Recommended System Requirements | ||
---|---|---|
Game | Intel HD Graphics Desktop (Haswell) | GeForce 8600 GT 512MB GDDR3 |
Hitman 3 | 3279% | 2000% |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 2498% | 1514% |
Assassins Creed: Valhalla | 2276% | 1376% |
Resident Evil 8 | 2498% | 1514% |
FIFA 21 | 1210% | 714% |
Grand Theft Auto VI | 3555% | 2171% |
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War | 2199% | 1329% |
Genshin Impact | 2498% | 1514% |
Far Cry 6 | 3659% | 2236% |
The Medium | 3141% | 1914% |
In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce 8600 GT 512MB GDDR3 are significantly better than the Intel HD Graphics Desktop (Haswell).
The Graphics Desktop has a 110 MHz higher core clock speed than the 8600 GT, but the 8600 GT has 12 more Texture Mapping Units than the Graphics Desktop. As a result, the 8600 GT exhibits a 6 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the Graphics Desktop. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.
The Graphics Desktop has a 110 MHz higher core clock speed than the 8600 GT, but the 8600 GT has 6 more Render Output Units than the Graphics Desktop. As a result, the 8600 GT exhibits a 3 GPixel/s better Pixel Fill Rate than the Graphics Desktop. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.
The Graphics Desktop was released over three years more recently than the 8600 GT, and so the Graphics Desktop is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the 8600 GT when running the latest games.
The 8600 GT has 512 MB video memory, but the Graphics Desktop does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.
The HD Graphics Desktop (Haswell) has 10 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce 8600 GT 512MB GDDR3 has 32. However, the actual shader performance of the Graphics Desktop is 61 and the actual shader performance of the 8600 GT is 43. The Graphics Desktop having 18 better shader performance is not particularly notable, as altogether the 8600 GT performs better when taking into account other relevant data.
The Graphics Desktop transistor size technology is 58 nm (nanometers) smaller than the 8600 GT. This means that the Graphics Desktop is expected to run massively cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the 8600 GT.
The HD Graphics Desktop (Haswell) requires 4 Watts to run and the GeForce 8600 GT 512MB GDDR3 requires 46 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 350 Watts for the 8600 GT, but we do not have a recommended PSU wattage for the Graphics Desktop. The 8600 GT requires 42 Watts more than the Graphics Desktop to run. The difference is significant enough that the 8600 GT may have a slight adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the Graphics Desktop.
Core Speed | 650 MHz | ![]() | vs | 540 MHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Boost Clock | 1250 MHz | ![]() | vs | - | |
Architecture | Haswell | Tesla G84 | |||
OC Potential | None | vs |
![]() | Poor | |
Driver Support | - | vs | Poor | ||
Release Date | 01 Jun 2013 | ![]() | vs | 01 Apr 2007 | |
GPU Link | GD Link | GD Link | |||
Approved | ![]() | ![]() | |||
Comparison |
1366x768 | - | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
- |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1600x900 | - | vs | ![]() |
3.1
|
|
1920x1080 | - | vs | ![]() |
2.2
|
|
2560x1440 | - | vs | ![]() |
1.4
|
|
3840x2160 | - | vs | ![]() |
0.9
|
Memory | N/A | vs | ![]() | 512 MB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Memory Speed | 800 MHz | ![]() | vs | 700 MHz | |
Memory Bus | 128 Bit | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 128 Bit |
Memory Type | DDR3 | vs | ![]() | GDDR3 | |
Memory Bandwidth | 25.6GB/sec | ![]() | vs | 22.4GB/sec | |
L2 Cache | - | vs | ![]() |
0 KB | |
Delta Color Compression | no | vs | no | ||
Memory Performance | 0% | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
0% |
Comparison |
Shader Processing Units | 10 | vs | ![]() | 32 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual Shader Performance | 3% | ![]() | vs | 2% | |
Technology | 22nm | ![]() | vs | 80nm | |
Texture Mapping Units | 4 | vs | ![]() | 16 | |
Texture Rate | 2.6 GTexel/s | vs | ![]() | 8.6 GTexel/s | |
Render Output Units | 2 | vs | ![]() | 8 | |
Pixel Rate | 1.3 GPixel/s | vs | ![]() | 4.3 GPixel/s | |
Comparison |
Max Digital Resolution (WxH) | 2560x1600 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 2560x1600 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGA Connections | 0 | vs | ![]() | 1 | |
DVI Connections | 0 | vs | ![]() | 1 | |
HDMI Connections | 0 | vs | ![]() | 1 | |
DisplayPort Connections | - | vs | - | ||
Comparison |
Max Power | 4 Watts | ![]() | vs | 46 Watts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended PSU | - | 350 Watts & 24 Amps |
DirectX | 11.1 | ![]() | vs | 10.0 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shader Model | 5.0 | ![]() | vs | 4.0 | |
Open GL | 4.0 | ![]() | vs | 3.3 | |
Open CL | - | vs | - | ||
Notebook GPU | no | no | |||
SLI/Crossfire | no | vs | ![]() | yes | |
Dedicated | no | vs | ![]() | yes | |
Comparison |
Recommended Processor | - | Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 2.4GHz | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended RAM | 4 GB | vs | ![]() | 3 GB | |
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution | 1366x768 | ![]() | vs | 1024x768 |
Performance Value | ![]() |
---|
Mini Review | Intel HD Graphics Desktop (Haswell) are integrated graphics in the budget Celeron and Pentium Haswell Desktop processors. Their performance depends on the processor they are integrated on, as the latter defines the Base and Boost Clock, as well as on the SYSTEM RAM, which defines the operating memory clock, and whether the GPU accesses a 64-bit or 128-bit memory interface. Best case scenario, the Intel HD Graphics Desktop (Haswell) perform slightly above Intel HD 3000 Graphics and so most modern demanding games will have to be played with the lowest settings, while some aren't even playable. | GeForce 8600 GT 512MB GDDR3 is one of the many variants of the fast-middle-class GeForce 8600 GT. On this version, the GPU is equipped with 512MB of standard GDDR3. The architecture allows the use of 512MB, since the GPU's processing power is strong enough and the memory controller is up for the task of processing 512MB. Therefore, the performance is superior to the 256MB version and any other version of DDR2, including 1GB. However, and due to its architecture limitations, modern demanding games will require reduced settings, even if they don't require more than 512MB of video ram. Very Demanding games like Metro 2033 are only playable at the lowest settings. |
---|
Recommended CPU | - | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Possible GPU Upgrades | N/A | N/A | |||
GPU Variants | - | - |