Recommended System Requirements | ||
---|---|---|
Game | FirePro D700 | Radeon R9 270X Crossfire |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 111% | 21% |
Assassins Creed: Valhalla | 93% | 11% |
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War | 87% | 7% |
Grand Theft Auto VI | 197% | 71% |
FIFA 21 | 7% | 39% |
Genshin Impact | 111% | 21% |
Far Cry 6 | 206% | 76% |
Hitman 3 | 175% | 58% |
Watch Dogs Legion | 104% | 17% |
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands | 203% | 74% |
In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon R9 270X Crossfire are significantly better than the AMD FirePro D700.
The R9 270X has a 150 MHz higher core clock speed and 32 more Texture Mapping Units than the FirePro D700. This results in the R9 270X providing 51.2 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.
The R9 270X has a 150 MHz higher core clock speed and 32 more Render Output Units than the FirePro D700. This results in the R9 270X providing 36.8 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.
The FirePro D700 was released less than a year after the R9 270X, and so they are likely to have similar driver support for optimizing performance when running the latest games.
Both GPUs exhibit very powerful performance, so it probably isn't worth upgrading from one to the other, as both are capable of running even the most demanding games at the highest settings.
The R9 270X has 1024 MB more video memory than the FirePro D700, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the R9 270X also has superior memory performance overall.
The R9 270X has 94.4 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the FirePro D700, which means that the memory performance of the R9 270X is massively better than the FirePro D700.
The FirePro D700 has 2048 Shader Processing Units and the Radeon R9 270X Crossfire has 2560. However, the actual shader performance of the FirePro D700 is 1132 and the actual shader performance of the R9 270X is 2285. The R9 270X having 1153 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the R9 270X delivers a massively smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the FirePro D700.
The FirePro D700 requires 274 Watts to run and the Radeon R9 270X Crossfire requires 360 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 500 Watts for the FirePro D700 and a PSU with at least 750 Watts for the R9 270X. The R9 270X requires 86 Watts more than the FirePro D700 to run. The difference is significant enough that the R9 270X may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the FirePro D700.
Core Speed | 850 MHz | vs | ![]() | 1000 MHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Boost Clock | - | vs | ![]() | 1050 MHz | |
Architecture | Tahiti XT GL | GCN 1.1 Curacao XT (x2) | |||
OC Potential | Fair |
![]() |
vs | Poor | |
Driver Support | - | vs | Great | ||
Release Date | 18 Jan 2014 | ![]() | vs | 08 Oct 2013 | |
GPU Link | GD Link | GD Link | |||
Approved | ![]() | ![]() | |||
Comparison |
1366x768 | - | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
- |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1600x900 | - | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
- |
1920x1080 | - | vs | ![]() |
9.6
|
|
2560x1440 | - | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
- |
3840x2160 | - | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
- |
Memory | 3072 MB | vs | ![]() | 4096 MB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Memory Speed | 1375 MHz | vs | ![]() | 1400 MHz | |
Memory Bus | 384 Bit | vs | ![]() | 512 Bit | |
Memory Type | GDDR5 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | GDDR5 |
Memory Bandwidth | 264GB/sec | vs | ![]() | 358.4GB/sec | |
L2 Cache | - | vs | ![]() |
1024 KB | |
Delta Color Compression | no | vs | no | ||
Memory Performance | 0% | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
0% |
Comparison |
Shader Processing Units | 2048 | vs | ![]() | 2560 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual Shader Performance | 54% | vs | ![]() | 100% | |
Technology | 28nm | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 28nm |
Texture Mapping Units | 128 | vs | ![]() | 160 | |
Texture Rate | 108.8 GTexel/s | vs | ![]() | 160 GTexel/s | |
Render Output Units | 32 | vs | ![]() | 64 | |
Pixel Rate | 27.2 GPixel/s | vs | ![]() | 64 GPixel/s | |
Comparison |
Max Digital Resolution (WxH) | 4096x2160 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 4096x2160 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGA Connections | 0 | vs | 0 | ||
DVI Connections | 0 | vs | ![]() | 2 | |
HDMI Connections | 0 | vs | ![]() | 1 | |
DisplayPort Connections | - | vs | - | ||
Comparison |
Max Power | 274 Watts | ![]() | vs | 360 Watts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended PSU | 500 Watts & 40 Amps | ![]() | vs | 750 Watts |
DirectX | 11.2 | vs | ![]() | 12.0 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shader Model | 5.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 5.0 |
Open GL | 4.3 | vs | ![]() | 4.4 | |
Open CL | - | vs | - | ||
Notebook GPU | no | no | |||
SLI/Crossfire | yes | ![]() | vs | no | |
Dedicated | yes | ![]() | vs | ![]() | yes |
Comparison |
Recommended Processor | Intel Core i5-4670K 3.4GHz | vs | Intel Core i5-4670K 3.4GHz | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended RAM | 8 GB | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 8 GB |
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution | 1920x1080 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1920x1080 |
Performance Value | ![]() |
---|
Mini Review | FirePro D700 is a workstation Graphics Card based on the 28nm GCN architecture. It's based on the Tahiti XT GL (same used on Radeon HD 7970) and therefore offers 2048 Shader Processing Units, 128 TMUs and 32 ROPs, but on a 384-bit interface of fast GDDR5. The central unit is clocked 850MHz while the memory clock operates at 1375MHZ. It is thus considerably lower clocked and its gaming performance is even lower, as Radeon HD 7970 benefits from certified gaming drivers which unlock the GCN's architecture potential while FirePro D700 is made for professional applications. Therefore, expect its performance to be similar to Radeon HD 7950 Boost Edition. | Radeon R9 270X Crossfire is a solution of two Radeon R9 270X put together using AMD'S Crossfire technology. Check the page of Radeon R9 270X to know more about its chip. Crossfire relies a lot on proper driver support and may suffer from micro-stuttering in lower frame rates (below 30). Benchmarks indicate the performance is overall, is up to x% better than a single Radeon R9 270X performing by itself but at times (depending whether or not the 3D game supports crossfire or in the graphics driver) it performed worse than a single Radeon R9 270X. Expect this combination to draw up to 360 Watt though the average power consumption should be slightly lower. Even the most demanding games will run at the highest settings. |
---|
Recommended CPU | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Possible GPU Upgrades | - | - | |||
GPU Variants | - | - |