Select any two GPUs for comparison

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game GeForce GTX 980 4GB SLI GeForce 9600 GT Asus Magic HDMI 512MB Edition
Cyberpunk 2077 31% 700%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 36% 638%
Genshin Impact 30% 707%
eFootball PES 2021 65% 307%
FIFA 21 65% 307%
Watch Dogs Legion 33% 679%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 29% 721%
Marvel's Avengers 34% 664%
Mafia: Definitive Edition 0% 1057%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 38% 614%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 4GB SLI are massively better than the Nvidia GeForce 9600 GT Asus Magic HDMI 512MB Edition.

The GTX 980 has a 526 MHz higher core clock speed and 224 more Texture Mapping Units than the 9600 GT. This results in the GTX 980 providing 269.1 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The GTX 980 has a 526 MHz higher core clock speed and 112 more Render Output Units than the 9600 GT. This results in the GTX 980 providing 134.5 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The GTX 980 was released over three years more recently than the 9600 GT, and so the GTX 980 is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the 9600 GT when running the latest games.

The GTX 980 has 7680 MB more video memory than the 9600 GT, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the GTX 980 also has superior memory performance overall.

The GTX 980 has 423.2 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the 9600 GT, which means that the memory performance of the GTX 980 is massively better than the 9600 GT.

The GeForce GTX 980 4GB SLI has 4096 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce 9600 GT Asus Magic HDMI 512MB Edition has 64. However, the actual shader performance of the GTX 980 is 6724 and the actual shader performance of the 9600 GT is 96. The GTX 980 having 6628 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the GTX 980 delivers a massively smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the 9600 GT.

The GTX 980 transistor size technology is 37 nm (nanometers) smaller than the 9600 GT. This means that the GTX 980 is expected to run much cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the 9600 GT.

The GeForce GTX 980 4GB SLI requires 350 Watts to run and the GeForce 9600 GT Asus Magic HDMI 512MB Edition requires 50 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 750 Watts for the GTX 980 and a PSU with at least 350 Watts for the 9600 GT. The GTX 980 requires 300 Watts more than the 9600 GT to run. The difference is significant enough that the GTX 980 may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the 9600 GT.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed1126 MHzvs600 MHz
Boost Clock1216 MHzvs-
ArchitectureMaxwell GM204-400-A1 (x2)Tesla G94-300-A1
OC Potential Fair vs Good
Driver Support Great vs Poor
Release Date19 Sep 2014vs01 Feb 2008
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link

Resolution Performance

1366x768 - green tick vs green tick -
green tick vs
green tick vs
green tick vs
green tick vs

GPU Memory

Memory8192 MBvs512 MB
Memory Speed1753 MHzvs400 MHz
Memory Bus512 Bitvs256 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5vsGDDR3
Memory Bandwidth448.8GB/secvs25.6GB/sec
L2 Cache 4096 KB green tick vs 0 KB
Delta Color Compression yes vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units4096vs64
Actual Shader Performance100%vs5%
Texture Mapping Units256vs32
Texture Rate288.3 GTexel/svs19.2 GTexel/s
Render Output Units128vs16
Pixel Rate144.1 GPixel/svs9.6 GPixel/s

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)4096x2160vs2560x1600
VGA Connections0vs1
DVI Connections1vs1
HDMI Connections1vs1
DisplayPort Connections-vs-

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power350 Wattsvs50 Watts
Recommended PSU750 Watts & 42 Ampsvs350 Watts & 20 Amps

GPU Features

Shader Model5.0vs4.0
Open GL4.5vs3.3
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i7-5820K 6-Core 3.3GHzvsIntel Core 2 Duo E8400 3.0GHz
Recommended RAM16 GBvs4 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution5760x1080vs1366x768

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
GeForce GTX 980 4GB SLI is a solution of two GeForce GTX 980 4GB put together using NVIDIA's SLI technology.

The Second variant of the Maxwell Architecture, despite being also manufactured with a 28nm technology, has an extremely large L2 Cache and features a Third Generation Delta Color Compression which allows NVIDIA to produce Graphics Cards with relatively small memory data transfer rates, without causing too much impact on the overall performance. Furthermore, the Shaders have been redesigned and are both more powerful and energy efficient.

It consists of 2 GPUs codenamed GM204-400-A1 which, together, offer 4096 Shader Processing Units, 256 TMUs and 128 ROPs, on a 512-bit memory interface of fast GDDR5. The central unit runs at 1126MHz and goes up to 1216MHz, in Turbo Mode, while the memory clock operates at 1753MHz.

Power Consumption
Power Consumption lies between 300W and 400W.

Gaming benchmarks prove that at 4K (3840x2160) GeForce GTX 980 4GB SLI is over 7% faster than AMD's Radeon R9 295X2.

System Suggestions
We recommend a very strong processor (Intel Core i7 Six Core/AMD FX Eight Core) and 16GB of RAM for a system with GeForce GTX 980 4GB SLI.
GeForce 9600 GT Asus Magic HDMI 512MB Edition is a special edition of GeForce 9600 GT 512MB.
This edition comes with one HDMI port and optimized for low power consumption. To achieve that, the Core-Clock was reduced by 50MHz to 600MHz and the GPU accesses DDR2 memory, leading to an over 50% slower operating memory clock.
As a result, the card allegedly consumes up to 40% less energy under load (and heats less) but it offers very little resilience to higher resolutions and has a relatively lower shading performance.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
GPU Variants