Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game FirePro S9050 GeForce GTX 750 Zotac 1GB Edition
Cyberpunk 2077 200% 316%
Call of Duty Warzone 118% 203%
Valorant 79% 70%
Grand Theft Auto VI 234% 363%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 200% 316%
Doom Eternal 122% 208%
Death Stranding 131% 220%
Marvel's Avengers 200% 316%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 104% 183%
Mount and Blade 2: Bannerlord 110% 191%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD FirePro S9050 are significantly better than the Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Zotac 1GB Edition.

The GTX 750 has a 133 MHz higher core clock speed than the FirePro S9050, but the FirePro S9050 has 80 more Texture Mapping Units than the GTX 750. As a result, the FirePro S9050 exhibits a 67.7 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the GTX 750. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The GTX 750 has a 133 MHz higher core clock speed than the FirePro S9050, but the FirePro S9050 has 16 more Render Output Units than the GTX 750. As a result, the FirePro S9050 exhibits a 12.3 GPixel/s better Pixel Fill Rate than the GTX 750. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The FirePro S9050 was released less than a year after the GTX 750, and so they are likely to have similar driver support for optimizing performance when running the latest games.

The FirePro S9050 has 11264 MB more video memory than the GTX 750, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the FirePro S9050 also has superior memory performance overall.

The FirePro S9050 has 184 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GTX 750, which means that the memory performance of the FirePro S9050 is massively better than the GTX 750.

The FirePro S9050 has 1792 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GTX 750 Zotac 1GB Edition has 512. However, the actual shader performance of the FirePro S9050 is 1371 and the actual shader performance of the GTX 750 is 768. The FirePro S9050 having 603 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the FirePro S9050 delivers a massively smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the GTX 750.

The FirePro S9050 requires 225 Watts to run and the GeForce GTX 750 Zotac 1GB Edition requires 55 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 300 Watts for the GTX 750, but we do not have a recommended PSU wattage for the FirePro S9050. The FirePro S9050 requires 170 Watts more than the GTX 750 to run. The difference is significant enough that the FirePro S9050 may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the GTX 750.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed900 MHzvs1033 MHz
Boost Clock-vs1111 MHz
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 Tahiti PRO GLMaxwell GM107-300-A2
OC Potential Poor vs Good
Driver Support Good vs Great
Release Date01 Aug 2014vs18 Feb 2014
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768 - green tick vs green tick -
1600x900 - vs green tick
7.7
1920x1080 - vs green tick
5.9
2560x1440 - vs green tick
4.1
3840x2160 - vs green tick
2.6

GPU Memory

Memory12288 MBvs1024 MB
Memory Speed1375 MHzvs1250 MHz
Memory Bus384 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth264GB/secvs80GB/sec
L2 Cache 768 KB vs green tick 2048 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units1792vs512
Actual Shader Performance66%vs37%
Technology28nmvs28nm
Texture Mapping Units112vs32
Texture Rate100.8 GTexel/svs33.1 GTexel/s
Render Output Units32vs16
Pixel Rate28.8 GPixel/svs16.5 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)4096x2160vs4096x2160
VGA Connections0vs1
DVI Connections0vs1
HDMI Connections0vs1
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power225 Wattsvs55 Watts
Recommended PSU-300 Watts & 18 Amps

GPU Features

DirectX12.0vs12.0
Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.4vs4.5
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfireyesvsno
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor-Intel Core i3-4130 3.4GHz
Recommended RAM12 GBvs8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution2560x1600vs1600x900

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewFirePro S9050 is a server GPU based on the 28nm GCN architecture.
It's based on the Tahiti PRO Core (same used on 7950) and therefore offers 1792 Shader Processing Units, 112 TMUs and 32 ROPs on a 384-bit interface of fast GDDR5. The central unit is clocked 900MHz while the memory clock operates at 1375MHZ.
Compared to Radeon HD 7950, its central unit is slightly higher clocked but overall its gaming performance is lower than Radeon HD 7950 because Radeon HD 7950 benefits from certified gaming drivers which unlock the GCN's architecture potential while FirePro S9050 is made for professional applications. Therefore, expect its performance to be similar to Radeon HD 7950.
GeForce GTX 750 Zotac 1GB Edition is a special edition of the fast-middle-class GeForce GTX 750.
This edition comes with a custom cooling cooling solution which by itself will allow a slight performance boost, as GeForce GTX 750 benefits from the GPU Boost 2.0 technology.
Furthermore, it comes overclocked out of the box in the central unit that was raised from 1020MHz to 1033MHz, while the Turbo Boost is now of 1111MHz, instead of 1085MHz. The operating memory clock was left untouched.
Further overclocking can be achieved easily, as the GPU has great OC potential.
Benchmarks indicate its performance is around 1% better than the reference NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 and thus Radeon R7 260X is still faster.
Recommended CPU
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
GPU Variants
-
-