Recommended System Requirements | ||
---|---|---|
Game | Radeon R7 240 Gigabyte OC 2GB Edition | GeForce GTX 460 SLI |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 744% | 113% |
Assassins Creed: Valhalla | 672% | 95% |
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War | 647% | 89% |
Hitman 3 | 998% | 177% |
Grand Theft Auto VI | 1087% | 200% |
FIFA 21 | 326% | 8% |
Far Cry 6 | 1121% | 208% |
Genshin Impact | 744% | 113% |
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands | 1110% | 206% |
Watch Dogs Legion | 714% | 106% |
In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 460 SLI are massively better than the AMD Radeon R7 240 Gigabyte OC 2GB Edition.
The R7 240 has a 105 MHz higher core clock speed than the GTX 460, but the GTX 460 has 92 more Texture Mapping Units than the R7 240. As a result, the GTX 460 exhibits a 60 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the R7 240. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.
The R7 240 has a 105 MHz higher core clock speed than the GTX 460, but the GTX 460 has 56 more Render Output Units than the R7 240. As a result, the GTX 460 exhibits a 37 GPixel/s better Pixel Fill Rate than the R7 240. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.
The R7 240 was released over three years more recently than the GTX 460, and so the R7 240 is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the GTX 460 when running the latest games.
The Radeon R7 240 Gigabyte OC 2GB Edition and the GeForce GTX 460 SLI have the same amount of video memory, but are likely to provide slightly different experiences when displaying game textures at high resolutions.
The GTX 460 has 201.6 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the R7 240, which means that the memory performance of the GTX 460 is massively better than the R7 240.
The Radeon R7 240 Gigabyte OC 2GB Edition has 320 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GTX 460 SLI has 672. However, the actual shader performance of the R7 240 is 245 and the actual shader performance of the GTX 460 is 907. The GTX 460 having 662 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the GTX 460 delivers a massively smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the R7 240.
The R7 240 transistor size technology is 12 nm (nanometers) smaller than the GTX 460. This means that the R7 240 is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the GTX 460.
The Radeon R7 240 Gigabyte OC 2GB Edition requires 30 Watts to run and the GeForce GTX 460 SLI requires 380 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 400 Watts for the R7 240 and a PSU with at least 600 Watts for the GTX 460. The GTX 460 requires 350 Watts more than the R7 240 to run. The difference is significant enough that the GTX 460 may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the R7 240.
Core Speed | 780 MHz | ![]() | vs | 675 MHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Boost Clock | 900 MHz | ![]() | vs | - | |
Architecture | GCN 1.1 Oland PRO | Fermi GF104-300-KB-A1 (x2) | |||
OC Potential | Poor |
![]() |
vs | None | |
Driver Support | Great |
![]() | vs | Poor | |
Release Date | 09 Oct 2013 | ![]() | vs | 01 Jul 2010 | |
GPU Link | GD Link | GD Link | |||
Approved | ![]() | ![]() | |||
Comparison |
1366x768 | 6.6
|
vs | ![]() |
10
|
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1600x900 | 5.1
|
vs | ![]() |
9.1
|
|
1920x1080 | 3.2
|
vs | ![]() |
7.3
|
|
2560x1440 | 2.3
|
vs | ![]() |
4.3
|
|
3840x2160 | 1.5
|
![]() |
vs | - |
Memory | 2048 MB | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 2048 MB |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Memory Speed | 900 MHz | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 900 MHz |
Memory Bus | 128 Bit | vs | ![]() | 512 Bit | |
Memory Type | DDR3 | vs | ![]() | GDDR5 | |
Memory Bandwidth | 28.8GB/sec | vs | ![]() | 230.4GB/sec | |
L2 Cache | 512 KB | vs | ![]() |
1024 KB | |
Delta Color Compression | no | vs | no | ||
Memory Performance | 0% | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
0% |
Comparison |
Shader Processing Units | 320 | vs | ![]() | 672 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual Shader Performance | 12% | vs | ![]() | 44% | |
Technology | 28nm | ![]() | vs | 40nm | |
Texture Mapping Units | 20 | vs | ![]() | 112 | |
Texture Rate | 15.6 GTexel/s | vs | ![]() | 75.6 GTexel/s | |
Render Output Units | 8 | vs | ![]() | 64 | |
Pixel Rate | 6.2 GPixel/s | vs | ![]() | 43.2 GPixel/s | |
Comparison |
Max Digital Resolution (WxH) | 4096x2160 | ![]() | vs | 2560x1600 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGA Connections | 1 | ![]() | vs | 0 | |
DVI Connections | 1 | vs | ![]() | 4 | |
HDMI Connections | 1 | vs | ![]() | 2 | |
DisplayPort Connections | - | vs | - | ||
Comparison |
Max Power | 30 Watts | ![]() | vs | 380 Watts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended PSU | 400 Watts & 18 Amps | ![]() | vs | 600 Watts & 26 Amps |
DirectX | 12.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 12.0 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shader Model | 5.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 5.0 |
Open GL | 4.4 | vs | ![]() | 4.5 | |
Open CL | - | vs | - | ||
Notebook GPU | no | no | |||
SLI/Crossfire | no | vs | no | ||
Dedicated | yes | ![]() | vs | ![]() | yes |
Comparison |
Recommended Processor | Intel Core i3-4130 3.4GHz | - | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended RAM | 4 GB | ![]() | vs | 8 GB | |
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution | 1366x768 | vs | ![]() | 1920x1080 |
Performance Value | ![]() |
---|
Mini Review | Radeon R7 240 Gigabyte OC 2GB Edition is a special edition of the middle-class Radeon R7 240 2GB. This edition comes with a special 10nm fan which will reduce the card's temperature and overclocked out of the box in the central unit that was increased from 730MHz to 780MHz, while the Boost clock is now of 900MHz. Benchmarks indicate a 5% performance boost over the standard edition. | GeForce GTX 460 SLI is a solution of two GeForce GTX 460 put together using NVIDIA'S SLI technology. SLI relies a lot on proper driver support and may cause micro stuttering in FPS below 30. This means this combination might even perform worse than a single GTX 460. The optimal performance it delivers is slightly better than a single GeForce GTX 480. Therefore, this combination is sufficient for gaming at 1080p and most demanding games can be played at the highest settings. |
---|
Recommended CPU | - | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Possible GPU Upgrades | - | ||||
GPU Variants | - | - |