Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon R9 270X Crossfire Radeon R9 270 MSI Gaming 2GB Edition
Cyberpunk 2077 21% 111%
Hitman 3 58% 174%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 11% 93%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 7% 87%
FIFA 21 39% 6%
Grand Theft Auto VI 71% 197%
Far Cry 6 76% 205%
Genshin Impact 21% 111%
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands 74% 202%
Battlefield 6 58% 174%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon R9 270X Crossfire are significantly better than the AMD Radeon R9 270 MSI Gaming 2GB Edition.

The R9 270X has a 100 MHz higher core clock speed and 80 more Texture Mapping Units than the R9 270. This results in the R9 270X providing 88 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The R9 270X has a 100 MHz higher core clock speed and 32 more Render Output Units than the R9 270. This results in the R9 270X providing 35.2 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The R9 270 was released less than a year after the R9 270X, and so they are likely to have similar driver support for optimizing performance when running the latest games.

Both GPUs exhibit very powerful performance, so it probably isn't worth upgrading from one to the other, as both are capable of running even the most demanding games at the highest settings.

The R9 270X has 2048 MB more video memory than the R9 270, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the R9 270X also has superior memory performance overall.

The R9 270X has 179.2 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the R9 270, which means that the memory performance of the R9 270X is massively better than the R9 270.

The Radeon R9 270X Crossfire has 2560 Shader Processing Units and the Radeon R9 270 MSI Gaming 2GB Edition has 1280. However, the actual shader performance of the R9 270X is 2285 and the actual shader performance of the R9 270 is 1061. The R9 270X having 1224 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the R9 270X delivers a massively smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the R9 270.

The Radeon R9 270X Crossfire requires 360 Watts to run and the Radeon R9 270 MSI Gaming 2GB Edition requires 175 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 750 Watts for the R9 270X and a PSU with at least 500 Watts for the R9 270. The R9 270X requires 185 Watts more than the R9 270 to run. The difference is significant enough that the R9 270X may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the R9 270.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed1000 MHzvs900 MHz
Boost Clock1050 MHzvs975 MHz
ArchitectureGCN 1.1 Curacao XT (x2)GCN 1.1 Curacao PRO
OC Potential Poor vs Fair
Driver Support Great vs Great
Release Date08 Oct 2013vs13 Nov 2013
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768 - green tick vs green tick -
1600x900 - vs green tick
9.3
1920x1080
9.6
green tick vs
7.3
2560x1440 - vs green tick
5.4
3840x2160 - vs green tick
3.8

GPU Memory

Memory4096 MBvs2048 MB
Memory Speed1400 MHzvs1400 MHz
Memory Bus512 Bitvs256 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth358.4GB/secvs179.2GB/sec
L2 Cache 1024 KB green tick vs 512 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units2560vs1280
Actual Shader Performance100%vs51%
Technology28nmvs28nm
Texture Mapping Units160vs80
Texture Rate160 GTexel/svs72 GTexel/s
Render Output Units64vs32
Pixel Rate64 GPixel/svs28.8 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)4096x2160vs4096x2160
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections2vs2
HDMI Connections1vs1
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power360 Wattsvs175 Watts
Recommended PSU750 Wattsvs500 Watts

GPU Features

DirectX12.0vs12.0
Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.4vs4.4
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsyes
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i5-4670K 3.4GHzvsIntel Core i5-4430 3.0GHz
Recommended RAM8 GBvs8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1920x1080vs1920x1080

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewRadeon R9 270X Crossfire is a solution of two Radeon R9 270X put together using AMD'S Crossfire technology.
Check the page of Radeon R9 270X to know more about its chip.
Crossfire relies a lot on proper driver support and may suffer from micro-stuttering in lower frame rates (below 30). Benchmarks indicate the performance is overall, is up to x% better than a single Radeon R9 270X performing by itself but at times (depending whether or not the 3D game supports crossfire or in the graphics driver) it performed worse than a single Radeon R9 270X. Expect this combination to draw up to 360 Watt though the average power consumption should be slightly lower.
Even the most demanding games will run at the highest settings.
Radeon R9 270 MSI Gaming 2GB Edition is a special edition of the fast-middle-class Radeon R9 270.
This edition comes with a custom cooling system called "TwinFrozr", which reduces the card's temperature under load, significantly and with various modes whereas the gaming mode allows a central unit speed of 975MHz.
Benchmarks indicate a 3% performance boost over the standard edition.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
GPU Variants
-
-