
1366x768 | 8.8
|
![]() |
vs | - | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1600x900 | 6.6
|
vs | ![]() |
7.5
|
|
1920x1080 | 5.1
|
vs | ![]() |
5.8
|
|
2560x1440 | 3.4
|
vs | ![]() |
3.8
|
|
3840x2160 | 2.2
|
![]() |
vs | - |
Memory | 2048 MB | ![]() | vs | 1024 MB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Memory Speed | 1125 MHz | ![]() | vs | 925 MHz | |
Memory Bus | 128 Bit | vs | ![]() | 256 Bit | |
Memory Type | GDDR5 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | GDDR5 |
Memory Bandwidth | 72GB/sec | vs | ![]() | 118.4GB/sec | |
L2 Cache | 512 KB | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
512 KB |
Delta Color Compression | no | vs | no | ||
Memory Performance | 0% | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
0% |
Comparison |
Shader Processing Units | 640 | ![]() | vs | 336 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual Shader Performance | 25% | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 25% |
Technology | 28nm | ![]() | vs | 40nm | |
Texture Mapping Units | 40 | vs | ![]() | 56 | |
Texture Rate | 38 GTexel/s | vs | ![]() | 42.8 GTexel/s | |
Render Output Units | 16 | vs | ![]() | 32 | |
Pixel Rate | 15.2 GPixel/s | vs | ![]() | 24.5 GPixel/s | |
Comparison |
Max Digital Resolution (WxH) | 4096x2160 | ![]() | vs | 2560x1600 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGA Connections | 0 | vs | 0 | ||
DVI Connections | 1 | vs | ![]() | 2 | |
HDMI Connections | 1 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1 |
DisplayPort Connections | - | vs | - | ||
Comparison |
Max Power | 80 Watts | - | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended PSU | 450 Watts & 20 Amps | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 450 Watts & 38 Amps |
DirectX | 12.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 12.0 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shader Model | 5.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 5.0 |
Open GL | 4.4 | vs | ![]() | 4.5 | |
Open CL | - | vs | - | ||
Notebook GPU | no | no | |||
SLI/Crossfire | yes | ![]() | vs | ![]() | yes |
Dedicated | yes | ![]() | vs | ![]() | yes |
Comparison |
Recommended Processor | Intel Core i3-4130 3.4GHz | ![]() | vs | Intel Core i5-760 2.8GHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended RAM | 8 GB | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 8 GB |
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution | 1600x900 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1600x900 |
Performance Value | ![]() |
---|
Mini Review | Radeon R7 250X is a fast-middle-class Graphics Card based on the Graphics Core Next architecture. It offers the Cape Verde XT GPU. The Cape Verde XT Core is a GCN 1.1 GPU and was first seen on Radeon HD 7770 and then re-used in the OEM only Radeon HD 8760. It offers 640 Shader Processing Units, 40 TMUs and 16 ROPs, on a 128-bits memory interface of fast GDDR5. Radeon R7 250X comes clocked at 950MHz (though there might be some 1GHz versions) and has its operating memory clock set at 1125MHz. The rated TDP board is of 80W and the release price around $99. This card should come in 1GB and 2GB versions, though both will offer the same performance. Its performance has proven to be exactly like Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition (if clocked at 1GHz) and thus this card is not suited for 1080p gaming but it can handle 720p with ease. The 950MHz versions will be around 3% slower. | GeForce GTX 460 PNY 1GB OC Edition is a special edition of the high-end GeForce GTX 460. The biggest features are increases in the core-clock that went from 675MHz to 765MHz and from 900MHz to 925MHz, respectively. According to most benchmarks, the performance boost is around 8% when compared to the standard GeForce GTX 460. |
---|