Recommended System Requirements | ||
---|---|---|
Game | Radeon R7 250 Gigabyte OC 2GB Edition | GeForce GTX 750 EVGA Superclocked 1GB Edition |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 399% | 205% |
Hitman 3 | 549% | 296% |
Assassins Creed: Valhalla | 356% | 179% |
Resident Evil 8 | 399% | 205% |
FIFA 21 | 152% | 54% |
Grand Theft Auto VI | 602% | 329% |
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War | 341% | 170% |
The Medium | 522% | 280% |
Genshin Impact | 399% | 205% |
Far Cry 6 | 622% | 341% |
In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 EVGA Superclocked 1GB Edition are significantly better than the AMD Radeon R7 250 Gigabyte OC 2GB Edition.
The GTX 750 has a 165 MHz higher core clock speed and 8 more Texture Mapping Units than the R7 250. This results in the GTX 750 providing 13.7 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.
The GTX 750 has a 165 MHz higher core clock speed and 8 more Render Output Units than the R7 250. This results in the GTX 750 providing 11 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.
The GTX 750 was released less than a year after the R7 250, and so they are likely to have similar driver support for optimizing performance when running the latest games.
The R7 250 has 1024 MB more video memory than the GTX 750, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. However, overall, the GTX 750 has superior memory performance.
The GTX 750 has 6.6 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the R7 250, which means that the memory performance of the GTX 750 is marginally better than the R7 250.
The Radeon R7 250 Gigabyte OC 2GB Edition has 384 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GTX 750 EVGA Superclocked 1GB Edition has 512. However, the actual shader performance of the R7 250 is 359 and the actual shader performance of the GTX 750 is 894. The GTX 750 having 535 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the GTX 750 delivers a noticeably smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the R7 250.
The Radeon R7 250 Gigabyte OC 2GB Edition requires 65 Watts to run and the GeForce GTX 750 EVGA Superclocked 1GB Edition requires 55 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 400 Watts for the R7 250 and a PSU with at least 300 Watts for the GTX 750. The R7 250 requires 10 Watts more than the GTX 750 to run. The difference is not significant enough for the R7 250 to have a noticeably larger impact on your yearly electricity bills than the GTX 750.
Core Speed | 1050 MHz | vs | ![]() | 1215 MHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | vs | ![]() | 1294 MHz | |
Architecture | GCN 1.1 Oland XT | Maxwell GM107-300-A2 | |||
OC Potential | Poor | vs |
![]() | Good | |
Driver Support | Great | vs | Great | ||
Release Date | 09 Oct 2013 | vs | ![]() | 02 Mar 2014 | |
GPU Link | GD Link | GD Link | |||
Approved | ![]() | ![]() | |||
Comparison |
1366x768 | - | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
- |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1600x900 | 5.7
|
vs | ![]() |
7.9
|
|
1920x1080 | 4.7
|
vs | ![]() |
6.1
|
|
2560x1440 | 3.1
|
vs | ![]() |
4.3
|
|
3840x2160 | 2.1
|
vs | ![]() |
2.6
|
Memory | 2048 MB | ![]() | vs | 1024 MB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Memory Speed | 1150 MHz | vs | ![]() | 1253 MHz | |
Memory Bus | 128 Bit | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 128 Bit |
Memory Type | GDDR5 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | GDDR5 |
Memory Bandwidth | 73.6GB/sec | vs | ![]() | 80.2GB/sec | |
L2 Cache | 512 KB | vs | ![]() |
2048 KB | |
Delta Color Compression | no | vs | no | ||
Memory Performance | 0% | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
0% |
Comparison |
Shader Processing Units | 384 | vs | ![]() | 512 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual Shader Performance | 17% | vs | ![]() | 43% | |
Technology | 28nm | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 28nm |
Texture Mapping Units | 24 | vs | ![]() | 32 | |
Texture Rate | 25.2 GTexel/s | vs | ![]() | 38.9 GTexel/s | |
Render Output Units | 8 | vs | ![]() | 16 | |
Pixel Rate | 8.4 GPixel/s | vs | ![]() | 19.4 GPixel/s | |
Comparison |
Max Digital Resolution (WxH) | 2560x1600 | vs | ![]() | 4096x2160 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGA Connections | 1 | ![]() | vs | 0 | |
DVI Connections | 1 | vs | ![]() | 2 | |
HDMI Connections | 1 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1 |
DisplayPort Connections | - | vs | - | ||
Comparison |
Max Power | 65 Watts | vs | ![]() | 55 Watts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended PSU | 400 Watts & 18 Amps | vs | ![]() | 300 Watts & 20 Amps |
DirectX | 12.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 12.0 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shader Model | 5.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 5.0 |
Open GL | 4.4 | vs | ![]() | 4.5 | |
Open CL | - | vs | - | ||
Notebook GPU | no | no | |||
SLI/Crossfire | yes | ![]() | vs | no | |
Dedicated | yes | ![]() | vs | ![]() | yes |
Comparison |
Recommended Processor | Intel Core i3-4130 3.4GHz | vs | Intel Core i3-4130 3.4GHz | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended RAM | 8 GB | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 8 GB |
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution | 1600x900 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1600x900 |
Performance Value | ![]() |
---|
Mini Review | Radeon R7 250 Gigabyte OC 2GB Edition is a special edition of the middle-class Radeon R7 250 2GB. This edition comes with a special 10cnm fan, which will reduce the card's temperature and comes overclocked out of the box in the central unit that was increased from 1000MHz to 1050MHz, while the Boost clock is now of 1100MHz. Benchmarks indicate a 3% performance boost over the standard edition. | GeForce GTX 750 EVGA Superclocked 1GB Edition is a special edition of the fast-middle-class GeForce GTX 750. This edition comes with a custom cooling cooling solution which by itself will allow a slight performance boost, as GeForce GTX 750 benefits from the GPU Boost 2.0 technology. Furthermore, it comes overclocked out of the box in the central unit that was raised from 1020MHz to 1215MHz, while the Turbo Boost is now of 1294MHz, instead of 1085MHz. The operating memory clock was left untouched. Further overclocking can be achieved easily, as the GPU has great OC potential. Benchmarks indicate its performance is around 6% better than the reference card. |
---|
Recommended CPU | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Possible GPU Upgrades | - | ||||
GPU Variants | - | - |