Recommended System Requirements | ||
---|---|---|
Game | GeForce GTX 750 EVGA Superclocked 1GB Edition | Radeon HD 5770 512MB |
Hitman 3 | 296% | 539% |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 205% | 391% |
Assassins Creed: Valhalla | 179% | 349% |
Resident Evil 8 | 205% | 391% |
FIFA 21 | 54% | 148% |
Grand Theft Auto VI | 329% | 591% |
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War | 170% | 335% |
Genshin Impact | 205% | 391% |
Far Cry 6 | 341% | 611% |
The Medium | 280% | 513% |
In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 EVGA Superclocked 1GB Edition are significantly better than the AMD Radeon HD 5770 512MB.
The GTX 750 has a 365 MHz higher core clock speed but 8 fewer Texture Mapping Units than the HD 5770. The lower TMU count doesn't matter, though, as altogether the GTX 750 manages to provide 4.9 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.
The GTX 750 has a 365 MHz higher core clock speed than the HD 5770 and the same number of Render Output Units. This results in the GTX 750 providing 5.8 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.
The GTX 750 was released over three years more recently than the HD 5770, and so the GTX 750 is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the HD 5770 when running the latest games.
The GTX 750 has 512 MB more video memory than the HD 5770, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the GTX 750 also has superior memory performance overall.
The GTX 750 has 3.4 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the HD 5770, which means that the memory performance of the GTX 750 is marginally better than the HD 5770.
The GeForce GTX 750 EVGA Superclocked 1GB Edition has 512 Shader Processing Units and the Radeon HD 5770 512MB has 800. However, the actual shader performance of the GTX 750 is 894 and the actual shader performance of the HD 5770 is 340. The GTX 750 having 554 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the GTX 750 delivers a noticeably smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the HD 5770.
The GTX 750 transistor size technology is 12 nm (nanometers) smaller than the HD 5770. This means that the GTX 750 is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the HD 5770.
The GeForce GTX 750 EVGA Superclocked 1GB Edition requires 55 Watts to run and the Radeon HD 5770 512MB requires 108 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 300 Watts for the GTX 750 and a PSU with at least 450 Watts for the HD 5770. The HD 5770 requires 53 Watts more than the GTX 750 to run. The difference is significant enough that the HD 5770 may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the GTX 750.
Core Speed | 1215 MHz | ![]() | vs | 850 MHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Boost Clock | 1294 MHz | ![]() | vs | - | |
Architecture | Maxwell GM107-300-A2 | Terascale 2 Juniper XT | |||
OC Potential | Good |
![]() |
vs | Fair | |
Driver Support | Great |
![]() | vs | Poor | |
Release Date | 02 Mar 2014 | ![]() | vs | 01 Oct 2009 | |
GPU Link | GD Link | GD Link | |||
Approved | ![]() | ![]() | |||
Comparison |
1366x768 | - | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
- |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1600x900 | 7.9
|
![]() |
vs | 5.9
|
|
1920x1080 | 6.1
|
![]() |
vs | 4.8
|
|
2560x1440 | 4.3
|
![]() |
vs | 2.8
|
|
3840x2160 | 2.6
|
![]() |
vs | - |
Memory | 1024 MB | ![]() | vs | 512 MB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Memory Speed | 1253 MHz | ![]() | vs | 1200 MHz | |
Memory Bus | 128 Bit | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 128 Bit |
Memory Type | GDDR5 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | GDDR5 |
Memory Bandwidth | 80.2GB/sec | ![]() | vs | 76.8GB/sec | |
L2 Cache | 2048 KB | ![]() |
vs | 256 KB | |
Delta Color Compression | no | vs | no | ||
Memory Performance | 0% | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
0% |
Comparison |
Shader Processing Units | 512 | vs | ![]() | 800 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual Shader Performance | 43% | ![]() | vs | 16% | |
Technology | 28nm | ![]() | vs | 40nm | |
Texture Mapping Units | 32 | vs | ![]() | 40 | |
Texture Rate | 38.9 GTexel/s | ![]() | vs | 34 GTexel/s | |
Render Output Units | 16 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 16 |
Pixel Rate | 19.4 GPixel/s | ![]() | vs | 13.6 GPixel/s | |
Comparison |
Max Digital Resolution (WxH) | 4096x2160 | ![]() | vs | 2560x1600 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGA Connections | 0 | vs | 0 | ||
DVI Connections | 2 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 2 |
HDMI Connections | 1 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1 |
DisplayPort Connections | - | vs | - | ||
Comparison |
Max Power | 55 Watts | ![]() | vs | 108 Watts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended PSU | 300 Watts & 20 Amps | ![]() | vs | 450 Watts & 34 Amps |
DirectX | 12.0 | ![]() | vs | 11.0 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shader Model | 5.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 5.0 |
Open GL | 4.5 | ![]() | vs | 4.3 | |
Open CL | - | vs | - | ||
Notebook GPU | no | no | |||
SLI/Crossfire | no | vs | ![]() | yes | |
Dedicated | yes | ![]() | vs | ![]() | yes |
Comparison |
Recommended Processor | Intel Core i3-4130 3.4GHz | vs | ![]() | Intel Pentium Dual Core E6700 3.2GHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended RAM | 8 GB | vs | ![]() | 6 GB | |
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution | 1600x900 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1600x900 |
Performance Value | ![]() |
---|
Mini Review | GeForce GTX 750 EVGA Superclocked 1GB Edition is a special edition of the fast-middle-class GeForce GTX 750. This edition comes with a custom cooling cooling solution which by itself will allow a slight performance boost, as GeForce GTX 750 benefits from the GPU Boost 2.0 technology. Furthermore, it comes overclocked out of the box in the central unit that was raised from 1020MHz to 1215MHz, while the Turbo Boost is now of 1294MHz, instead of 1085MHz. The operating memory clock was left untouched. Further overclocking can be achieved easily, as the GPU has great OC potential. Benchmarks indicate its performance is around 6% better than the reference card. | The Evergreen series is a family of GPUs developed by AMD graphics products division. The existence was spotted on a presentation slide from AMD Technology Analyst Day July 2007 as 'R8xx'. ATI held a press event in the USS Hornet museum on September 10, 2009 and announced ATI Eyefinity multi-display technology and specifications of the Radeon HD 5800 series' variants. The first variants of the Radeon HD 5800 series were launched September 23, 2009, with the HD 5700 series launching October 12 and HD 5970 launching on November 18 The HD 5670, was launched on January 14, 2010, and the HD 5500 and 5400 series were launched in February of 2010, completing what has appeared to be most of ATI's Evergreen GPU lineup. Demand so greatly outweighed supply that more than two months after launch, many online retailers were still having trouble keeping the 5800 and 5900 series in stock. |
---|
Recommended CPU | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Possible GPU Upgrades | |||||
GPU Variants | - | - |