Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon R9 270X Gigabyte 4GB OC Edition Crossfire GeForce GTX 680 Galaxy Edition
Hitman 3 53% 90%
Cyberpunk 2077 18% 46%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 8% 34%
FIFA 21 41% 26%
Grand Theft Auto VI 66% 105%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 4% 29%
Resident Evil 8 18% 46%
Genshin Impact 18% 46%
Far Cry 6 71% 111%
The Medium 47% 82%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon R9 270X Gigabyte 4GB OC Edition Crossfire are noticeably better than the Nvidia GeForce GTX 680 Galaxy Edition.

The GTX 680 has a 60 MHz higher core clock speed than the R9 270X, but the R9 270X has 32 more Texture Mapping Units than the GTX 680. As a result, the R9 270X exhibits a 25.9 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the GTX 680. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The GTX 680 has a 60 MHz higher core clock speed than the R9 270X, but the R9 270X has 32 more Render Output Units than the GTX 680. As a result, the R9 270X exhibits a 31.7 GPixel/s better Pixel Fill Rate than the GTX 680. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The R9 270X was released over a year more recently than the GTX 680, and so the R9 270X is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the GTX 680.

Both GPUs exhibit very powerful performance, so it probably isn't worth upgrading from one to the other, as both are capable of running even the most demanding games at the highest settings.

The R9 270X has 4096 MB more video memory than the GTX 680, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the R9 270X also has superior memory performance overall.

The R9 270X has 166.1 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GTX 680, which means that the memory performance of the R9 270X is massively better than the GTX 680.

The Radeon R9 270X Gigabyte 4GB OC Edition Crossfire has 2560 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GTX 680 Galaxy Edition has 1536. However, the actual shader performance of the R9 270X is 2394 and the actual shader performance of the GTX 680 is 1806. The R9 270X having 588 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the R9 270X delivers a massively smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the GTX 680.

The Radeon R9 270X Gigabyte 4GB OC Edition Crossfire requires 180 Watts to run and the GeForce GTX 680 Galaxy Edition requires 195 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 750 Watts for the R9 270X and a PSU with at least 550 Watts for the GTX 680. The GTX 680 requires 15 Watts more than the R9 270X to run. The difference is not significant enough for the GTX 680 to have a noticeably larger impact on your yearly electricity bills than the R9 270X.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed1050 MHzvs1110 MHz
Boost Clock1100 MHzvs1176 MHz
ArchitectureGCN 1.1 Curacao XT (x2)Kepler GK104-400-A2
OC Potential Poor vs Good
Driver Support Great vs Good
Release Date09 Oct 2013vs01 May 2012
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768 - green tick vs green tick -
1600x900 - vs green tick
10
1920x1080
9.7
green tick vs
8.8
2560x1440 - vs green tick
6.4
3840x2160 - vs green tick
4.7

GPU Memory

Memory8192 MBvs4096 MB
Memory Speed1400 MHzvs1502 MHz
Memory Bus512 Bitvs256 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth358.4GB/secvs192.3GB/sec
L2 Cache 1024 KB green tick vs 512 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units2560vs1536
Actual Shader Performance100%vs87%
Technology28nmvs28nm
Texture Mapping Units160vs128
Texture Rate168 GTexel/svs142.1 GTexel/s
Render Output Units64vs32
Pixel Rate67.2 GPixel/svs35.5 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)4096x2160vs4096x2160
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections2vs2
HDMI Connections1vs1
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power180 Wattsvs195 Watts
Recommended PSU750 Watts & 32 Ampsvs550 Watts & 42 Amps

GPU Features

DirectX12.0vs12.0
Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.4vs4.5
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsyes
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i5-4430 3.0GHzvsIntel Core i7-3770K 4-Core 3.5GHz
Recommended RAM8 GBvs8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1920x1080vs1920x1080

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewThis is the Crossfire setup of Radeon R9 270X Gigabyte 4GB OC Edition.GeForce GTX 680 Galaxy Edition is a Special Edition of the powerful GeForce GTX 680. See the standard version for more information about it.
Compared to the standard version, GeForce GTX 680 Galaxy Edition features an increased core-clock that went from 1006MHz to 1110MHz and the turbo boost from 1100MHz to 1176MHz. The amount of memory was also increased from 2GB to 4GB, proving useful if gaming at high resolutions and using many image improving techniques, though we consider this excessive.
Expect a 9% performance boost when compared to the standard card.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
-
GPU Variants
-
-