Recommended System Requirements | ||
---|---|---|
Game | Radeon R7 240 2GB | GeForce 7900 GTX |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 786% | 1149% |
Hitman 3 | 1053% | 1524% |
Assassins Creed: Valhalla | 711% | 1042% |
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War | 684% | 1005% |
FIFA 21 | 347% | 530% |
Grand Theft Auto VI | 1147% | 1657% |
Far Cry 6 | 1182% | 1707% |
Genshin Impact | 786% | 1149% |
Battlefield 6 | 1053% | 1524% |
Resident Evil 8 | 786% | 1149% |
In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon R7 240 2GB are significantly better than the Nvidia GeForce 7900 GTX.
The R7 240 was released over three years more recently than the GeForce 7900 GTX, and so the R7 240 is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the GeForce 7900 GTX when running the latest games.
The R7 240 has 1536 MB more video memory than the GeForce 7900 GTX, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. However, the overall memory performance is about the same.
The GeForce 7900 GTX has 22.4 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the R7 240, which means that the memory performance of the GeForce 7900 GTX is slightly better than the R7 240.
The Radeon R7 240 2GB has 320 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce 7900 GTX has 24. However, the actual shader performance of the R7 240 is 212 and the actual shader performance of the GeForce 7900 GTX is 16. The R7 240 having 196 better shader performance is not particularly notable, as altogether the GeForce 7900 GTX performs better when taking into account other relevant data.
The Radeon R7 240 2GB requires 30 Watts to run and the GeForce 7900 GTX requires 84 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 400 Watts for the R7 240 and a PSU with at least 400 Watts for the GeForce 7900 GTX. The GeForce 7900 GTX requires 54 Watts more than the R7 240 to run. The difference is significant enough that the GeForce 7900 GTX may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the R7 240.
Core Speed | 730 MHz | ![]() | vs | 650 MHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Boost Clock | 780 MHz | ![]() | vs | - | |
Architecture | GCN 1.1 Oland PRO | G71 | |||
OC Potential | Good |
![]() |
vs | Poor | |
Driver Support | Great |
![]() | vs | - | |
Release Date | 08 Oct 2013 | ![]() | vs | 01 Mar 2006 | |
GPU Link | GD Link | GD Link | |||
Approved | ![]() | ![]() | |||
Comparison |
1366x768 | 6.4
|
![]() |
vs | - | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1600x900 | 4.9
|
![]() |
vs | - | |
1920x1080 | 3.1
|
![]() |
vs | - | |
2560x1440 | 2.3
|
![]() |
vs | - | |
3840x2160 | 1.5
|
![]() |
vs | - |
Memory | 2048 MB | ![]() | vs | 512 MB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Memory Speed | 900 MHz | ![]() | vs | 800 MHz | |
Memory Bus | 128 Bit | vs | ![]() | 256 Bit | |
Memory Type | DDR3 | vs | ![]() | GDDR3 | |
Memory Bandwidth | 28.8GB/sec | vs | ![]() | 51.2GB/sec | |
L2 Cache | 512 KB | ![]() |
vs | - | |
Delta Color Compression | no | vs | no | ||
Memory Performance | 0% | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
0% |
Comparison |
Shader Processing Units | 320 | ![]() | vs | 24 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual Shader Performance | 10% | ![]() | vs | 1% | |
Technology | 28nm | ![]() | vs | - | |
Texture Mapping Units | 20 | ![]() | vs | - | |
Texture Rate | 14.6 GTexel/s | ![]() | vs | - | |
Render Output Units | 8 | ![]() | vs | - | |
Pixel Rate | 5.8 GPixel/s | ![]() | vs | - | |
Comparison |
Max Digital Resolution (WxH) | 4096x2160 | ![]() | vs | 2560x1600 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGA Connections | 1 | ![]() | vs | 0 | |
DVI Connections | 1 | vs | ![]() | 2 | |
HDMI Connections | 1 | ![]() | vs | 0 | |
DisplayPort Connections | - | vs | - | ||
Comparison |
Max Power | 30 Watts | ![]() | vs | 84 Watts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended PSU | 400 Watts & 18 Amps | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 400 Watts & 26 Amps |
DirectX | 12.0 | ![]() | vs | 9.0c | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shader Model | 5.0 | ![]() | vs | 3.0 | |
Open GL | 4.4 | ![]() | vs | 2.0 | |
Open CL | - | vs | - | ||
Notebook GPU | no | no | |||
SLI/Crossfire | no | vs | no | ||
Dedicated | yes | ![]() | vs | ![]() | yes |
Comparison |
Recommended Processor | Intel Core i3-4130 3.4GHz | - | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended RAM | 4 GB | - | |||
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution | 1366x768 | ![]() | - |
Performance Value | ![]() |
---|
Mini Review | Note: This Graphics Card has 2 variants: one with DDR3 and another with GDDR5. This is the DDR3 Version. Radeon R7 240 2GB offers a core codenamed Oland PRO and thus features 320 Shader Processing Units, 20 TMUs and 8 ROPs, on a 128-bit bus width of standard DDR3. While the central unit runs at 730MHz and goes up to 780MHz, in Turbo Mode, the memory clock operates at 900MHz. With a rated board TDP of 30W, it requires no extra power connectors. Compared to Radeon R7 250, its performance is significantly lower (over 25% slower), especially at higher resolutions due to the limited memory bandwidth. Still, the TDP is relatively low and so this card may be used on low end systems and offer a reasonable upgrade, when compared to integrated graphics. | The NVIDIA GeForce 7 Series graphics processing units (GPUs) represent a significant leap forward in 3D graphics design, delivering the unparalleled horsepower and revolutionary technologies you need to tackle the latest games and video applications. The GeForce 7 Series GPUs deliver blazing frame rates and outstanding image quality so you can experience full-throttle graphics performance. |
---|