Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game GeForce GTX 980 4GB SLI GeForce GTX 680 Quad SLI
Cyberpunk 2077 31% 3%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 36% 11%
Genshin Impact 30% 2%
eFootball PES 2021 65% 51%
FIFA 21 65% 51%
Watch Dogs Legion 33% 6%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 29% 1%
Marvel's Avengers 34% 7%
Mafia: Definitive Edition 0% 40%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 38% 14%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 4GB SLI are significantly better than the Nvidia GeForce GTX 680 Quad SLI.

The GTX 980 has a 120 MHz higher core clock speed than the GTX 680, but the GTX 680 has 256 more Texture Mapping Units than the GTX 980. As a result, the GTX 680 exhibits a 226.8 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the GTX 980. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The GTX 980 has a 120 MHz higher core clock speed than the GTX 680 and the same number of Render Output Units. This results in the GTX 980 providing 15.3 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The GTX 980 was released over a year more recently than the GTX 680, and so the GTX 980 is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the GTX 680.

Both GPUs exhibit very powerful performance, so it probably isn't worth upgrading from one to the other, as both are capable of running even the most demanding games at the highest settings.

The GeForce GTX 980 4GB SLI and the GeForce GTX 680 Quad SLI have the same amount of video memory, but are likely to provide slightly different experiences when displaying game textures at high resolutions.

The GTX 680 has 320.2 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GTX 980, which means that the memory performance of the GTX 680 is massively better than the GTX 980.

The GeForce GTX 980 4GB SLI has 4096 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GTX 680 Quad SLI has 6144. However, the actual shader performance of the GTX 980 is 6724 and the actual shader performance of the GTX 680 is 6500. The GTX 980 having 224 better shader performance is not particularly notable, as altogether the GTX 680 performs better when taking into account other relevant data.

The GeForce GTX 980 4GB SLI requires 350 Watts to run and the GeForce GTX 680 Quad SLI requires 780 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 750 Watts for the GTX 980. The GTX 680 requires 430 Watts more than the GTX 980 to run. The difference is significant enough that the GTX 680 may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the GTX 980.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed1126 MHzvs1006 MHz
Boost Clock1216 MHzvs1058 MHz
ArchitectureMaxwell GM204-400-A1 (x2)Kepler GK104-400-A2 (x4)
OC Potential Fair vs Good
Driver Support Great vs Good
Release Date19 Sep 2014vs01 Mar 2012
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768 - green tick vs green tick -
1600x900
10
green tick vs -
1920x1080
10
green tick vs green tick
10
2560x1440
9.9
green tick vs
8.8
3840x2160
7.8
green tick vs -

GPU Memory

Memory8192 MBvs8192 MB
Memory Speed1753 MHzvs1502 MHz
Memory Bus512 Bitvs1024 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth448.8GB/secvs769GB/sec
L2 Cache 4096 KB green tick vs 2048 KB
Delta Color Compression yes vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units4096vs6144
Actual Shader Performance100%vs100%
Technology28nmvs28nm
Texture Mapping Units256vs512
Texture Rate288.3 GTexel/svs515.1 GTexel/s
Render Output Units128vs128
Pixel Rate144.1 GPixel/svs128.8 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)4096x2160vs4096x2160
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections1vs0
HDMI Connections1vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power350 Wattsvs780 Watts
Recommended PSU750 Watts & 42 Amps-

GPU Features

DirectX12.1vs12.0
Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.5vs4.5
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsyes
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i7-5820K 6-Core 3.3GHzvsIntel Core i7-3770K 4-Core 3.5GHz
Recommended RAM16 GBvs8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution5760x1080vs1920x1080

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
GeForce GTX 980 4GB SLI is a solution of two GeForce GTX 980 4GB put together using NVIDIA's SLI technology.

Architecture
The Second variant of the Maxwell Architecture, despite being also manufactured with a 28nm technology, has an extremely large L2 Cache and features a Third Generation Delta Color Compression which allows NVIDIA to produce Graphics Cards with relatively small memory data transfer rates, without causing too much impact on the overall performance. Furthermore, the Shaders have been redesigned and are both more powerful and energy efficient.

GPU
It consists of 2 GPUs codenamed GM204-400-A1 which, together, offer 4096 Shader Processing Units, 256 TMUs and 128 ROPs, on a 512-bit memory interface of fast GDDR5. The central unit runs at 1126MHz and goes up to 1216MHz, in Turbo Mode, while the memory clock operates at 1753MHz.

Power Consumption
Power Consumption lies between 300W and 400W.

Performance
Gaming benchmarks prove that at 4K (3840x2160) GeForce GTX 980 4GB SLI is over 7% faster than AMD's Radeon R9 295X2.

System Suggestions
We recommend a very strong processor (Intel Core i7 Six Core/AMD FX Eight Core) and 16GB of RAM for a system with GeForce GTX 980 4GB SLI.
GeForce GTX 680 Quad SLI is a solution of four GeForce GTX 680 put together using NVIDIA'S SLI technology.
Check the page of GeForce GTX 680 to know more about its chip.
As usual, SLI relies a lot on proper driver support and may suffer from micro-stuttering in lower frame rates (below 30). Benchmarks indicate the performance is overall, is up to around 115% better than a single GeForce GTX 680 performing by itself but at times (depending whether or not the 3D game supports SLI or in the graphics driver) it performed worse than a single GeForce GTX 680. Expect this combination to draw up to 780 Watt though the average power consumption should be slightly lower.
Even the most demanding games will run at the highest settings.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
-
GPU Variants
-
-