Recommended System Requirements | ||
---|---|---|
Game | Radeon R7 240 2GB | Radeon HD 5670 Gigabyte 1GB OC Edition |
Hitman 3 | 1053% | 1006% |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 786% | 750% |
Assassins Creed: Valhalla | 711% | 678% |
Resident Evil 8 | 786% | 750% |
FIFA 21 | 347% | 329% |
Grand Theft Auto VI | 1147% | 1096% |
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War | 684% | 652% |
Genshin Impact | 786% | 750% |
Far Cry 6 | 1182% | 1130% |
The Medium | 1006% | 961% |
In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon HD 5670 Gigabyte 1GB OC Edition are marginally better than the AMD Radeon R7 240 2GB.
The HD 5670 has a 220 MHz higher core clock speed and the same number of Texture Mapping Units as the R7 240. This results in the HD 5670 providing 4.4 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.
The HD 5670 has a 220 MHz higher core clock speed than the R7 240 and the same number of Render Output Units. This results in the HD 5670 providing 1.8 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.
The R7 240 was released over three years more recently than the HD 5670, and so the R7 240 is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the HD 5670 when running the latest games.
The R7 240 has 1024 MB more video memory than the HD 5670, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. However, overall, the HD 5670 has superior memory performance.
The HD 5670 has 35.2 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the R7 240, which means that the memory performance of the HD 5670 is noticeably better than the R7 240.
The Radeon R7 240 2GB has 320 Shader Processing Units and the Radeon HD 5670 Gigabyte 1GB OC Edition has 400. However, the actual shader performance of the R7 240 is 212 and the actual shader performance of the HD 5670 is 190. The R7 240 having 22 better shader performance is not particularly notable, as altogether the HD 5670 performs better when taking into account other relevant data.
The R7 240 transistor size technology is 12 nm (nanometers) smaller than the HD 5670. This means that the R7 240 is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the HD 5670. While they exhibit similar graphical performance, the R7 240 should consume less power than the HD 5670.
The Radeon R7 240 2GB requires 30 Watts to run but there is no entry for the Radeon HD 5670 Gigabyte 1GB OC Edition. We would recommend a PSU with at least 400 Watts for the R7 240.
Core Speed | 730 MHz | vs | ![]() | 950 MHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Boost Clock | 780 MHz | ![]() | vs | - | |
Architecture | GCN 1.1 Oland PRO | Terascale 2 Redwood XT | |||
OC Potential | Good |
![]() |
vs | Poor | |
Driver Support | Great |
![]() | vs | Poor | |
Release Date | 08 Oct 2013 | ![]() | vs | 01 Jan 2010 | |
GPU Link | GD Link | GD Link | |||
Approved | ![]() | ![]() | |||
Comparison |
1366x768 | 6.4
|
![]() |
vs | - | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1600x900 | 4.9
|
![]() |
vs | - | |
1920x1080 | 3.1
|
![]() |
vs | - | |
2560x1440 | 2.3
|
![]() |
vs | - | |
3840x2160 | 1.5
|
![]() |
vs | - |
Memory | 2048 MB | ![]() | vs | 1024 MB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Memory Speed | 900 MHz | vs | ![]() | 1000 MHz | |
Memory Bus | 128 Bit | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 128 Bit |
Memory Type | DDR3 | vs | ![]() | GDDR5 | |
Memory Bandwidth | 28.8GB/sec | vs | ![]() | 64GB/sec | |
L2 Cache | 512 KB | ![]() |
vs | 256 KB | |
Delta Color Compression | no | vs | no | ||
Memory Performance | 0% | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
0% |
Comparison |
Shader Processing Units | 320 | vs | ![]() | 400 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual Shader Performance | 10% | ![]() | vs | 9% | |
Technology | 28nm | ![]() | vs | 40nm | |
Texture Mapping Units | 20 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 20 |
Texture Rate | 14.6 GTexel/s | vs | ![]() | 19 GTexel/s | |
Render Output Units | 8 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 8 |
Pixel Rate | 5.8 GPixel/s | vs | ![]() | 7.6 GPixel/s | |
Comparison |
Max Digital Resolution (WxH) | 4096x2160 | ![]() | vs | 2560x1600 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGA Connections | 1 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1 |
DVI Connections | 1 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1 |
HDMI Connections | 1 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1 |
DisplayPort Connections | - | vs | - | ||
Comparison |
Max Power | 30 Watts | - | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended PSU | 400 Watts & 18 Amps | - |
DirectX | 12.0 | ![]() | vs | 11.0 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shader Model | 5.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 5.0 |
Open GL | 4.4 | ![]() | vs | 4.3 | |
Open CL | - | vs | - | ||
Notebook GPU | no | no | |||
SLI/Crossfire | no | vs | ![]() | yes | |
Dedicated | yes | ![]() | vs | ![]() | yes |
Comparison |
Recommended Processor | Intel Core i3-4130 3.4GHz | vs | ![]() | Intel Pentium Dual Core E5500 2.8GHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended RAM | 4 GB | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 4 GB |
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution | 1366x768 | vs | ![]() | 1440x900 |
Performance Value | ![]() |
---|
Mini Review | Note: This Graphics Card has 2 variants: one with DDR3 and another with GDDR5. This is the DDR3 Version. Radeon R7 240 2GB offers a core codenamed Oland PRO and thus features 320 Shader Processing Units, 20 TMUs and 8 ROPs, on a 128-bit bus width of standard DDR3. While the central unit runs at 730MHz and goes up to 780MHz, in Turbo Mode, the memory clock operates at 900MHz. With a rated board TDP of 30W, it requires no extra power connectors. Compared to Radeon R7 250, its performance is significantly lower (over 25% slower), especially at higher resolutions due to the limited memory bandwidth. Still, the TDP is relatively low and so this card may be used on low end systems and offer a reasonable upgrade, when compared to integrated graphics. | Radeon HD 5670 Gigabyte 1GB OC Edition is a special edition of the middle-class Radeon HD 5670. This edition features a new cooling system and overclocking out of the box in the core-clock from 775MHz to 950MHz. There are no benchmarks available and so this GPU's rank is predicted. |
---|