Recommended System Requirements | ||
---|---|---|
Game | Radeon R7 240 2GB | GeForce GT 430 EVGA 1GB Edition |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 786% | 1156% |
Hitman 3 | 1053% | 1533% |
Resident Evil 8 | 786% | 1156% |
Assassins Creed: Valhalla | 711% | 1048% |
FIFA 21 | 347% | 533% |
Grand Theft Auto VI | 1147% | 1667% |
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War | 684% | 1011% |
Genshin Impact | 786% | 1156% |
Far Cry 6 | 1182% | 1717% |
The Medium | 1006% | 1467% |
In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon R7 240 2GB are significantly better than the Nvidia GeForce GT 430 EVGA 1GB Edition.
The R7 240 has a 30 MHz higher core clock speed and 4 more Texture Mapping Units than the GT 430. This results in the R7 240 providing 3.4 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.
The R7 240 has a 30 MHz higher core clock speed and 4 more Render Output Units than the GT 430. This results in the R7 240 providing 3 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.
The R7 240 was released over three years more recently than the GT 430, and so the R7 240 is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the GT 430 when running the latest games.
The R7 240 has 1024 MB more video memory than the GT 430, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the R7 240 also has superior memory performance overall.
The R7 240 has 3.2 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GT 430, which means that the memory performance of the R7 240 is marginally better than the GT 430.
The Radeon R7 240 2GB has 320 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GT 430 EVGA 1GB Edition has 96. However, the actual shader performance of the R7 240 is 212 and the actual shader performance of the GT 430 is 134. The R7 240 having 78 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the R7 240 delivers a marginally smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the GT 430.
The R7 240 transistor size technology is 12 nm (nanometers) smaller than the GT 430. This means that the R7 240 is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the GT 430.
The Radeon R7 240 2GB requires 30 Watts to run and the GeForce GT 430 EVGA 1GB Edition requires 49 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 400 Watts for the R7 240 and a PSU with at least 300 Watts for the GT 430. The GT 430 requires 19 Watts more than the R7 240 to run. The difference is not significant enough for the GT 430 to have a noticeably larger impact on your yearly electricity bills than the R7 240.
Core Speed | 730 MHz | ![]() | vs | 700 MHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Boost Clock | 780 MHz | ![]() | vs | - | |
Architecture | GCN 1.1 Oland PRO | Fermi GF108-300-A1 | |||
OC Potential | Good |
![]() |
vs | Fair | |
Driver Support | Great |
![]() | vs | Poor | |
Release Date | 08 Oct 2013 | ![]() | vs | 01 Oct 2010 | |
GPU Link | GD Link | GD Link | |||
Approved | ![]() | ![]() | |||
Comparison |
1366x768 | 6.4
|
![]() |
vs | - | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1600x900 | 4.9
|
![]() |
vs | 3.8
|
|
1920x1080 | 3.1
|
![]() |
vs | 2.5
|
|
2560x1440 | 2.3
|
![]() |
vs | 1.9
|
|
3840x2160 | 1.5
|
![]() |
vs | - |
Memory | 2048 MB | ![]() | vs | 1024 MB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Memory Speed | 900 MHz | ![]() | vs | 800 MHz | |
Memory Bus | 128 Bit | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 128 Bit |
Memory Type | DDR3 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | DDR3 |
Memory Bandwidth | 28.8GB/sec | ![]() | vs | 25.6GB/sec | |
L2 Cache | 512 KB | ![]() |
vs | 256 KB | |
Delta Color Compression | no | vs | no | ||
Memory Performance | 0% | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
0% |
Comparison |
Shader Processing Units | 320 | ![]() | vs | 96 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual Shader Performance | 10% | ![]() | vs | 6% | |
Technology | 28nm | ![]() | vs | 40nm | |
Texture Mapping Units | 20 | ![]() | vs | 16 | |
Texture Rate | 14.6 GTexel/s | ![]() | vs | 11.2 GTexel/s | |
Render Output Units | 8 | ![]() | vs | 4 | |
Pixel Rate | 5.8 GPixel/s | ![]() | vs | 2.8 GPixel/s | |
Comparison |
Max Digital Resolution (WxH) | 4096x2160 | ![]() | vs | 2560x1600 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGA Connections | 1 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1 |
DVI Connections | 1 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1 |
HDMI Connections | 1 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1 |
DisplayPort Connections | - | vs | - | ||
Comparison |
Max Power | 30 Watts | ![]() | vs | 49 Watts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended PSU | 400 Watts & 18 Amps | vs | ![]() | 300 Watts & 22 Amps |
DirectX | 12.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 12.0 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shader Model | 5.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 5.0 |
Open GL | 4.4 | vs | ![]() | 4.5 | |
Open CL | - | vs | - | ||
Notebook GPU | no | no | |||
SLI/Crossfire | no | vs | no | ||
Dedicated | yes | ![]() | vs | ![]() | yes |
Comparison |
Recommended Processor | Intel Core i3-4130 3.4GHz | vs | ![]() | Intel Celeron E3400 Dual-Core 2.6GHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended RAM | 4 GB | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 4 GB |
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution | 1366x768 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1366x768 |
Performance Value | ![]() |
---|
Mini Review | Note: This Graphics Card has 2 variants: one with DDR3 and another with GDDR5. This is the DDR3 Version. Radeon R7 240 2GB offers a core codenamed Oland PRO and thus features 320 Shader Processing Units, 20 TMUs and 8 ROPs, on a 128-bit bus width of standard DDR3. While the central unit runs at 730MHz and goes up to 780MHz, in Turbo Mode, the memory clock operates at 900MHz. With a rated board TDP of 30W, it requires no extra power connectors. Compared to Radeon R7 250, its performance is significantly lower (over 25% slower), especially at higher resolutions due to the limited memory bandwidth. Still, the TDP is relatively low and so this card may be used on low end systems and offer a reasonable upgrade, when compared to integrated graphics. | Overview GeForce GT 430 EVGA 1GB Edition is a special edition of NVIDIA's middle-class GeForce GT 430, created by EVGA. Overclock Out of The Box The Clock Frequencies of both Central Unit and Operating Memory Clock Remain the Same. Cooling Solution The Cooling System remains the same. Performance Without Overclocking Out of The Box, GeForce GT 430 EVGA 1GB Edition is as fast as the reference GeForce GT 430. |
---|