Recommended System Requirements | ||
---|---|---|
Game | Radeon R7 250X Crossfire | GeForce GTX 780 |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 136% | 30% |
Hitman 3 | 207% | 69% |
Assassins Creed: Valhalla | 116% | 19% |
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War | 109% | 15% |
FIFA 21 | 19% | 34% |
Grand Theft Auto VI | 232% | 83% |
Far Cry 6 | 242% | 88% |
Genshin Impact | 136% | 30% |
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands | 239% | 86% |
Battlefield 6 | 207% | 69% |
In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 are significantly better than the AMD Radeon R7 250X Crossfire.
The R7 250X has a 87 MHz higher core clock speed than the GeForce GTX 780, but the GeForce GTX 780 has 112 more Texture Mapping Units than the R7 250X. As a result, the GeForce GTX 780 exhibits a 89.7 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the R7 250X. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.
The R7 250X has a 87 MHz higher core clock speed than the GeForce GTX 780, but the GeForce GTX 780 has 16 more Render Output Units than the R7 250X. As a result, the GeForce GTX 780 exhibits a 11 GPixel/s better Pixel Fill Rate than the R7 250X. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.
The R7 250X was released less than a year after the GeForce GTX 780, and so they are likely to have similar driver support for optimizing performance when running the latest games.
The R7 250X has 1024 MB more video memory than the GeForce GTX 780, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. However, overall, the GeForce GTX 780 has superior memory performance.
The GeForce GTX 780 has 144.4 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the R7 250X, which means that the memory performance of the GeForce GTX 780 is massively better than the R7 250X.
The Radeon R7 250X Crossfire has 1280 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GTX 780 has 2304. However, the actual shader performance of the R7 250X is 1034 and the actual shader performance of the GeForce GTX 780 is 2078. The GeForce GTX 780 having 1044 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the GeForce GTX 780 delivers a massively smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the R7 250X.
The Radeon R7 250X Crossfire requires 160 Watts to run and the GeForce GTX 780 requires 250 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 450 Watts for the R7 250X and a PSU with at least 600 Watts for the GeForce GTX 780. The GeForce GTX 780 requires 90 Watts more than the R7 250X to run. The difference is significant enough that the GeForce GTX 780 may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the R7 250X.
Core Speed | 950 MHz | ![]() | vs | 863 MHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Boost Clock | - | vs | ![]() | 902 MHz | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 Cape Verde XT (x2) | Kepler GK110-300-A1 | |||
OC Potential | Fair |
![]() |
vs |
![]() | Fair |
Driver Support | Good | vs | Good | ||
Release Date | 10 Feb 2014 | ![]() | vs | 23 May 2013 | |
GPU Link | GD Link | GD Link | |||
Approved | ![]() | ![]() | |||
Comparison |
1366x768 | - | vs | ![]() |
10
|
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1600x900 | - | vs | ![]() |
10
|
|
1920x1080 | 6.9
|
vs | ![]() |
9.3
|
|
2560x1440 | - | vs | ![]() |
6.8
|
|
3840x2160 | - | vs | ![]() |
5.2
|
Memory | 4096 MB | ![]() | vs | 3072 MB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Memory Speed | 1125 MHz | vs | ![]() | 1502 MHz | |
Memory Bus | 256 Bit | vs | ![]() | 384 Bit | |
Memory Type | GDDR5 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | GDDR5 |
Memory Bandwidth | 144GB/sec | vs | ![]() | 288.4GB/sec | |
L2 Cache | 1024 KB | vs | ![]() |
1536 KB | |
Delta Color Compression | no | vs | no | ||
Memory Performance | 0% | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
0% |
Comparison |
Shader Processing Units | 1280 | vs | ![]() | 2304 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual Shader Performance | 50% | vs | ![]() | 100% | |
Technology | 28nm | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 28nm |
Texture Mapping Units | 80 | vs | ![]() | 192 | |
Texture Rate | 76 GTexel/s | vs | ![]() | 165.7 GTexel/s | |
Render Output Units | 32 | vs | ![]() | 48 | |
Pixel Rate | 30.4 GPixel/s | vs | ![]() | 41.4 GPixel/s | |
Comparison |
Max Digital Resolution (WxH) | 4096x2160 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 4096x2160 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGA Connections | 0 | vs | 0 | ||
DVI Connections | 1 | vs | ![]() | 2 | |
HDMI Connections | 1 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1 |
DisplayPort Connections | - | vs | - | ||
Comparison |
Max Power | 160 Watts | ![]() | vs | 250 Watts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended PSU | 450 Watts & 20 Amps | ![]() | vs | 600 Watts & 42 Amps |
DirectX | 12.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 12.0 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shader Model | 5.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 5.0 |
Open GL | 4.4 | vs | ![]() | 4.5 | |
Open CL | - | vs | - | ||
Notebook GPU | no | no | |||
SLI/Crossfire | no | vs | ![]() | yes | |
Dedicated | yes | ![]() | vs | ![]() | yes |
Comparison |
Recommended Processor | Intel Core i3-4130 3.4GHz | ![]() | vs | Intel Core i7-4770K 4-Core 3.5GHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended RAM | 8 GB | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 8 GB |
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution | 1600x900 | vs | ![]() | 2560x1440 |
Performance Value | ![]() |
---|
Mini Review | The Crossfire solution of Radeon R7 250X. Expect performance close to a single Radeon HD 7870. | GeForce GTX 780 is a high-end graphics-card based on the 28nm, Kepler architecture. It's based on the Kepler GK110 Core (same used on Titan) but with 12 SMX activated and therefore offers 2304 Shader Processing Units, 192 TMUs and 48 ROPs on a 384-bit memory interface of fast GDDR5. While the central unit runs at 863MHz and goes up to 902MHz in Turbo, the memory clock operates at 1502MHz. It consumes up to 250W. Benchmarks indicate that its performance is up to 30% better than previous GeForce GTX 680 and thus allows even the most demanding games to be playable at the highest settings, at 1080p. With proper overclocking and cooling, it can surpass GeForce GTX Titan. |
---|
Recommended CPU | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Possible GPU Upgrades | - | - | |||
GPU Variants | - |