Recommended System Requirements | ||
---|---|---|
Game | Radeon R7 240 PowerColor OC V2 2GB Edition | Radeon R7 240 2GB |
Hitman 3 | 1041% | 1053% |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 777% | 786% |
Assassins Creed: Valhalla | 702% | 711% |
Resident Evil 8 | 777% | 786% |
FIFA 21 | 343% | 347% |
Grand Theft Auto VI | 1134% | 1147% |
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War | 676% | 684% |
Genshin Impact | 777% | 786% |
Far Cry 6 | 1169% | 1182% |
The Medium | 995% | 1006% |
In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon R7 240 PowerColor OC V2 2GB Edition are marginally better than the AMD Radeon R7 240 2GB.
The R7 240 has a 20 MHz higher core clock speed and the same number of Texture Mapping Units as the R7 240. This results in the R7 240 providing 0.4 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.
The R7 240 has a 20 MHz higher core clock speed than the R7 240 and the same number of Render Output Units. This results in the R7 240 providing 0.2 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.
Both the Radeon R7 240 PowerColor OC V2 2GB Edition and the Radeon R7 240 2GB were released at the same time, so are likely to be quite similar.
The Radeon R7 240 PowerColor OC V2 2GB Edition and the Radeon R7 240 2GB have the same amount of video memory, but are likely to provide slightly different experiences when displaying game textures at high resolutions.
The memory bandwidth of the Radeon R7 240 PowerColor OC V2 2GB Edition and the Radeon R7 240 2GB are the same, which means the R7 240 and the R7 240 have equal limitations when it comes to graphical data transfer.
Both the Radeon R7 240 PowerColor OC V2 2GB Edition and the Radeon R7 240 2GB have 320 Shader Processing Units. Having the same number of SPUs and using the same architecture means that the performance they offer can be compared by looking at the memory bandwidth, Texture and Pixel Rates. In this case, the R7 240 has 0.4 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate and 0.2 GPixel/s better Pixel Fill Rate, but the has GB/sec greater memory bandwidth. Although the GPUs are very similar in performance, the R7 240 takes the edge.
The Radeon R7 240 PowerColor OC V2 2GB Edition requires 30 Watts to run and the Radeon R7 240 2GB requires 30 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 400 Watts for the R7 240 and a PSU with at least 400 Watts for the R7 240. The two GPUs require the same amount of wattage to run. As such, there is no need to worry about which will more significantly affect your yearly electricity bills.
Core Speed | 750 MHz | ![]() | vs | 730 MHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Boost Clock | 800 MHz | ![]() | vs | 780 MHz | |
Architecture | GCN 1.1 Oland PRO | GCN 1.1 Oland PRO | |||
OC Potential | Fair | vs |
![]() | Good | |
Driver Support | Great | vs | Great | ||
Release Date | 08 Oct 2013 | vs | 08 Oct 2013 | ||
GPU Link | GD Link | GD Link | |||
Approved | ![]() | ![]() | |||
Comparison |
1366x768 | 6.5
|
![]() |
vs | 6.4
|
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1600x900 | 4.9
|
![]() |
vs | ![]() |
4.9
|
1920x1080 | 3.2
|
![]() |
vs | 3.1
|
|
2560x1440 | 2.3
|
![]() |
vs | ![]() |
2.3
|
3840x2160 | 1.5
|
![]() |
vs | ![]() |
1.5
|
Memory | 2048 MB | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 2048 MB |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Memory Speed | 900 MHz | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 900 MHz |
Memory Bus | 128 Bit | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 128 Bit |
Memory Type | DDR3 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | DDR3 |
Memory Bandwidth | 28.8GB/sec | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 28.8GB/sec |
L2 Cache | 512 KB | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
512 KB |
Delta Color Compression | no | vs | no | ||
Memory Performance | 0% | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
0% |
Comparison |
Shader Processing Units | 320 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 320 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual Shader Performance | 10% | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 10% |
Technology | 28nm | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 28nm |
Texture Mapping Units | 20 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 20 |
Texture Rate | 15 GTexel/s | ![]() | vs | 14.6 GTexel/s | |
Render Output Units | 8 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 8 |
Pixel Rate | 6 GPixel/s | ![]() | vs | 5.8 GPixel/s | |
Comparison |
Max Digital Resolution (WxH) | 4096x2160 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 4096x2160 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGA Connections | 1 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1 |
DVI Connections | 1 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1 |
HDMI Connections | 1 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1 |
DisplayPort Connections | - | vs | - | ||
Comparison |
Max Power | 30 Watts | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 30 Watts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended PSU | 400 Watts & 18 Amps | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 400 Watts & 18 Amps |
DirectX | 12.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 12.0 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shader Model | 5.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 5.0 |
Open GL | 4.4 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 4.4 |
Open CL | - | vs | - | ||
Notebook GPU | no | no | |||
SLI/Crossfire | no | vs | no | ||
Dedicated | yes | ![]() | vs | ![]() | yes |
Comparison |
Recommended Processor | Intel Core i3-4130 3.4GHz | vs | Intel Core i3-4130 3.4GHz | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended RAM | 4 GB | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 4 GB |
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution | 1366x768 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1366x768 |
Performance Value | ![]() |
---|
Mini Review | Radeon R7 240 PowerColor OC V2 2GB Edition is a special edition of the middle-class Radeon R7 240. This edition comes overclocked out of the box in the central unit that was increased from 730MHz to 750MHz, while the Boost clock is now of 800MHz and features a custom cooling solution. Benchmarks indicate a 1% performance boost over the standard edition. | Note: This Graphics Card has 2 variants: one with DDR3 and another with GDDR5. This is the DDR3 Version. Radeon R7 240 2GB offers a core codenamed Oland PRO and thus features 320 Shader Processing Units, 20 TMUs and 8 ROPs, on a 128-bit bus width of standard DDR3. While the central unit runs at 730MHz and goes up to 780MHz, in Turbo Mode, the memory clock operates at 900MHz. With a rated board TDP of 30W, it requires no extra power connectors. Compared to Radeon R7 250, its performance is significantly lower (over 25% slower), especially at higher resolutions due to the limited memory bandwidth. Still, the TDP is relatively low and so this card may be used on low end systems and offer a reasonable upgrade, when compared to integrated graphics. |
---|