Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game GeForce GTX 750 Zotac 1GB Edition FirePro S9000
Cyberpunk 2077 316% 200%
Call of Duty Warzone 203% 118%
Horizon: Zero Dawn 203% 118%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 316% 200%
Valorant 70% 79%
Hyper Scape 183% 104%
Grand Theft Auto VI 363% 234%
Doom Eternal 208% 122%
Death Stranding 220% 131%
F1 2020 245% 149%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD FirePro S9000 are significantly better than the Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Zotac 1GB Edition.

The GTX 750 has a 133 MHz higher core clock speed than the FirePro S9000, but the FirePro S9000 has 80 more Texture Mapping Units than the GTX 750. As a result, the FirePro S9000 exhibits a 67.7 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the GTX 750. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The GTX 750 has a 133 MHz higher core clock speed than the FirePro S9000, but the FirePro S9000 has 16 more Render Output Units than the GTX 750. As a result, the FirePro S9000 exhibits a 12.3 GPixel/s better Pixel Fill Rate than the GTX 750. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The GTX 750 was released over a year more recently than the FirePro S9000, and so the GTX 750 is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the FirePro S9000.

The FirePro S9000 has 5120 MB more video memory than the GTX 750, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the FirePro S9000 also has superior memory performance overall.

The FirePro S9000 has 184 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GTX 750, which means that the memory performance of the FirePro S9000 is massively better than the GTX 750.

The GeForce GTX 750 Zotac 1GB Edition has 512 Shader Processing Units and the FirePro S9000 has 1792. However, the actual shader performance of the GTX 750 is 768 and the actual shader performance of the FirePro S9000 is 1371. The FirePro S9000 having 603 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the FirePro S9000 delivers a massively smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the GTX 750.

The GeForce GTX 750 Zotac 1GB Edition requires 55 Watts to run and the FirePro S9000 requires 225 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 300 Watts for the GTX 750. The FirePro S9000 requires 170 Watts more than the GTX 750 to run. The difference is significant enough that the FirePro S9000 may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the GTX 750.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed1033 MHzvs900 MHz
Boost Clock1111 MHzvs-
ArchitectureMaxwell GM107-300-A2GCN 1.0 Tahiti PRO GL
OC Potential Good vs Fair
Driver Support Great vs Good
Release Date18 Feb 2014vs01 Aug 2012
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768 - green tick vs green tick -
1600x900
7.7
green tick vs -
1920x1080
5.9
green tick vs -
2560x1440
4.1
green tick vs -
3840x2160
2.6
green tick vs -

GPU Memory

Memory1024 MBvs6144 MB
Memory Speed1250 MHzvs1375 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs384 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth80GB/secvs264GB/sec
L2 Cache 2048 KB green tick vs 768 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units512vs1792
Actual Shader Performance37%vs66%
Technology28nmvs28nm
Texture Mapping Units32vs112
Texture Rate33.1 GTexel/svs100.8 GTexel/s
Render Output Units16vs32
Pixel Rate16.5 GPixel/svs28.8 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)4096x2160vs4096x2160
VGA Connections1vs0
DVI Connections1vs0
HDMI Connections1vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power55 Wattsvs225 Watts
Recommended PSU300 Watts & 18 Amps-

GPU Features

DirectX12.0vs12.0
Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.5vs4.4
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsyes
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i3-4130 3.4GHz-
Recommended RAM8 GB-
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1600x900-

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewGeForce GTX 750 Zotac 1GB Edition is a special edition of the fast-middle-class GeForce GTX 750.
This edition comes with a custom cooling cooling solution which by itself will allow a slight performance boost, as GeForce GTX 750 benefits from the GPU Boost 2.0 technology.
Furthermore, it comes overclocked out of the box in the central unit that was raised from 1020MHz to 1033MHz, while the Turbo Boost is now of 1111MHz, instead of 1085MHz. The operating memory clock was left untouched.
Further overclocking can be achieved easily, as the GPU has great OC potential.
Benchmarks indicate its performance is around 1% better than the reference NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 and thus Radeon R7 260X is still faster.
FirePro S9000 is a server GPU based on the 28nm GCN architecture.
It's based on the Tahiti PRO Core (same used on 7950) and therefore offers 1792 Shader Processing Units, 112 TMUs and 32 ROPs on a 384-bit interface of fast GDDR5. The central unit is clocked 900MHz while the memory clock operates at 1375MHZ.
Compared to Radeon HD 7950, its central unit is slightly higher clocked but overall its gaming performance is lower than Radeon HD 7950 because Radeon HD 7950 benefits from certified gaming drivers which unlock the GCN's architecture potential while FirePro S9000 is made for professional applications. Therefore, expect its performance to be between 1% and 5% worse than Radeon HD 7950.
Recommended CPU
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
GPU Variants
-
-