Recommended System Requirements | ||
---|---|---|
Game | Quadro K4200 | GeForce GTX 770 Palit JetStream 2GB Edition |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 188% | 44% |
Hitman 3 | 274% | 87% |
Assassins Creed: Valhalla | 163% | 32% |
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War | 155% | 27% |
FIFA 21 | 45% | 27% |
Grand Theft Auto VI | 305% | 103% |
Far Cry 6 | 316% | 108% |
Genshin Impact | 188% | 44% |
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands | 312% | 107% |
Battlefield 6 | 274% | 87% |
In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 770 Palit JetStream 2GB Edition are significantly better than the Nvidia Quadro K4200.
The GTX 770 has a 444 MHz higher core clock speed and 16 more Texture Mapping Units than the Quadro K4200. This results in the GTX 770 providing 68.1 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.
The GTX 770 has a 444 MHz higher core clock speed than the Quadro K4200 and the same number of Render Output Units. This results in the GTX 770 providing 14.2 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.
The Quadro K4200 was released over a year more recently than the GTX 770, and so the Quadro K4200 is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the GTX 770.
The Quadro K4200 has 2048 MB more video memory than the GTX 770, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. However, overall, the GTX 770 has superior memory performance.
The GTX 770 has 51.5 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the Quadro K4200, which means that the memory performance of the GTX 770 is much better than the Quadro K4200.
The Quadro K4200 has 1344 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GTX 770 Palit JetStream 2GB Edition has 1536. However, the actual shader performance of the Quadro K4200 is 949 and the actual shader performance of the GTX 770 is 1846. The GTX 770 having 897 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the GTX 770 delivers a massively smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the Quadro K4200.
The Quadro K4200 requires 108 Watts to run but there is no entry for the GeForce GTX 770 Palit JetStream 2GB Edition. We would recommend a PSU with at least 500 Watts for the Quadro K4200 and a PSU with at least 550 Watts for the GTX 770. The GTX 770 has been recommended a PSU with 50 Watts more than the Quadro K4200. The difference is significant enough that the GTX 770 may have a slight adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the Quadro K4200.
Core Speed | 706 MHz | vs | ![]() | 1150 MHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Boost Clock | - | vs | ![]() | 1202 MHz | |
Architecture | Kepler GK104 | Kepler GK104-425-A2 | |||
OC Potential | Great |
![]() |
vs | Poor | |
Driver Support | Good | vs | Good | ||
Release Date | 22 Jul 2014 | ![]() | vs | 30 May 2013 | |
GPU Link | GD Link | GD Link | |||
Approved | ![]() | ![]() | |||
Comparison |
1366x768 | - | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
- |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1600x900 | - | vs | ![]() |
10
|
|
1920x1080 | - | vs | ![]() |
8.8
|
|
2560x1440 | - | vs | ![]() |
6.4
|
|
3840x2160 | - | vs | ![]() |
4.8
|
Memory | 4096 MB | ![]() | vs | 2048 MB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Memory Speed | 1350 MHz | vs | ![]() | 1752 MHz | |
Memory Bus | 256 Bit | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 256 Bit |
Memory Type | GDDR5 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | GDDR5 |
Memory Bandwidth | 172.8GB/sec | vs | ![]() | 224.3GB/sec | |
L2 Cache | 512 KB | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
512 KB |
Delta Color Compression | no | vs | no | ||
Memory Performance | 0% | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
0% |
Comparison |
Shader Processing Units | 1344 | vs | ![]() | 1536 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual Shader Performance | 46% | vs | ![]() | 89% | |
Technology | 28nm | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 28nm |
Texture Mapping Units | 112 | vs | ![]() | 128 | |
Texture Rate | 79.1 GTexel/s | vs | ![]() | 147.2 GTexel/s | |
Render Output Units | 32 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 32 |
Pixel Rate | 22.6 GPixel/s | vs | ![]() | 36.8 GPixel/s | |
Comparison |
Max Digital Resolution (WxH) | 4096x2160 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 4096x2160 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGA Connections | 0 | vs | 0 | ||
DVI Connections | 1 | vs | ![]() | 2 | |
HDMI Connections | 0 | vs | ![]() | 1 | |
DisplayPort Connections | - | vs | - | ||
Comparison |
Max Power | 108 Watts | - | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended PSU | 500 Watts & 33 Amps | ![]() | vs | 550 Watts |
DirectX | 12.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 12.0 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shader Model | 5.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 5.0 |
Open GL | 4.5 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 4.5 |
Open CL | - | vs | - | ||
Notebook GPU | no | no | |||
SLI/Crossfire | yes | ![]() | vs | ![]() | yes |
Dedicated | yes | ![]() | vs | ![]() | yes |
Comparison |
Recommended Processor | Intel Core i5-4670K 3.4GHz | vs | Intel Core i5-4670K 3.4GHz | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended RAM | 8 GB | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 8 GB |
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution | 1920x1080 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1920x1080 |
Performance Value | ![]() |
---|
Mini Review | Quadro K4200 is a high-end professional card based on the 28nm, Kepler architecture. It's based on the Kepler GK107 and offers 1344 Shader Processing Units, 112 TMUs and 32 ROPs, on a 256-bit memory interface of fast GDDR5. The central unit runs at 706MHz and the memory clock operates at up to 1350MHz. It has a L2 Cache of 512KB and a rated board TDP of 108 Watts. Quadro K4200's drivers are certified for professional applications only. Its gaming performance is around 10% slower than GeForce GTX 660. | GeForce GTX 770 Palit JetStream 2GB Edition is a special edition of the high-end GeForce GTX 770. This edition comes with a custom triple fan cooling solution which by itself should allow a slight performance boost, as GeForce GTX 770 benefits from the GPU Boost 2.0 technology. Also, it has been overclocked out of the box from 1046MHz to 1150MHz while its boost clock is now of 1202MHz. The memory clock was left untouched. Benchmarks indicate a 6% performance boost when compared to the reference card and so this edition performs very slightly better than GeForce GTX 590. |
---|
Recommended CPU | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Possible GPU Upgrades | - | - | |||
GPU Variants | - | - |