Recommended System Requirements | ||
---|---|---|
Game | Quadro K4200 | GeForce GTX 750 EVGA Superclocked 1GB Edition |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 188% | 205% |
Hitman 3 | 274% | 296% |
Resident Evil 8 | 188% | 205% |
Assassins Creed: Valhalla | 163% | 179% |
FIFA 21 | 45% | 54% |
Grand Theft Auto VI | 305% | 329% |
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War | 155% | 170% |
Genshin Impact | 188% | 205% |
Far Cry 6 | 316% | 341% |
The Medium | 259% | 280% |
In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia Quadro K4200 are very slightly better than the Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 EVGA Superclocked 1GB Edition.
The GTX 750 has a 509 MHz higher core clock speed than the Quadro K4200, but the Quadro K4200 has 80 more Texture Mapping Units than the GTX 750. As a result, the Quadro K4200 exhibits a 40.2 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the GTX 750. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.
The GTX 750 has a 509 MHz higher core clock speed than the Quadro K4200, but the Quadro K4200 has 16 more Render Output Units than the GTX 750. As a result, the Quadro K4200 exhibits a 3.2 GPixel/s better Pixel Fill Rate than the GTX 750. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.
The Quadro K4200 was released less than a year after the GTX 750, and so they are likely to have similar driver support for optimizing performance when running the latest games.
The Quadro K4200 has 3072 MB more video memory than the GTX 750, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the Quadro K4200 also has superior memory performance overall.
The Quadro K4200 has 92.6 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GTX 750, which means that the memory performance of the Quadro K4200 is massively better than the GTX 750.
The Quadro K4200 has 1344 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GTX 750 EVGA Superclocked 1GB Edition has 512. However, the actual shader performance of the Quadro K4200 is 949 and the actual shader performance of the GTX 750 is 894. The Quadro K4200 having 55 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the Quadro K4200 delivers a massively smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the GTX 750.
The Quadro K4200 requires 108 Watts to run and the GeForce GTX 750 EVGA Superclocked 1GB Edition requires 55 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 500 Watts for the Quadro K4200 and a PSU with at least 300 Watts for the GTX 750. The Quadro K4200 requires 53 Watts more than the GTX 750 to run. The difference is significant enough that the Quadro K4200 may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the GTX 750.
Core Speed | 706 MHz | vs | ![]() | 1215 MHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Boost Clock | - | vs | ![]() | 1294 MHz | |
Architecture | Kepler GK104 | Maxwell GM107-300-A2 | |||
OC Potential | Great |
![]() |
vs | Good | |
Driver Support | Good | vs | ![]() |
Great | |
Release Date | 22 Jul 2014 | ![]() | vs | 02 Mar 2014 | |
GPU Link | GD Link | GD Link | |||
Approved | ![]() | ![]() | |||
Comparison |
1366x768 | - | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
- |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1600x900 | - | vs | ![]() |
7.9
|
|
1920x1080 | - | vs | ![]() |
6.1
|
|
2560x1440 | - | vs | ![]() |
4.3
|
|
3840x2160 | - | vs | ![]() |
2.6
|
Memory | 4096 MB | ![]() | vs | 1024 MB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Memory Speed | 1350 MHz | ![]() | vs | 1253 MHz | |
Memory Bus | 256 Bit | ![]() | vs | 128 Bit | |
Memory Type | GDDR5 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | GDDR5 |
Memory Bandwidth | 172.8GB/sec | ![]() | vs | 80.2GB/sec | |
L2 Cache | 512 KB | vs | ![]() |
2048 KB | |
Delta Color Compression | no | vs | no | ||
Memory Performance | 0% | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
0% |
Comparison |
Shader Processing Units | 1344 | ![]() | vs | 512 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual Shader Performance | 46% | ![]() | vs | 43% | |
Technology | 28nm | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 28nm |
Texture Mapping Units | 112 | ![]() | vs | 32 | |
Texture Rate | 79.1 GTexel/s | ![]() | vs | 38.9 GTexel/s | |
Render Output Units | 32 | ![]() | vs | 16 | |
Pixel Rate | 22.6 GPixel/s | ![]() | vs | 19.4 GPixel/s | |
Comparison |
Max Digital Resolution (WxH) | 4096x2160 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 4096x2160 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGA Connections | 0 | vs | 0 | ||
DVI Connections | 1 | vs | ![]() | 2 | |
HDMI Connections | 0 | vs | ![]() | 1 | |
DisplayPort Connections | - | vs | - | ||
Comparison |
Max Power | 108 Watts | vs | ![]() | 55 Watts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended PSU | 500 Watts & 33 Amps | vs | ![]() | 300 Watts & 20 Amps |
DirectX | 12.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 12.0 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shader Model | 5.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 5.0 |
Open GL | 4.5 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 4.5 |
Open CL | - | vs | - | ||
Notebook GPU | no | no | |||
SLI/Crossfire | yes | ![]() | vs | no | |
Dedicated | yes | ![]() | vs | ![]() | yes |
Comparison |
Recommended Processor | Intel Core i5-4670K 3.4GHz | vs | ![]() | Intel Core i3-4130 3.4GHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended RAM | 8 GB | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 8 GB |
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution | 1920x1080 | ![]() | vs | 1600x900 |
Performance Value | ![]() |
---|
Mini Review | Quadro K4200 is a high-end professional card based on the 28nm, Kepler architecture. It's based on the Kepler GK107 and offers 1344 Shader Processing Units, 112 TMUs and 32 ROPs, on a 256-bit memory interface of fast GDDR5. The central unit runs at 706MHz and the memory clock operates at up to 1350MHz. It has a L2 Cache of 512KB and a rated board TDP of 108 Watts. Quadro K4200's drivers are certified for professional applications only. Its gaming performance is around 10% slower than GeForce GTX 660. | GeForce GTX 750 EVGA Superclocked 1GB Edition is a special edition of the fast-middle-class GeForce GTX 750. This edition comes with a custom cooling cooling solution which by itself will allow a slight performance boost, as GeForce GTX 750 benefits from the GPU Boost 2.0 technology. Furthermore, it comes overclocked out of the box in the central unit that was raised from 1020MHz to 1215MHz, while the Turbo Boost is now of 1294MHz, instead of 1085MHz. The operating memory clock was left untouched. Further overclocking can be achieved easily, as the GPU has great OC potential. Benchmarks indicate its performance is around 6% better than the reference card. |
---|
Recommended CPU | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Possible GPU Upgrades | - | ||||
GPU Variants | - | - |