Recommended System Requirements | ||
---|---|---|
Game | Radeon R9 270X Crossfire | GeForce GTX 580 Gigabyte UD rev 1.0 Edition |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 21% | 105% |
Hitman 3 | 58% | 167% |
Assassins Creed: Valhalla | 11% | 88% |
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War | 7% | 82% |
FIFA 21 | 39% | 3% |
Grand Theft Auto VI | 71% | 189% |
Far Cry 6 | 76% | 197% |
Genshin Impact | 21% | 105% |
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands | 74% | 194% |
Battlefield 6 | 58% | 167% |
In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon R9 270X Crossfire are significantly better than the Nvidia GeForce GTX 580 Gigabyte UD rev 1.0 Edition.
The R9 270X has a 205 MHz higher core clock speed and 96 more Texture Mapping Units than the GTX 580. This results in the R9 270X providing 109.1 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.
The R9 270X has a 205 MHz higher core clock speed and 16 more Render Output Units than the GTX 580. This results in the R9 270X providing 25.8 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.
The R9 270X was released over a year more recently than the GTX 580, and so the R9 270X is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the GTX 580.
Both GPUs exhibit very powerful performance, so it probably isn't worth upgrading from one to the other, as both are capable of running even the most demanding games at the highest settings.
The R9 270X has 2560 MB more video memory than the GTX 580, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the R9 270X also has superior memory performance overall.
The R9 270X has 166 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GTX 580, which means that the memory performance of the R9 270X is massively better than the GTX 580.
The Radeon R9 270X Crossfire has 2560 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GTX 580 Gigabyte UD rev 1.0 Edition has 512. However, the actual shader performance of the R9 270X is 2285 and the actual shader performance of the GTX 580 is 814. The R9 270X having 1471 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the R9 270X delivers a massively smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the GTX 580.
The R9 270X transistor size technology is 12 nm (nanometers) smaller than the GTX 580. This means that the R9 270X is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the GTX 580.
The Radeon R9 270X Crossfire requires 360 Watts to run but there is no entry for the GeForce GTX 580 Gigabyte UD rev 1.0 Edition. We would recommend a PSU with at least 750 Watts for the R9 270X and a PSU with at least 600 Watts for the GTX 580. The R9 270X has been recommended a PSU with 150 Watts more than the GTX 580. The difference is significant enough that the R9 270X may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the GTX 580.
Core Speed | 1000 MHz | ![]() | vs | 795 MHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Boost Clock | 1050 MHz | ![]() | vs | - | |
Architecture | GCN 1.1 Curacao XT (x2) | Fermi GF110-375-A1 | |||
OC Potential | Poor |
![]() |
vs |
![]() | Poor |
Driver Support | Great |
![]() | vs | Poor | |
Release Date | 08 Oct 2013 | ![]() | vs | 01 Feb 2011 | |
GPU Link | GD Link | GD Link | |||
Approved | ![]() | ![]() | |||
Comparison |
1366x768 | - | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
- |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1600x900 | - | vs | ![]() |
9.4
|
|
1920x1080 | 9.6
|
![]() |
vs | 7.4
|
|
2560x1440 | - | vs | ![]() |
5.3
|
|
3840x2160 | - | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
- |
Memory | 4096 MB | ![]() | vs | 1536 MB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Memory Speed | 1400 MHz | ![]() | vs | 1002 MHz | |
Memory Bus | 512 Bit | ![]() | vs | 384 Bit | |
Memory Type | GDDR5 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | GDDR5 |
Memory Bandwidth | 358.4GB/sec | ![]() | vs | 192.4GB/sec | |
L2 Cache | 1024 KB | ![]() |
vs | 768 KB | |
Delta Color Compression | no | vs | no | ||
Memory Performance | 0% | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
0% |
Comparison |
Shader Processing Units | 2560 | ![]() | vs | 512 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual Shader Performance | 100% | ![]() | vs | 39% | |
Technology | 28nm | ![]() | vs | 40nm | |
Texture Mapping Units | 160 | ![]() | vs | 64 | |
Texture Rate | 160 GTexel/s | ![]() | vs | 50.9 GTexel/s | |
Render Output Units | 64 | ![]() | vs | 48 | |
Pixel Rate | 64 GPixel/s | ![]() | vs | 38.2 GPixel/s | |
Comparison |
Max Digital Resolution (WxH) | 4096x2160 | ![]() | vs | 2560x1600 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGA Connections | 0 | vs | 0 | ||
DVI Connections | 2 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 2 |
HDMI Connections | 1 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1 |
DisplayPort Connections | - | vs | - | ||
Comparison |
Max Power | 360 Watts | - | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended PSU | 750 Watts | vs | ![]() | 600 Watts |
DirectX | 12.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 12.0 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shader Model | 5.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 5.0 |
Open GL | 4.4 | vs | ![]() | 4.5 | |
Open CL | - | vs | - | ||
Notebook GPU | no | no | |||
SLI/Crossfire | no | vs | ![]() | yes | |
Dedicated | yes | ![]() | vs | ![]() | yes |
Comparison |
Recommended Processor | Intel Core i5-4670K 3.4GHz | vs | ![]() | Intel Core i7-880 Quad 3.06GHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended RAM | 8 GB | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 8 GB |
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution | 1920x1080 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1920x1080 |
Performance Value | ![]() |
---|
Mini Review | Radeon R9 270X Crossfire is a solution of two Radeon R9 270X put together using AMD'S Crossfire technology. Check the page of Radeon R9 270X to know more about its chip. Crossfire relies a lot on proper driver support and may suffer from micro-stuttering in lower frame rates (below 30). Benchmarks indicate the performance is overall, is up to x% better than a single Radeon R9 270X performing by itself but at times (depending whether or not the 3D game supports crossfire or in the graphics driver) it performed worse than a single Radeon R9 270X. Expect this combination to draw up to 360 Watt though the average power consumption should be slightly lower. Even the most demanding games will run at the highest settings. | GeForce GTX 580 Gigabyte UD rev 1.0 Edition is a special edition of the powerful GeForce GTX 580. The differences include an increase in the core-clock that went from 772MHz to 795MHz and a better cooling system called GIGABYTE WINDFORCE 3X with vapor chamber anti-turblence. Benchmarks indicate a performance boost of about 1.5% when compared to the standard GeForce GTX 580. |
---|
Recommended CPU | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Possible GPU Upgrades | - | ||||
GPU Variants | - | - |