Recommended System Requirements | ||
---|---|---|
Game | FirePro W9100 | Radeon HD 7850 XFX Ultra OC Edition |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 54% | 154% |
Hitman 3 | 100% | 231% |
Assassins Creed: Valhalla | 41% | 133% |
Resident Evil 8 | 54% | 154% |
FIFA 21 | 22% | 28% |
Grand Theft Auto VI | 116% | 258% |
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War | 36% | 125% |
Genshin Impact | 54% | 154% |
The Medium | 92% | 217% |
Far Cry 6 | 123% | 268% |
In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD FirePro W9100 are significantly better than the AMD Radeon HD 7850 XFX Ultra OC Edition.
The HD 7850 has a 45 MHz higher core clock speed than the FirePro W9100, but the FirePro W9100 has 112 more Texture Mapping Units than the HD 7850. As a result, the FirePro W9100 exhibits a 101.3 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the HD 7850. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.
The HD 7850 has a 45 MHz higher core clock speed than the FirePro W9100, but the FirePro W9100 has 32 more Render Output Units than the HD 7850. As a result, the FirePro W9100 exhibits a 28.3 GPixel/s better Pixel Fill Rate than the HD 7850. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.
The FirePro W9100 was released over a year more recently than the HD 7850, and so the FirePro W9100 is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the HD 7850.
The FirePro W9100 has 15360 MB more video memory than the HD 7850, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the FirePro W9100 also has superior memory performance overall.
The FirePro W9100 has 166.4 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the HD 7850, which means that the memory performance of the FirePro W9100 is massively better than the HD 7850.
The FirePro W9100 has 2816 Shader Processing Units and the Radeon HD 7850 XFX Ultra OC Edition has 1024. However, the actual shader performance of the FirePro W9100 is 2619 and the actual shader performance of the HD 7850 is 849. The FirePro W9100 having 1770 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the FirePro W9100 delivers a massively smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the HD 7850.
The FirePro W9100 requires 290 Watts to run but there is no entry for the Radeon HD 7850 XFX Ultra OC Edition. We would recommend a PSU with at least 750 Watts for the FirePro W9100 and a PSU with at least 500 Watts for the HD 7850. The FirePro W9100 has been recommended a PSU with 250 Watts more than the HD 7850. The difference is significant enough that the FirePro W9100 may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the HD 7850.
Core Speed | 930 MHz | vs | ![]() | 975 MHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Boost Clock | - | vs | - | ||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 Hawaii XT GL | GCN 1.0 Pitcairn PRO | |||
OC Potential | Fair |
![]() |
vs | Fair | |
Driver Support | - | vs | Good | ||
Release Date | 26 Mar 2014 | ![]() | vs | 01 Jun 2012 | |
GPU Link | GD Link | GD Link | |||
Approved | ![]() | ![]() | |||
Comparison |
1366x768 | - | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
- |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1600x900 | - | vs | ![]() |
8.5
|
|
1920x1080 | - | vs | ![]() |
6.6
|
|
2560x1440 | - | vs | ![]() |
4.9
|
|
3840x2160 | - | vs | ![]() |
3.1
|
Memory | 16384 MB | ![]() | vs | 1024 MB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Memory Speed | 1250 MHz | ![]() | vs | 1200 MHz | |
Memory Bus | 512 Bit | ![]() | vs | 256 Bit | |
Memory Type | GDDR5 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | GDDR5 |
Memory Bandwidth | 320GB/sec | ![]() | vs | 153.6GB/sec | |
L2 Cache | 1024 KB | ![]() |
vs | 512 KB | |
Delta Color Compression | no | vs | no | ||
Memory Performance | 0% | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
0% |
Comparison |
Shader Processing Units | 2816 | ![]() | vs | 1024 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual Shader Performance | 100% | ![]() | vs | 41% | |
Technology | 28nm | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 28nm |
Texture Mapping Units | 176 | ![]() | vs | 64 | |
Texture Rate | 163.7 GTexel/s | ![]() | vs | 62.4 GTexel/s | |
Render Output Units | 64 | ![]() | vs | 32 | |
Pixel Rate | 59.5 GPixel/s | ![]() | vs | 31.2 GPixel/s | |
Comparison |
Max Digital Resolution (WxH) | 4096x2160 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 4096x2160 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGA Connections | 0 | vs | 0 | ||
DVI Connections | 0 | vs | ![]() | 2 | |
HDMI Connections | 0 | vs | ![]() | 1 | |
DisplayPort Connections | - | vs | - | ||
Comparison |
Max Power | 290 Watts | - | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended PSU | 750 Watts & 42 Amps | vs | ![]() | 500 Watts |
DirectX | 11.2 | vs | ![]() | 12.0 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shader Model | 5.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 5.0 |
Open GL | 4.4 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 4.4 |
Open CL | - | vs | - | ||
Notebook GPU | no | no | |||
SLI/Crossfire | yes | ![]() | vs | ![]() | yes |
Dedicated | yes | ![]() | vs | ![]() | yes |
Comparison |
Recommended Processor | Intel Core i7-4960X 6-Core 3.60GHz | vs | ![]() | Intel Core i5-3330 3.0GHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended RAM | 12 GB | vs | ![]() | 8 GB | |
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution | 2560x1600 | ![]() | vs | 1920x1080 |
Performance Value | ![]() |
---|
Mini Review | The AMD Firepro W9100 is an enthusiast workstation. The FirePro W9100 comes with a full Hawaii Core with 2816 SPUs, 176 TMUS, and 64 ROPS, on a 512-bit memory interface of fast GDDR5. While the central unit runs at 930MHz, the memory clock operates 1250MHz. The impressive core wrenches over 5 TFLOPS of Single-Precision performance, and 2.67 TFLOPS of Double-Precision performance. The Core stirs from the one used on Radeon R9 290X. Compared to it, its central unit is slightly under clocked but and so its gaming performance is lower than Radeon R9 290X and even more because the latter benefits from certified gaming drivers which unlock the GCN's architecture potential while FirePro W9100 is made for professional applications. Therefore, expect its performance to be between 3% and 7% worse than Radeon R9 290X. | Radeon HD 7850 XFX Ultra OC Edition is a special edition of the powerful Radeon HD 7850. See the standard version for more information about it. The differences include an increase on the core-clock that went from 860MHz to 975MHz. Benchmarks indicate a 7% boost when compared to the standard edition. |
---|
Recommended CPU | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Possible GPU Upgrades | - | ||||
GPU Variants | - | - |