Recommended System Requirements | ||
---|---|---|
Game | FirePro S9050 | Radeon R7 260X v2 PowerColor OC 1GB Edition |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 131% | 220% |
Assassins Creed: Valhalla | 111% | 192% |
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War | 104% | 183% |
FIFA 21 | 16% | 61% |
Grand Theft Auto VI | 224% | 350% |
Hitman 3 | 200% | 316% |
Genshin Impact | 131% | 220% |
Far Cry 6 | 234% | 363% |
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands | 231% | 358% |
Watch Dogs Legion | 122% | 208% |
In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD FirePro S9050 are significantly better than the AMD Radeon R7 260X v2 PowerColor OC 1GB Edition.
The R7 260X has a 130 MHz higher core clock speed than the FirePro S9050, but the FirePro S9050 has 56 more Texture Mapping Units than the R7 260X. As a result, the FirePro S9050 exhibits a 43.1 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the R7 260X. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.
The R7 260X has a 130 MHz higher core clock speed than the FirePro S9050, but the FirePro S9050 has 16 more Render Output Units than the R7 260X. As a result, the FirePro S9050 exhibits a 12.3 GPixel/s better Pixel Fill Rate than the R7 260X. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.
The FirePro S9050 was released less than a year after the R7 260X, and so they are likely to have similar driver support for optimizing performance when running the latest games.
The FirePro S9050 has 11264 MB more video memory than the R7 260X, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the FirePro S9050 also has superior memory performance overall.
The FirePro S9050 has 168 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the R7 260X, which means that the memory performance of the FirePro S9050 is massively better than the R7 260X.
The FirePro S9050 has 1792 Shader Processing Units and the Radeon R7 260X v2 PowerColor OC 1GB Edition has 896. However, the actual shader performance of the FirePro S9050 is 1371 and the actual shader performance of the R7 260X is 784. The FirePro S9050 having 587 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the FirePro S9050 delivers a massively smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the R7 260X.
The FirePro S9050 requires 225 Watts to run and the Radeon R7 260X v2 PowerColor OC 1GB Edition requires 105 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 500 Watts for the R7 260X, but we do not have a recommended PSU wattage for the FirePro S9050. The FirePro S9050 requires 120 Watts more than the R7 260X to run. The difference is significant enough that the FirePro S9050 may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the R7 260X.
Core Speed | 900 MHz | vs | ![]() | 1030 MHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Boost Clock | - | vs | - | ||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 Tahiti PRO GL | GCN 1.1 Bonaire XT | |||
OC Potential | Poor | vs |
![]() | Fair | |
Driver Support | Good | vs | Good | ||
Release Date | 01 Aug 2014 | ![]() | vs | 08 Oct 2013 | |
GPU Link | GD Link | GD Link | |||
Approved | ![]() | ![]() | |||
Comparison |
1366x768 | - | vs | ![]() |
9.9
|
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1600x900 | - | vs | ![]() |
7.7
|
|
1920x1080 | - | vs | ![]() |
5.9
|
|
2560x1440 | - | vs | ![]() |
4.2
|
|
3840x2160 | - | vs | ![]() |
2.5
|
Memory | 12288 MB | ![]() | vs | 1024 MB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Memory Speed | 1375 MHz | vs | ![]() | 1500 MHz | |
Memory Bus | 384 Bit | ![]() | vs | 128 Bit | |
Memory Type | GDDR5 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | GDDR5 |
Memory Bandwidth | 264GB/sec | ![]() | vs | 96GB/sec | |
L2 Cache | 768 KB | ![]() |
vs | 512 KB | |
Delta Color Compression | no | vs | no | ||
Memory Performance | 0% | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
0% |
Comparison |
Shader Processing Units | 1792 | ![]() | vs | 896 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual Shader Performance | 66% | ![]() | vs | 38% | |
Technology | 28nm | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 28nm |
Texture Mapping Units | 112 | ![]() | vs | 56 | |
Texture Rate | 100.8 GTexel/s | ![]() | vs | 57.7 GTexel/s | |
Render Output Units | 32 | ![]() | vs | 16 | |
Pixel Rate | 28.8 GPixel/s | ![]() | vs | 16.5 GPixel/s | |
Comparison |
Max Digital Resolution (WxH) | 4096x2160 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 4096x2160 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGA Connections | 0 | vs | 0 | ||
DVI Connections | 0 | vs | ![]() | 2 | |
HDMI Connections | 0 | vs | ![]() | 1 | |
DisplayPort Connections | - | vs | ![]() | 1 | |
Comparison |
Max Power | 225 Watts | vs | ![]() | 105 Watts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended PSU | - | 500 Watts & 33 Amps |
DirectX | 12.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 12.0 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shader Model | 5.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 5.0 |
Open GL | 4.4 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 4.4 |
Open CL | - | vs | - | ||
Notebook GPU | no | no | |||
SLI/Crossfire | yes | ![]() | vs | ![]() | yes |
Dedicated | yes | ![]() | vs | ![]() | yes |
Comparison |
Recommended Processor | - | Intel Core i3-4130 3.4GHz | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended RAM | 12 GB | vs | ![]() | 8 GB | |
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution | 2560x1600 | ![]() | vs | 1600x900 |
Performance Value | ![]() |
---|
Mini Review | FirePro S9050 is a server GPU based on the 28nm GCN architecture. It's based on the Tahiti PRO Core (same used on 7950) and therefore offers 1792 Shader Processing Units, 112 TMUs and 32 ROPs on a 384-bit interface of fast GDDR5. The central unit is clocked 900MHz while the memory clock operates at 1375MHZ. Compared to Radeon HD 7950, its central unit is slightly higher clocked but overall its gaming performance is lower than Radeon HD 7950 because Radeon HD 7950 benefits from certified gaming drivers which unlock the GCN's architecture potential while FirePro S9050 is made for professional applications. Therefore, expect its performance to be similar to Radeon HD 7950. | Overview Radeon R7 260X v2 PowerColor OC 1GB Edition is a Special Edition of AMD's Fast-Middle-Class Radeon R7 260X v2, created by PowerColor. Overclock: Central Unit The Central Unit has been increased from 1000MHz to 1030MHz. Overclock: Memory Clock None. Frame Buffer Untouched. Cooling Solution Untouched. Performance Benchmarks Indicate a 1% Performance Boost over the Reference Radeon R7 260X v2. |
---|
Recommended CPU | - | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Possible GPU Upgrades | - | ||||
GPU Variants | - | - |