Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game GeForce GTX 750 EVGA Superclocked 1GB Edition Quadro K5000
Cyberpunk 2077 205% 118%
Hitman 3 296% 183%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 179% 99%
Resident Evil 8 205% 118%
FIFA 21 54% 10%
Grand Theft Auto VI 329% 206%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 170% 93%
The Medium 280% 171%
Genshin Impact 205% 118%
Far Cry 6 341% 215%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia Quadro K5000 are significantly better than the Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 EVGA Superclocked 1GB Edition.

The GTX 750 has a 509 MHz higher core clock speed than the Quadro K5000, but the Quadro K5000 has 96 more Texture Mapping Units than the GTX 750. As a result, the Quadro K5000 exhibits a 51.5 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the GTX 750. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The GTX 750 has a 509 MHz higher core clock speed than the Quadro K5000, but the Quadro K5000 has 16 more Render Output Units than the GTX 750. As a result, the Quadro K5000 exhibits a 3.2 GPixel/s better Pixel Fill Rate than the GTX 750. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The GTX 750 was released over a year more recently than the Quadro K5000, and so the GTX 750 is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the Quadro K5000.

The Quadro K5000 has 3072 MB more video memory than the GTX 750, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the Quadro K5000 also has superior memory performance overall.

The Quadro K5000 has 92.6 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GTX 750, which means that the memory performance of the Quadro K5000 is massively better than the GTX 750.

The GeForce GTX 750 EVGA Superclocked 1GB Edition has 512 Shader Processing Units and the Quadro K5000 has 1536. However, the actual shader performance of the GTX 750 is 894 and the actual shader performance of the Quadro K5000 is 1084. The Quadro K5000 having 190 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the Quadro K5000 delivers a massively smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the GTX 750.

The GeForce GTX 750 EVGA Superclocked 1GB Edition requires 55 Watts to run and the Quadro K5000 requires 122 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 300 Watts for the GTX 750 and a PSU with at least 500 Watts for the Quadro K5000. The Quadro K5000 requires 67 Watts more than the GTX 750 to run. The difference is significant enough that the Quadro K5000 may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the GTX 750.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed1215 MHzvs706 MHz
Boost Clock1294 MHzvs-
ArchitectureMaxwell GM107-300-A2Kepler GK104
OC Potential Good vs Fair
Driver Support Great vs Good
Release Date02 Mar 2014vs01 Aug 2012
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768 - green tick vs green tick -
1600x900
7.9
green tick vs -
1920x1080
6.1
green tick vs -
2560x1440
4.3
green tick vs -
3840x2160
2.6
green tick vs -

GPU Memory

Memory1024 MBvs4096 MB
Memory Speed1253 MHzvs1350 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs256 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth80.2GB/secvs172.8GB/sec
L2 Cache 2048 KB green tick vs 512 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units512vs1536
Actual Shader Performance43%vs52%
Technology28nmvs28nm
Texture Mapping Units32vs128
Texture Rate38.9 GTexel/svs90.4 GTexel/s
Render Output Units16vs32
Pixel Rate19.4 GPixel/svs22.6 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)4096x2160vs4096x2160
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections2vs2
HDMI Connections1vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power55 Wattsvs122 Watts
Recommended PSU300 Watts & 20 Ampsvs500 Watts & 33 Amps

GPU Features

DirectX12.0vs12.0
Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.5vs4.5
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsyes
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i3-4130 3.4GHzvsIntel Core i5-2500K 3.3GHz
Recommended RAM8 GBvs8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1600x900vs1920x1080

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewGeForce GTX 750 EVGA Superclocked 1GB Edition is a special edition of the fast-middle-class GeForce GTX 750.
This edition comes with a custom cooling cooling solution which by itself will allow a slight performance boost, as GeForce GTX 750 benefits from the GPU Boost 2.0 technology.
Furthermore, it comes overclocked out of the box in the central unit that was raised from 1020MHz to 1215MHz, while the Turbo Boost is now of 1294MHz, instead of 1085MHz. The operating memory clock was left untouched.
Further overclocking can be achieved easily, as the GPU has great OC potential.
Benchmarks indicate its performance is around 6% better than the reference card.
Quadro K5000 is a high-end professional card based on the 28nm, Kepler architecture.

It's based on the Kepler GK104 GPU and offers 1536 Shader Processing Units, 112 TMUs and 32 ROPs, on a 256-bit memory interface of fast GDDR5. The central unit runs at 706MHz and the memory clock operates at up to 11350MHz. It has a L2 Cache of 512KB and a rated board TDP of 122 Watts.

Despite exhibiting similarities to GeForce GTX 680, due to being under-clocked and because Quadro K5000's drivers are only certified for professional applications only, its gaming performance is similar to GeForce GTX 760.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
GPU Variants
-
-