Recommended System Requirements | ||
---|---|---|
Game | GeForce GTX 780 EVGA SC w/ ACX Edition SLI | GeForce GTX 680 Galaxy Edition |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 16% | 46% |
Hitman 3 | 10% | 90% |
Assassins Creed: Valhalla | 23% | 34% |
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War | 25% | 29% |
FIFA 21 | 58% | 26% |
Grand Theft Auto VI | 18% | 105% |
Far Cry 6 | 22% | 111% |
Genshin Impact | 16% | 46% |
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands | 21% | 109% |
Battlefield 6 | 10% | 90% |
In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 EVGA SC w/ ACX Edition SLI are significantly better than the Nvidia GeForce GTX 680 Galaxy Edition.
The GTX 680 has a 143 MHz higher core clock speed than the GTX 780, but the GTX 780 has 256 more Texture Mapping Units than the GTX 680. As a result, the GTX 780 exhibits a 229.2 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the GTX 680. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.
The GTX 680 has a 143 MHz higher core clock speed than the GTX 780, but the GTX 780 has 64 more Render Output Units than the GTX 680. As a result, the GTX 780 exhibits a 57.3 GPixel/s better Pixel Fill Rate than the GTX 680. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.
The GTX 780 was released over a year more recently than the GTX 680, and so the GTX 780 is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the GTX 680.
Both GPUs exhibit very powerful performance, so it probably isn't worth upgrading from one to the other, as both are capable of running even the most demanding games at the highest settings.
The GTX 780 has 2048 MB more video memory than the GTX 680, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the GTX 780 also has superior memory performance overall.
The GTX 780 has 384.5 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GTX 680, which means that the memory performance of the GTX 780 is massively better than the GTX 680.
The GeForce GTX 780 EVGA SC w/ ACX Edition SLI has 4608 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GTX 680 Galaxy Edition has 1536. However, the actual shader performance of the GTX 780 is 4700 and the actual shader performance of the GTX 680 is 1806. The GTX 780 having 2894 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the GTX 780 delivers a massively smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the GTX 680.
The GeForce GTX 780 EVGA SC w/ ACX Edition SLI requires 500 Watts to run and the GeForce GTX 680 Galaxy Edition requires 195 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 750 Watts for the GTX 780 and a PSU with at least 550 Watts for the GTX 680. The GTX 780 requires 305 Watts more than the GTX 680 to run. The difference is significant enough that the GTX 780 may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the GTX 680.
Core Speed | 967 MHz | vs | ![]() | 1110 MHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Boost Clock | 1020 MHz | vs | ![]() | 1176 MHz | |
Architecture | Kepler GK110 | Kepler GK104-400-A2 | |||
OC Potential | Poor | vs |
![]() | Good | |
Driver Support | Good | vs | Good | ||
Release Date | 23 May 2013 | ![]() | vs | 01 May 2012 | |
GPU Link | GD Link | GD Link | |||
Approved | ![]() | ![]() | |||
Comparison |
1366x768 | 10
|
![]() |
vs | - | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1600x900 | 10
|
![]() |
vs | ![]() |
10
|
1920x1080 | 10
|
![]() |
vs | 8.8
|
|
2560x1440 | 9.2
|
![]() |
vs | 6.4
|
|
3840x2160 | 6.9
|
![]() |
vs | 4.7
|
Memory | 6144 MB | ![]() | vs | 4096 MB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Memory Speed | 1502 MHz | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1502 MHz |
Memory Bus | 768 Bit | ![]() | vs | 256 Bit | |
Memory Type | GDDR5 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | GDDR5 |
Memory Bandwidth | 576.8GB/sec | ![]() | vs | 192.3GB/sec | |
L2 Cache | 1536 KB | ![]() |
vs | 512 KB | |
Delta Color Compression | no | vs | no | ||
Memory Performance | 0% | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
0% |
Comparison |
Shader Processing Units | 4608 | ![]() | vs | 1536 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual Shader Performance | 100% | ![]() | vs | 87% | |
Technology | 28nm | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 28nm |
Texture Mapping Units | 384 | ![]() | vs | 128 | |
Texture Rate | 371.3 GTexel/s | ![]() | vs | 142.1 GTexel/s | |
Render Output Units | 96 | ![]() | vs | 32 | |
Pixel Rate | 92.8 GPixel/s | ![]() | vs | 35.5 GPixel/s | |
Comparison |
Max Digital Resolution (WxH) | 4096x2160 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 4096x2160 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGA Connections | 0 | vs | 0 | ||
DVI Connections | 2 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 2 |
HDMI Connections | 1 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1 |
DisplayPort Connections | - | vs | - | ||
Comparison |
Max Power | 500 Watts | vs | ![]() | 195 Watts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended PSU | 750 Watts & 42 Amps | vs | ![]() | 550 Watts & 42 Amps |
DirectX | 12.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 12.0 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shader Model | 5.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 5.0 |
Open GL | 4.5 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 4.5 |
Open CL | - | vs | - | ||
Notebook GPU | no | no | |||
SLI/Crossfire | no | vs | ![]() | yes | |
Dedicated | yes | ![]() | vs | ![]() | yes |
Comparison |
Recommended Processor | Intel Core i7-4770K 4-Core 3.5GHz | vs | ![]() | Intel Core i7-3770K 4-Core 3.5GHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended RAM | 12 GB | vs | ![]() | 8 GB | |
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution | 2560x1600 | ![]() | vs | 1920x1080 |
Performance Value | ![]() |
---|
Mini Review | GeForce GTX 780 EVGA SC w/ ACX Edition SLI is a solution of two GeForce GTX 780 EVGA SC w/ ACX Edition. | GeForce GTX 680 Galaxy Edition is a Special Edition of the powerful GeForce GTX 680. See the standard version for more information about it. Compared to the standard version, GeForce GTX 680 Galaxy Edition features an increased core-clock that went from 1006MHz to 1110MHz and the turbo boost from 1100MHz to 1176MHz. The amount of memory was also increased from 2GB to 4GB, proving useful if gaming at high resolutions and using many image improving techniques, though we consider this excessive. Expect a 9% performance boost when compared to the standard card. |
---|
Recommended CPU | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Possible GPU Upgrades | - | - | |||
GPU Variants | - | - |