Recommended System Requirements | ||
---|---|---|
Game | FirePro S9050 | GeForce GTX 780 |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 131% | 30% |
Hitman 3 | 200% | 69% |
Assassins Creed: Valhalla | 111% | 19% |
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War | 104% | 15% |
FIFA 21 | 16% | 34% |
Grand Theft Auto VI | 224% | 83% |
Far Cry 6 | 234% | 88% |
Genshin Impact | 131% | 30% |
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands | 231% | 86% |
Battlefield 6 | 200% | 69% |
In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 are significantly better than the AMD FirePro S9050.
The FirePro S9050 has a 37 MHz higher core clock speed than the GeForce GTX 780, but the GeForce GTX 780 has 80 more Texture Mapping Units than the FirePro S9050. As a result, the GeForce GTX 780 exhibits a 64.9 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the FirePro S9050. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.
The FirePro S9050 has a 37 MHz higher core clock speed than the GeForce GTX 780, but the GeForce GTX 780 has 16 more Render Output Units than the FirePro S9050. As a result, the GeForce GTX 780 exhibits a 12.6 GPixel/s better Pixel Fill Rate than the FirePro S9050. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.
The FirePro S9050 was released over a year more recently than the GeForce GTX 780, and so the FirePro S9050 is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the GeForce GTX 780.
The FirePro S9050 has 9216 MB more video memory than the GeForce GTX 780, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. However, overall, the GeForce GTX 780 has superior memory performance.
The GeForce GTX 780 has 24.4 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the FirePro S9050, which means that the memory performance of the GeForce GTX 780 is slightly better than the FirePro S9050.
The FirePro S9050 has 1792 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GTX 780 has 2304. However, the actual shader performance of the FirePro S9050 is 1371 and the actual shader performance of the GeForce GTX 780 is 2078. The GeForce GTX 780 having 707 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the GeForce GTX 780 delivers a massively smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the FirePro S9050.
The FirePro S9050 requires 225 Watts to run and the GeForce GTX 780 requires 250 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 600 Watts for the GeForce GTX 780, but we do not have a recommended PSU wattage for the FirePro S9050. The GeForce GTX 780 requires 25 Watts more than the FirePro S9050 to run. The difference is not significant enough for the GeForce GTX 780 to have a noticeably larger impact on your yearly electricity bills than the FirePro S9050.
Core Speed | 900 MHz | ![]() | vs | 863 MHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Boost Clock | - | vs | ![]() | 902 MHz | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 Tahiti PRO GL | Kepler GK110-300-A1 | |||
OC Potential | Poor | vs |
![]() | Fair | |
Driver Support | Good | vs | Good | ||
Release Date | 01 Aug 2014 | ![]() | vs | 23 May 2013 | |
GPU Link | GD Link | GD Link | |||
Approved | ![]() | ![]() | |||
Comparison |
1366x768 | - | vs | ![]() |
10
|
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1600x900 | - | vs | ![]() |
10
|
|
1920x1080 | - | vs | ![]() |
9.3
|
|
2560x1440 | - | vs | ![]() |
6.8
|
|
3840x2160 | - | vs | ![]() |
5.2
|
Memory | 12288 MB | ![]() | vs | 3072 MB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Memory Speed | 1375 MHz | vs | ![]() | 1502 MHz | |
Memory Bus | 384 Bit | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 384 Bit |
Memory Type | GDDR5 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | GDDR5 |
Memory Bandwidth | 264GB/sec | vs | ![]() | 288.4GB/sec | |
L2 Cache | 768 KB | vs | ![]() |
1536 KB | |
Delta Color Compression | no | vs | no | ||
Memory Performance | 0% | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
0% |
Comparison |
Shader Processing Units | 1792 | vs | ![]() | 2304 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual Shader Performance | 66% | vs | ![]() | 100% | |
Technology | 28nm | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 28nm |
Texture Mapping Units | 112 | vs | ![]() | 192 | |
Texture Rate | 100.8 GTexel/s | vs | ![]() | 165.7 GTexel/s | |
Render Output Units | 32 | vs | ![]() | 48 | |
Pixel Rate | 28.8 GPixel/s | vs | ![]() | 41.4 GPixel/s | |
Comparison |
Max Digital Resolution (WxH) | 4096x2160 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 4096x2160 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGA Connections | 0 | vs | 0 | ||
DVI Connections | 0 | vs | ![]() | 2 | |
HDMI Connections | 0 | vs | ![]() | 1 | |
DisplayPort Connections | - | vs | - | ||
Comparison |
Max Power | 225 Watts | ![]() | vs | 250 Watts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended PSU | - | 600 Watts & 42 Amps |
DirectX | 12.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 12.0 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shader Model | 5.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 5.0 |
Open GL | 4.4 | vs | ![]() | 4.5 | |
Open CL | - | vs | - | ||
Notebook GPU | no | no | |||
SLI/Crossfire | yes | ![]() | vs | ![]() | yes |
Dedicated | yes | ![]() | vs | ![]() | yes |
Comparison |
Recommended Processor | - | Intel Core i7-4770K 4-Core 3.5GHz | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended RAM | 12 GB | vs | ![]() | 8 GB | |
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution | 2560x1600 | ![]() | vs | 2560x1440 |
Performance Value | ![]() |
---|
Mini Review | FirePro S9050 is a server GPU based on the 28nm GCN architecture. It's based on the Tahiti PRO Core (same used on 7950) and therefore offers 1792 Shader Processing Units, 112 TMUs and 32 ROPs on a 384-bit interface of fast GDDR5. The central unit is clocked 900MHz while the memory clock operates at 1375MHZ. Compared to Radeon HD 7950, its central unit is slightly higher clocked but overall its gaming performance is lower than Radeon HD 7950 because Radeon HD 7950 benefits from certified gaming drivers which unlock the GCN's architecture potential while FirePro S9050 is made for professional applications. Therefore, expect its performance to be similar to Radeon HD 7950. | GeForce GTX 780 is a high-end graphics-card based on the 28nm, Kepler architecture. It's based on the Kepler GK110 Core (same used on Titan) but with 12 SMX activated and therefore offers 2304 Shader Processing Units, 192 TMUs and 48 ROPs on a 384-bit memory interface of fast GDDR5. While the central unit runs at 863MHz and goes up to 902MHz in Turbo, the memory clock operates at 1502MHz. It consumes up to 250W. Benchmarks indicate that its performance is up to 30% better than previous GeForce GTX 680 and thus allows even the most demanding games to be playable at the highest settings, at 1080p. With proper overclocking and cooling, it can surpass GeForce GTX Titan. |
---|
Recommended CPU | - | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Possible GPU Upgrades | - | - | |||
GPU Variants | - |