In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the R7 240 and the R7 240 are equal.

The R7 240 and the R7 240 have both the same core clock speed and the same Texture Fill Rate. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The R7 240 and the R7 240 have both the same core clock speed and the same Pixel Fill Rate. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The R7 240 was released less than a year after the R7 240, and so they are likely to have similar driver support for optimizing performance when running the latest games.

The Radeon R7 240 MSI Low Profile 2GB Edition and the Radeon R7 240 2GB have the same amount of video memory, but are likely to provide slightly different experiences when displaying game textures at high resolutions.

The memory bandwidth of the Radeon R7 240 MSI Low Profile 2GB Edition and the Radeon R7 240 2GB are the same, which means the R7 240 and the R7 240 have equal limitations when it comes to graphical data transfer.

Both the Radeon R7 240 MSI Low Profile 2GB Edition and the Radeon R7 240 2GB have 320 Shader Processing Units. Having the same number of SPUs and using the same architecture means that the performance they offer can be compared by looking at the memory bandwidth, Texture and Pixel Rates. In this case, the two GPUs have extremely similar stats, so any gaming performance difference would most likely be negligible.

The Radeon R7 240 MSI Low Profile 2GB Edition requires 35 Watts to run and the Radeon R7 240 2GB requires 30 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 400 Watts for the R7 240 and a PSU with at least 400 Watts for the R7 240. The R7 240 requires 5 Watts more than the R7 240 to run. The difference is not significant enough for the R7 240 to have a noticeably larger impact on your yearly electricity bills than the R7 240.