Recommended System Requirements | ||
---|---|---|
Game | GeForce GTX 750 EVGA Superclocked 1GB Edition | Radeon HD 6770 MSI MD 1GB |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 205% | 406% |
Hitman 3 | 296% | 559% |
Assassins Creed: Valhalla | 179% | 363% |
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War | 170% | 348% |
FIFA 21 | 54% | 155% |
Grand Theft Auto VI | 329% | 612% |
Far Cry 6 | 341% | 633% |
Genshin Impact | 205% | 406% |
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands | 337% | 626% |
Battlefield 6 | 296% | 559% |
In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 EVGA Superclocked 1GB Edition are significantly better than the AMD Radeon HD 6770 MSI MD 1GB.
The GTX 750 has a 415 MHz higher core clock speed but 8 fewer Texture Mapping Units than the HD 6770. The lower TMU count doesn't matter, though, as altogether the GTX 750 manages to provide 6.9 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.
The GTX 750 has a 415 MHz higher core clock speed than the HD 6770 and the same number of Render Output Units. This results in the GTX 750 providing 6.6 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.
The GTX 750 was released over three years more recently than the HD 6770, and so the GTX 750 is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the HD 6770 when running the latest games.
The GeForce GTX 750 EVGA Superclocked 1GB Edition and the Radeon HD 6770 MSI MD 1GB have the same amount of video memory, but are likely to provide slightly different experiences when displaying game textures at high resolutions.
The GTX 750 has 9.8 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the HD 6770, which means that the memory performance of the GTX 750 is marginally better than the HD 6770.
The GeForce GTX 750 EVGA Superclocked 1GB Edition has 512 Shader Processing Units and the Radeon HD 6770 MSI MD 1GB has 800. However, the actual shader performance of the GTX 750 is 894 and the actual shader performance of the HD 6770 is 320. The GTX 750 having 574 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the GTX 750 delivers a noticeably smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the HD 6770.
The GTX 750 transistor size technology is 12 nm (nanometers) smaller than the HD 6770. This means that the GTX 750 is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the HD 6770.
The GeForce GTX 750 EVGA Superclocked 1GB Edition requires 55 Watts to run but there is no entry for the Radeon HD 6770 MSI MD 1GB. We would recommend a PSU with at least 300 Watts for the GTX 750.
Core Speed | 1215 MHz | ![]() | vs | 800 MHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Boost Clock | 1294 MHz | ![]() | vs | - | |
Architecture | Maxwell GM107-300-A2 | Terascale 2 Juniper XT | |||
OC Potential | Good |
![]() |
vs | Fair | |
Driver Support | Great |
![]() | vs | Poor | |
Release Date | 02 Mar 2014 | ![]() | vs | 01 Oct 2010 | |
GPU Link | GD Link | GD Link | |||
Approved | ![]() | ![]() | |||
Comparison |
1366x768 | - | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
- |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1600x900 | 7.9
|
![]() |
vs | 5.8
|
|
1920x1080 | 6.1
|
![]() |
vs | 4.7
|
|
2560x1440 | 4.3
|
![]() |
vs | 2.9
|
|
3840x2160 | 2.6
|
![]() |
vs | - |
Memory | 1024 MB | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1024 MB |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Memory Speed | 1253 MHz | ![]() | vs | 1100 MHz | |
Memory Bus | 128 Bit | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 128 Bit |
Memory Type | GDDR5 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | GDDR5 |
Memory Bandwidth | 80.2GB/sec | ![]() | vs | 70.4GB/sec | |
L2 Cache | 2048 KB | ![]() |
vs | 256 KB | |
Delta Color Compression | no | vs | no | ||
Memory Performance | 0% | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
0% |
Comparison |
Shader Processing Units | 512 | vs | ![]() | 800 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual Shader Performance | 43% | ![]() | vs | 15% | |
Technology | 28nm | ![]() | vs | 40nm | |
Texture Mapping Units | 32 | vs | ![]() | 40 | |
Texture Rate | 38.9 GTexel/s | ![]() | vs | 32 GTexel/s | |
Render Output Units | 16 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 16 |
Pixel Rate | 19.4 GPixel/s | ![]() | vs | 12.8 GPixel/s | |
Comparison |
Max Digital Resolution (WxH) | 4096x2160 | ![]() | vs | 2560x1600 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGA Connections | 0 | vs | ![]() | 1 | |
DVI Connections | 2 | ![]() | vs | 1 | |
HDMI Connections | 1 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1 |
DisplayPort Connections | - | vs | - | ||
Comparison |
Max Power | 55 Watts | - | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended PSU | 300 Watts & 20 Amps | - |
DirectX | 12.0 | ![]() | vs | 11.0 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shader Model | 5.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 5.0 |
Open GL | 4.5 | ![]() | vs | 4.3 | |
Open CL | - | vs | - | ||
Notebook GPU | no | no | |||
SLI/Crossfire | no | vs | ![]() | yes | |
Dedicated | yes | ![]() | vs | ![]() | yes |
Comparison |
Recommended Processor | Intel Core i3-4130 3.4GHz | vs | ![]() | Intel Core i3-2100 3.1GHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended RAM | 8 GB | vs | ![]() | 6 GB | |
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution | 1600x900 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1600x900 |
Performance Value | ![]() |
---|
Mini Review | GeForce GTX 750 EVGA Superclocked 1GB Edition is a special edition of the fast-middle-class GeForce GTX 750. This edition comes with a custom cooling cooling solution which by itself will allow a slight performance boost, as GeForce GTX 750 benefits from the GPU Boost 2.0 technology. Furthermore, it comes overclocked out of the box in the central unit that was raised from 1020MHz to 1215MHz, while the Turbo Boost is now of 1294MHz, instead of 1085MHz. The operating memory clock was left untouched. Further overclocking can be achieved easily, as the GPU has great OC potential. Benchmarks indicate its performance is around 6% better than the reference card. | Radeon HD 6770 MSI MD 1GB is a special edition of Radeon HD 6770. Compared to standard Radeon HD 6770 the performance is worse because both the core and memory clocks were reduced from 850MHz to 800MHz and from 1200MHz to 1100MHz, respectively. There are no benchmarks available but we predict the performance is around 5% worse when compared to the standard AMD edition. The power consumption should also be lower. |
---|
Recommended CPU | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Possible GPU Upgrades | |||||
GPU Variants | - | - |