Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon R7 240 2GB Radeon R7 7600
Cyberpunk 2077 786% 737%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 711% 666%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 684% 641%
Grand Theft Auto VI 1147% 1078%
FIFA 21 347% 322%
Genshin Impact 786% 737%
Far Cry 6 1182% 1111%
Hitman 3 1053% 989%
Watch Dogs Legion 755% 707%
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands 1171% 1100%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon R7 7600 are very slightly better than the AMD Radeon R7 240 2GB.

The R7 240 has a 10 MHz higher core clock speed than the Radeon R7 7600, but the Radeon R7 7600 has 4 more Texture Mapping Units than the R7 240. As a result, the Radeon R7 7600 exhibits a 2.7 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the R7 240. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The R7 240 has a 10 MHz higher core clock speed than the Radeon R7 7600, but both GPUs exhibit the same Pixel Fill Rate. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The Radeon R7 7600 was released less than a year after the R7 240, and so they are likely to have similar driver support for optimizing performance when running the latest games.

The R7 240 has 2048 MB video memory, but the Radeon R7 7600 does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The Radeon R7 240 2GB has 320 Shader Processing Units and the Radeon R7 7600 has 384. However, the actual shader performance of the R7 240 is 212 and the actual shader performance of the Radeon R7 7600 is 180. The R7 240 having 32 better shader performance is not particularly notable, as altogether the Radeon R7 7600 performs better when taking into account other relevant data.

The Radeon R7 240 2GB requires 30 Watts to run and the Radeon R7 7600 requires 65 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 400 Watts for the R7 240 and a PSU with at least 300 Watts for the Radeon R7 7600. The Radeon R7 7600 requires 35 Watts more than the R7 240 to run. The difference is significant enough that the Radeon R7 7600 may have a slight adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the R7 240.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed730 MHzvs720 MHz
Boost Clock780 MHzvs-
ArchitectureGCN 1.1 Oland PROKaveri
OC Potential Good vs None
Driver Support Great vs -
Release Date08 Oct 2013vs30 Jun 2014
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768
6.4
green tick vs -
1600x900
4.9
green tick vs -
1920x1080
3.1
green tick vs -
2560x1440
2.3
green tick vs -
3840x2160
1.5
green tick vs -

GPU Memory

Memory2048 MBvsN/A
Memory Speed900 MHzvs1067 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3vsDDR3
Memory Bandwidth28.8GB/secvs34.1GB/sec
L2 Cache 512 KB green tick vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units320vs384
Actual Shader Performance10%vs9%
Technology28nmvs28nm
Texture Mapping Units20vs24
Texture Rate14.6 GTexel/svs17.3 GTexel/s
Render Output Units8vs8
Pixel Rate5.8 GPixel/svs5.8 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)4096x2160vs4096x2160
VGA Connections1vs0
DVI Connections1vs0
HDMI Connections1vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power30 Wattsvs65 Watts
Recommended PSU400 Watts & 18 Ampsvs300 Watts & 18 Amps

GPU Features

DirectX12.0vs11.2
Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.4vs4.3
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatedyesvsno
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i3-4130 3.4GHzvsAMD APU A8-7600 Quad-Core
Recommended RAM4 GBvs4 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1366x768vs1366x768

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewNote: This Graphics Card has 2 variants: one with DDR3 and another with GDDR5. This is the DDR3 Version.

Radeon R7 240 2GB offers a core codenamed Oland PRO and thus features 320 Shader Processing Units, 20 TMUs and 8 ROPs, on a 128-bit bus width of standard DDR3. While the central unit runs at 730MHz and goes up to 780MHz, in Turbo Mode, the memory clock operates at 900MHz.
With a rated board TDP of 30W, it requires no extra power connectors.

Compared to Radeon R7 250, its performance is significantly lower (over 25% slower), especially at higher resolutions due to the limited memory bandwidth. Still, the TDP is relatively low and so this card may be used on low end systems and offer a reasonable upgrade, when compared to integrated graphics.
Radeon R7 7800 is an integrated Graphics Card in the A10-7800.
It is based on the Graphics Core Next Architecture and offers 512 Shader Processing Units, 32 TMUs and 8 ROPs. The memory bus-width will depend on whether or not the system's RAM is dual-channeled and the operating memory clock, on its frequency. Thus, it can be either 64-bit or 128-bit and up to 1067MHz.
Therefore, the Graphics Card's performance depends a lot on the system configuration. Best case scenario, expect performance similar to Intel's powerful Iris Graphics 5100.
The card is thus suited for 720p gaming and some modern demanding games can be played at least on medium settings.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
-
GPU Variants
-