Recommended System Requirements | ||
---|---|---|
Game | Radeon R7 260X Crossfire | Radeon R9 280X Crossfire |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 66% | 5% |
Assassins Creed: Valhalla | 52% | 4% |
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War | 47% | 7% |
Grand Theft Auto VI | 134% | 47% |
FIFA 21 | 16% | 47% |
Genshin Impact | 66% | 5% |
Far Cry 6 | 140% | 52% |
Hitman 3 | 116% | 36% |
Watch Dogs Legion | 60% | 1% |
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands | 138% | 50% |
In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon R9 280X Crossfire are significantly better than the AMD Radeon R7 260X Crossfire.
The R7 260X has a 250 MHz higher core clock speed than the R9 280X, but the R9 280X has 144 more Texture Mapping Units than the R7 260X. As a result, the R9 280X exhibits a 94.4 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the R7 260X. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.
The R7 260X has a 250 MHz higher core clock speed than the R9 280X, but the R9 280X has 32 more Render Output Units than the R7 260X. As a result, the R9 280X exhibits a 19.2 GPixel/s better Pixel Fill Rate than the R7 260X. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.
Both the Radeon R7 260X Crossfire and the Radeon R9 280X Crossfire were released at the same time, so are likely to be quite similar.
Both GPUs exhibit very powerful performance, so it probably isn't worth upgrading from one to the other, as both are capable of running even the most demanding games at the highest settings.
The R9 280X has 2048 MB more video memory than the R7 260X, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the R9 280X also has superior memory performance overall.
The R9 280X has 368 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the R7 260X, which means that the memory performance of the R9 280X is massively better than the R7 260X.
The Radeon R7 260X Crossfire has 1792 Shader Processing Units and the Radeon R9 280X Crossfire has 4096. However, the actual shader performance of the R7 260X is 1676. The R9 280X having 2420 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the R9 280X delivers a massively smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the R7 260X.
The Radeon R7 260X Crossfire requires 230 Watts to run and the Radeon R9 280X Crossfire requires 550 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 600 Watts for the R7 260X and a PSU with at least 1000 Watts for the R9 280X. The R9 280X requires 320 Watts more than the R7 260X to run. The difference is significant enough that the R9 280X may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the R7 260X.
Core Speed | 1100 MHz | ![]() | vs | 850 MHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Boost Clock | - | vs | ![]() | 1000 MHz | |
Architecture | GCN 1.1 Bonaire XTX (x2) | GCN 1.1 Tahiti XTL (x2) | |||
OC Potential | Fair | vs |
![]() | Fair | |
Driver Support | Great |
![]() | vs | - | |
Release Date | 01 Oct 2013 | vs | 01 Oct 2013 | ||
GPU Link | GD Link | GD Link | |||
Approved | ![]() | ![]() | |||
Comparison |
1366x768 | 10
|
![]() |
vs | - | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1600x900 | 10
|
![]() |
vs | - | |
1920x1080 | 8.3
|
vs | ![]() |
10
|
|
2560x1440 | 6.1
|
![]() |
vs | - | |
3840x2160 | 4.6
|
![]() |
vs | - |
Memory | 4096 MB | vs | ![]() | 6144 MB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Memory Speed | 1625 MHz | ![]() | vs | 1500 MHz | |
Memory Bus | 256 Bit | vs | ![]() | 768 Bit | |
Memory Type | GDDR5 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | GDDR5 |
Memory Bandwidth | 208GB/sec | vs | ![]() | 576GB/sec | |
L2 Cache | 1024 KB | vs | ![]() |
1536 KB | |
Delta Color Compression | no | vs | no | ||
Memory Performance | 0% | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
0% |
Comparison |
Shader Processing Units | 1792 | vs | ![]() | 4096 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual Shader Performance | 81% | vs | ![]() | 100% | |
Technology | 28nm | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 28nm |
Texture Mapping Units | 112 | vs | ![]() | 256 | |
Texture Rate | 123.2 GTexel/s | vs | ![]() | 217.6 GTexel/s | |
Render Output Units | 32 | vs | ![]() | 64 | |
Pixel Rate | 35.2 GPixel/s | vs | ![]() | 54.4 GPixel/s | |
Comparison |
Max Digital Resolution (WxH) | 2560x1600 | vs | ![]() | 4096x2160 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGA Connections | 0 | vs | 0 | ||
DVI Connections | 2 | ![]() | vs | 0 | |
HDMI Connections | 1 | ![]() | vs | 0 | |
DisplayPort Connections | 0 | vs | - | ||
Comparison |
Max Power | 230 Watts | ![]() | vs | 550 Watts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended PSU | 600 Watts & 42 Amps | ![]() | vs | 1000 Watts & 42 Amps |
DirectX | 12.0 | ![]() | vs | 11.2 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shader Model | 5.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 5.0 |
Open GL | 4.4 | ![]() | vs | 4.3 | |
Open CL | - | vs | - | ||
Notebook GPU | no | no | |||
SLI/Crossfire | no | vs | no | ||
Dedicated | yes | ![]() | vs | ![]() | yes |
Comparison |
Recommended Processor | Intel Core i5-4430 3.0GHz | ![]() | vs | Intel Core i7-3770K 4-Core 3.5GHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended RAM | 8 GB | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 8 GB |
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution | 1920x1080 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1920x1080 |
Performance Value | ![]() |
---|
Mini Review | Overview Radeon R7 260X Crossfire is a solution of two Radeon R7 260X put together using AMD's Crossfire Technology. Architecture Each Radeon R7 260X Equips a GPU Codenamed Bonaire XTX which is a Second Gen GCN GPU and is an upgraded version of the Bonaire XT GPU previously used on Radeon 7790. Each Bonaire XT has 14 Compute Units activated and thus offers 896 Shader Processing Units, 56 TMUs and 16 ROPs. GPU The Central Unit of each GPU is clocked at 1100MHz. Memory Each GPU is equipped with fast GDDR5 and Accesses the Frame Buffer through a 128-bit Memory Interface. The Memory Clock Operates at 1625Hz. Memory: Frame Buffer Each GPU can fill up a Memory Pool of up to 2GB. Power Consumption Power Consumption is around 230W. Performance Gaming benchmarks prove that at 1920x1080, the best suited resolution, Radeon R7 260X Crossfire's Performance stands between GeForce GTX 960 and Radeon R9 380. System Suggestions Radeon R7 260X is best suited for resolutions up to and including 1920x1080. We recommend a Performance Processor and 8GB of RAM for Optimal Performance. | Radeon R9 280X Crossfire is a solution of two Radeon R9 280X put together using AMD'S Crossfire technology. Check the page of Radeon R9 280X to know more about its chip. Crossfire relies a lot on proper driver support and may suffer from micro-stuttering in lower frame rates (below 30). Benchmarks indicate the performance is overall, is up to 60% better than a single Radeon R9 280X performing by itself but at times (depending whether or not the 3D game supports crossfire or in the graphics driver) it performed worse than a single Radeon R9 280X. Expect this combination to draw up to 550 Watt though the average power consumption should be slightly lower. Even the most demanding games will run at the highest settings. |
---|
Recommended CPU | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Possible GPU Upgrades | - | - | |||
GPU Variants | - | - |