Recommended System Requirements | ||
---|---|---|
Game | Radeon R7 260X v2 PowerColor OC 1GB Edition | Radeon HD 7750 Club3D Low Profile Edition |
Hitman 3 | 316% | 568% |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 220% | 414% |
Assassins Creed: Valhalla | 192% | 370% |
FIFA 21 | 61% | 159% |
Grand Theft Auto VI | 350% | 623% |
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War | 183% | 355% |
Resident Evil 8 | 220% | 414% |
Genshin Impact | 220% | 414% |
Far Cry 6 | 363% | 643% |
The Medium | 299% | 541% |
In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon R7 260X v2 PowerColor OC 1GB Edition are significantly better than the AMD Radeon HD 7750 Club3D Low Profile Edition.
The R7 260X has a 230 MHz higher core clock speed and 24 more Texture Mapping Units than the HD 7750. This results in the R7 260X providing 32.1 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.
The R7 260X has a 230 MHz higher core clock speed than the HD 7750 and the same number of Render Output Units. This results in the R7 260X providing 3.7 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.
The R7 260X was released over a year more recently than the HD 7750, and so the R7 260X is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the HD 7750.
The Radeon R7 260X v2 PowerColor OC 1GB Edition and the Radeon HD 7750 Club3D Low Profile Edition have the same amount of video memory, but are likely to provide slightly different experiences when displaying game textures at high resolutions.
The R7 260X has 24 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the HD 7750, which means that the memory performance of the R7 260X is slightly better than the HD 7750.
The Radeon R7 260X v2 PowerColor OC 1GB Edition has 896 Shader Processing Units and the Radeon HD 7750 Club3D Low Profile Edition has 512. However, the actual shader performance of the R7 260X is 784 and the actual shader performance of the HD 7750 is 348. The R7 260X having 436 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the R7 260X delivers a significantly smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the HD 7750.
The Radeon R7 260X v2 PowerColor OC 1GB Edition requires 105 Watts to run and the Radeon HD 7750 Club3D Low Profile Edition requires 61 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 500 Watts for the R7 260X and a PSU with at least 450 Watts for the HD 7750. The R7 260X requires 44 Watts more than the HD 7750 to run. The difference is significant enough that the R7 260X may have a slight adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the HD 7750.
Core Speed | 1030 MHz | ![]() | vs | 800 MHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Boost Clock | - | vs | - | ||
Architecture | GCN 1.1 Bonaire XT | GCN 1.0 Cape Verde PRO | |||
OC Potential | Fair | vs |
![]() | Good | |
Driver Support | Good | vs | Good | ||
Release Date | 08 Oct 2013 | ![]() | vs | 01 Aug 2012 | |
GPU Link | GD Link | GD Link | |||
Approved | ![]() | ![]() | |||
Comparison |
1366x768 | 9.9
|
![]() |
vs | 8.1
|
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1600x900 | 7.7
|
![]() |
vs | 5.6
|
|
1920x1080 | 5.9
|
![]() |
vs | 4.6
|
|
2560x1440 | 4.2
|
![]() |
vs | 3
|
|
3840x2160 | 2.5
|
![]() |
vs | 2.1
|
Memory | 1024 MB | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1024 MB |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Memory Speed | 1500 MHz | ![]() | vs | 1125 MHz | |
Memory Bus | 128 Bit | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 128 Bit |
Memory Type | GDDR5 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | GDDR5 |
Memory Bandwidth | 96GB/sec | ![]() | vs | 72GB/sec | |
L2 Cache | 512 KB | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
512 KB |
Delta Color Compression | no | vs | no | ||
Memory Performance | 0% | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
0% |
Comparison |
Shader Processing Units | 896 | ![]() | vs | 512 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual Shader Performance | 38% | ![]() | vs | 17% | |
Technology | 28nm | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 28nm |
Texture Mapping Units | 56 | ![]() | vs | 32 | |
Texture Rate | 57.7 GTexel/s | ![]() | vs | 25.6 GTexel/s | |
Render Output Units | 16 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 16 |
Pixel Rate | 16.5 GPixel/s | ![]() | vs | 12.8 GPixel/s | |
Comparison |
Max Digital Resolution (WxH) | 4096x2160 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 4096x2160 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGA Connections | 0 | vs | ![]() | 1 | |
DVI Connections | 2 | ![]() | vs | 1 | |
HDMI Connections | 1 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1 |
DisplayPort Connections | 1 | ![]() | vs | - | |
Comparison |
Max Power | 105 Watts | vs | ![]() | 61 Watts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended PSU | 500 Watts & 33 Amps | vs | ![]() | 450 Watts |
DirectX | 12.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 12.0 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shader Model | 5.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 5.0 |
Open GL | 4.4 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 4.4 |
Open CL | - | vs | - | ||
Notebook GPU | no | no | |||
SLI/Crossfire | yes | ![]() | vs | ![]() | yes |
Dedicated | yes | ![]() | vs | ![]() | yes |
Comparison |
Recommended Processor | Intel Core i3-4130 3.4GHz | vs | ![]() | Intel Core i3-3240 3.4GHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended RAM | 8 GB | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 8 GB |
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution | 1600x900 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1600x900 |
Performance Value | ![]() |
---|
Mini Review | Overview Radeon R7 260X v2 PowerColor OC 1GB Edition is a Special Edition of AMD's Fast-Middle-Class Radeon R7 260X v2, created by PowerColor. Overclock: Central Unit The Central Unit has been increased from 1000MHz to 1030MHz. Overclock: Memory Clock None. Frame Buffer Untouched. Cooling Solution Untouched. Performance Benchmarks Indicate a 1% Performance Boost over the Reference Radeon R7 260X v2. | Radeon HD 7750 Club3D Low Profile Edition is a special edition of the fast-middle-class Radeon HD 7750. This edition comes optimized for power saving in a way it does not require any power connector but its max TDP is up to 61 Watts. Therefore, its performance is on level with the standard version. |
---|
Recommended CPU | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Possible GPU Upgrades | |||||
GPU Variants | - | - |